LGBTQ+ lives in prisons: addressing the policy-practice gap.

Scott Thomas, Jonathan Glazzard
{"title":"LGBTQ+ lives in prisons: addressing the policy-practice gap.","authors":"Scott Thomas, Jonathan Glazzard","doi":"10.1108/IJOPH-06-2024-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this paper is to use lived experience and research to bridge the gap between LGBTQ+ policy and practice in prisons. The authors hope that this paper will ignite debate and lead to the development of policy, training and awareness across the prison estate in the United Kingdom (UK).</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This paper draws on the lived experiences of a serving prisoner, who has co-authored this paper. He identifies as gay. His examples of life behind bars depict the clear disconnect between policy and its application in practice. The authors have drawn on aspects of lived experience which best highlight gaps in policy and they have then used these to inform and justify the recommendations at the end of this paper.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This paper found that there is a clear disconnect between policy and practice in relation to supporting LGBTQ+ people in the prison estate. The findings highlight the haphazard approach to risk assessments and the manipulation of policy by both staff and prisoners.</p><p><strong>Research limitations/implications: </strong>There is some research on the experiences of LGBTQ+ people in prisons in the UK, albeit limited. The authors recognise that drawing on the lived experiences of individuals calls into question the reliability of the findings and implications that they have proposed. However, these experiences do align with the existing research. There is an urgent need for further research into the experiences of LGBTQ+ people within prisons.</p><p><strong>Practical implications: </strong>This paper is intended to ignite debate on the experiences and rights of LGBTQ+ prisoners. Implementing the recommendations that are outlined in this article will help to create a more consistent approach to the application of LGBTQ+ prisoners' rights.</p><p><strong>Social implications: </strong>LGBTQ+ people are more likely to experience poor mental health. Implementing the policy recommendations will help to create more inclusive cultures within prisons. In addition, the recommendations seek to foster the development of positive attitudes through developing educational resources which aim to challenge discrimination and prejudice. This furthers the advancement of social justice and inclusion, not just in prisons but also in the community. Prisoners returning to the community are more likely to enter it with healthy and inclusive values in relation to LGBTQ+.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>This paper draws on the lived experiences of a serving long-term prisoner. Thus, it provides a valuable and unique insight into day-to-day life in the prison system. This insight is valuable to both policy makers and researchers who are seeking to develop a better, more informed understanding of life behind bars for LGBTQ+ prisoners.</p>","PeriodicalId":519936,"journal":{"name":"International journal of prison health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of prison health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPH-06-2024-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to use lived experience and research to bridge the gap between LGBTQ+ policy and practice in prisons. The authors hope that this paper will ignite debate and lead to the development of policy, training and awareness across the prison estate in the United Kingdom (UK).

Design/methodology/approach: This paper draws on the lived experiences of a serving prisoner, who has co-authored this paper. He identifies as gay. His examples of life behind bars depict the clear disconnect between policy and its application in practice. The authors have drawn on aspects of lived experience which best highlight gaps in policy and they have then used these to inform and justify the recommendations at the end of this paper.

Findings: This paper found that there is a clear disconnect between policy and practice in relation to supporting LGBTQ+ people in the prison estate. The findings highlight the haphazard approach to risk assessments and the manipulation of policy by both staff and prisoners.

Research limitations/implications: There is some research on the experiences of LGBTQ+ people in prisons in the UK, albeit limited. The authors recognise that drawing on the lived experiences of individuals calls into question the reliability of the findings and implications that they have proposed. However, these experiences do align with the existing research. There is an urgent need for further research into the experiences of LGBTQ+ people within prisons.

Practical implications: This paper is intended to ignite debate on the experiences and rights of LGBTQ+ prisoners. Implementing the recommendations that are outlined in this article will help to create a more consistent approach to the application of LGBTQ+ prisoners' rights.

Social implications: LGBTQ+ people are more likely to experience poor mental health. Implementing the policy recommendations will help to create more inclusive cultures within prisons. In addition, the recommendations seek to foster the development of positive attitudes through developing educational resources which aim to challenge discrimination and prejudice. This furthers the advancement of social justice and inclusion, not just in prisons but also in the community. Prisoners returning to the community are more likely to enter it with healthy and inclusive values in relation to LGBTQ+.

Originality/value: This paper draws on the lived experiences of a serving long-term prisoner. Thus, it provides a valuable and unique insight into day-to-day life in the prison system. This insight is valuable to both policy makers and researchers who are seeking to develop a better, more informed understanding of life behind bars for LGBTQ+ prisoners.

LGBTQ+生活在监狱:解决政策-实践差距。
目的:本文的目的是通过生活经验和研究来弥合监狱中LGBTQ+政策与实践之间的差距。作者希望这篇论文能够引发辩论,并导致英国监狱产业的政策、培训和意识的发展。设计/方法/方法:本文借鉴了一名在职囚犯的生活经历,他是本文的合著者之一。他认为自己是同性恋。他的狱中生活描述了政策与实际应用之间的明显脱节。作者借鉴了生活经验的各个方面,这些方面最能突出政策上的差距,然后他们用这些来为本文最后的建议提供信息和证明。研究结果:本文发现,在监狱中支持LGBTQ+人群的政策和实践之间存在明显的脱节。调查结果突出了风险评估的随意性以及工作人员和囚犯对政策的操纵。研究局限/启示:在英国有一些关于LGBTQ+人群在监狱中的经历的研究,尽管有限。作者认识到,利用个人的生活经历会对他们提出的研究结果和影响的可靠性提出质疑。然而,这些经验确实与现有的研究相一致。迫切需要进一步研究LGBTQ+人群在监狱中的经历。现实意义:本文旨在引发关于LGBTQ+囚犯的经历和权利的辩论。实施本文中概述的建议将有助于创建一种更加一致的方法来应用LGBTQ+囚犯的权利。社会影响:LGBTQ+人群更有可能经历心理健康状况不佳。执行政策建议将有助于在监狱内创造更具包容性的文化。此外,这些建议力求通过开发旨在挑战歧视和偏见的教育资源,促进积极态度的发展。这不仅在监狱而且在社区中进一步促进社会正义和包容。重返社会的囚犯更有可能带着与LGBTQ+相关的健康和包容的价值观进入社会。原创性/价值:本文取材于一名长期服刑囚犯的生活经历。因此,它提供了对监狱系统日常生活的宝贵和独特的见解。这一见解对政策制定者和研究人员都很有价值,他们正在寻求更好、更全面地了解LGBTQ+囚犯的监狱生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信