Comparison of vasopressors for management of hypotension in high-risk caesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Shiyue Zhao, Qi Chen, Peipei Qin, Ling Liu, Ke Wei
{"title":"Comparison of vasopressors for management of hypotension in high-risk caesarean section under neuraxial anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Shiyue Zhao, Qi Chen, Peipei Qin, Ling Liu, Ke Wei","doi":"10.1186/s12871-024-02819-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vasopressors are effective in managing perioperative hypotension in high-risk parturients undergoing Caesarean section (CS). Nevertheless, the optimal vasopressor for addressing hypotension induced by neuraxial anesthesia remains a subject of investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared hypotension episodes among high-risk parturients who received ephedrine, noradrenaline, or phenylephrine by searching four electronic databases and reviewing the relevant references. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials directly comparing two or more vasopressors in the context of managing hypotension in high-risk parturients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia for CS. A network meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects and Bayesian random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 13 trials involving 1,262 patients. While our direct and indirect comparisons revealed no reveal statistically significant differences in the number of hypotensive episodes among patients treated with different vasopressors, vasopressors were hierarchically ranked. Phenylephrine (Rank of the best choice = 0.81) exhibited the highest effectiveness in preventing hypotension, followed by ephedrine (Rank of the best choice = 0.10) and noradrenaline (Rank of the best choice = 0.09). Bradycardia occurrence was higher in patients administered phenylephrine compared to those given noradrenaline (risk ratio [RR]: 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03 to 0.85) or ephedrine (RR: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.12). Notably, patients treated with phenylephrine or noradrenaline experienced reduced occurrences of nausea or vomiting compared to those who received ephedrine (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.59 for phenylephrine and RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.75 for noradrenaline). Regarding fetal outcomes, no significant differences were noted between noradrenaline and phenylephrine. Overall norepinephrine in maternal outcomes may be more favorable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest the potential advantages of phenylephrine for reducing hypotensive episodes in high-risk parturients undergoing CS. Noradrenalin may emerge as an alternative, particularly for women at high risk of caesarean delivery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023397259).</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"24 1","pages":"447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-024-02819-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vasopressors are effective in managing perioperative hypotension in high-risk parturients undergoing Caesarean section (CS). Nevertheless, the optimal vasopressor for addressing hypotension induced by neuraxial anesthesia remains a subject of investigation.

Methods: We compared hypotension episodes among high-risk parturients who received ephedrine, noradrenaline, or phenylephrine by searching four electronic databases and reviewing the relevant references. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials directly comparing two or more vasopressors in the context of managing hypotension in high-risk parturients undergoing neuraxial anesthesia for CS. A network meta-analysis was performed using fixed-effects and Bayesian random-effects models.

Results: We analyzed 13 trials involving 1,262 patients. While our direct and indirect comparisons revealed no reveal statistically significant differences in the number of hypotensive episodes among patients treated with different vasopressors, vasopressors were hierarchically ranked. Phenylephrine (Rank of the best choice = 0.81) exhibited the highest effectiveness in preventing hypotension, followed by ephedrine (Rank of the best choice = 0.10) and noradrenaline (Rank of the best choice = 0.09). Bradycardia occurrence was higher in patients administered phenylephrine compared to those given noradrenaline (risk ratio [RR]: 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03 to 0.85) or ephedrine (RR: 0.01; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.12). Notably, patients treated with phenylephrine or noradrenaline experienced reduced occurrences of nausea or vomiting compared to those who received ephedrine (RR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.19 to 0.59 for phenylephrine and RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.75 for noradrenaline). Regarding fetal outcomes, no significant differences were noted between noradrenaline and phenylephrine. Overall norepinephrine in maternal outcomes may be more favorable.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest the potential advantages of phenylephrine for reducing hypotensive episodes in high-risk parturients undergoing CS. Noradrenalin may emerge as an alternative, particularly for women at high risk of caesarean delivery.

Trial registration: This systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023397259).

神经轴麻醉下高危剖宫产术中血管加压药物治疗低血压的比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:血管加压药物对高危剖宫产患者围手术期低血压治疗有效。然而,解决由轴向麻醉引起的低血压的最佳血管加压药仍然是一个研究课题。方法:通过检索4个电子数据库并查阅相关文献,比较使用麻黄素、去甲肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素的高危产妇低血压发作情况。纳入标准包括随机对照试验,直接比较两种或两种以上的血管加压药物在高危产妇接受神经轴向麻醉治疗低血压的情况下。采用固定效应和贝叶斯随机效应模型进行网络meta分析。结果:我们分析了13项试验,涉及1262例患者。虽然我们的直接和间接比较显示,在使用不同血管加压药物治疗的患者中,低血压发作次数没有统计学上的显著差异,但血管加压药物是按等级排列的。苯肾上腺素(最佳选择Rank = 0.81)预防低血压的效果最好,其次是麻黄素(最佳选择Rank = 0.10)和去甲肾上腺素(最佳选择Rank = 0.09)。与去甲肾上腺素组相比,使用苯肾上腺素组的心动过缓发生率更高(风险比[RR]: 0.23;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.03 ~ 0.85)或麻黄碱(RR: 0.01;95% CI: 0.00 ~ 0.12)。值得注意的是,与接受麻黄碱治疗的患者相比,接受苯肾上腺素或去甲肾上腺素治疗的患者恶心或呕吐的发生率降低(RR: 0.37;苯肾上腺素的95% CI: 0.19 ~ 0.59, RR: 0.28;去甲肾上腺素组95% CI: 0.10 ~ 0.75)。关于胎儿结局,去甲肾上腺素和苯肾上腺素之间没有显著差异。整体去甲肾上腺素对产妇结局可能更有利。结论:我们的研究结果表明,苯肾上腺素在高危产妇CS手术中具有降低低血压发作的潜在优势。去甲肾上腺素可能会成为一种替代药物,特别是对于剖腹产风险较高的妇女。试验注册:本系统评价在PROSPERO注册(CRD42023397259)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信