The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Journey of an Architect-Researcher in Palliative Environments.

Iris Beuls
{"title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Journey of an Architect-Researcher in Palliative Environments.","authors":"Iris Beuls","doi":"10.3233/SHTI240929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As an architect, I felt a strong moral urge to engage in research aimed at creating more human-centred healthcare environments, particularly in the context of palliative care. Being relatively new to this field 4 years ago, my primary goal then was to develop a deep understanding of these unique contexts, with a special focus on the people involved. To achieve this, I embarked on an immersive ethnographic study over the last few years, involving participant observations in three distinct palliative environments (i.e., day-care centre, hospice, and palliative care unit) and interviews with residents, family members, caregivers, volunteers, and maintenance staff. While preparing to present this study to an ethics panel, I believed I had covered all possible questions until I was unexpectedly asked, \"How will you consider your own emotional well-being?\" At that moment (in the 1st year of my PhD trajectory), I was unsure how to respond, but today (in the 4th year of my PhD), I would say that my approach was to verbally and visually document the entirety of the experience, including the positive, negative, and challenging aspects. Throughout my journey, I maintained a journal not only to express my thoughts and feelings but also to capture the methodological and ethical insights I had gained while conducting interdisciplinary research on the spatial experiences of individuals within palliative environments. This article serves as a comprehensive overview of all significant events preceding, during, and following the study. The insights were organised according to 'the good, the bad, and the ugly' to shed light on the complexities and nuances of conducting research in this unique and sensitive domain. In doing so, the aim of my contribution is to inspire novice researchers to embark on such research studies and offer them guidance along this undoubtedly beautiful yet occasionally challenging journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":94357,"journal":{"name":"Studies in health technology and informatics","volume":"319 ","pages":"2-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in health technology and informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI240929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As an architect, I felt a strong moral urge to engage in research aimed at creating more human-centred healthcare environments, particularly in the context of palliative care. Being relatively new to this field 4 years ago, my primary goal then was to develop a deep understanding of these unique contexts, with a special focus on the people involved. To achieve this, I embarked on an immersive ethnographic study over the last few years, involving participant observations in three distinct palliative environments (i.e., day-care centre, hospice, and palliative care unit) and interviews with residents, family members, caregivers, volunteers, and maintenance staff. While preparing to present this study to an ethics panel, I believed I had covered all possible questions until I was unexpectedly asked, "How will you consider your own emotional well-being?" At that moment (in the 1st year of my PhD trajectory), I was unsure how to respond, but today (in the 4th year of my PhD), I would say that my approach was to verbally and visually document the entirety of the experience, including the positive, negative, and challenging aspects. Throughout my journey, I maintained a journal not only to express my thoughts and feelings but also to capture the methodological and ethical insights I had gained while conducting interdisciplinary research on the spatial experiences of individuals within palliative environments. This article serves as a comprehensive overview of all significant events preceding, during, and following the study. The insights were organised according to 'the good, the bad, and the ugly' to shed light on the complexities and nuances of conducting research in this unique and sensitive domain. In doing so, the aim of my contribution is to inspire novice researchers to embark on such research studies and offer them guidance along this undoubtedly beautiful yet occasionally challenging journey.

好,坏,丑:在姑息环境中的建筑师研究之旅。
作为一名建筑师,我感受到一种强烈的道德冲动,即参与旨在创造更多以人为本的医疗环境的研究,特别是在姑息治疗的背景下。4年前,作为这个领域的新手,我当时的主要目标是深入了解这些独特的背景,并特别关注相关人员。为了实现这一目标,我在过去的几年里开始了一项沉浸式的民族志研究,包括在三个不同的姑息环境中(即,日托中心,临终关怀和姑息护理单位)进行参与者观察,并与居民,家庭成员,护理人员,志愿者和维护人员进行访谈。在准备将这项研究提交给一个伦理小组时,我相信我已经涵盖了所有可能的问题,直到我意外地被问到:“你将如何考虑你自己的情感健康?”在那一刻(在我博士生涯的第一年),我不确定如何回应,但今天(在我博士生涯的第四年),我会说我的方法是口头和视觉记录整个经历,包括积极的、消极的和具有挑战性的方面。在我的整个旅程中,我坚持写日记,不仅是为了表达我的想法和感受,也是为了捕捉我在对姑息环境中个体的空间体验进行跨学科研究时获得的方法论和伦理见解。本文作为研究之前、期间和之后所有重要事件的全面概述。这些见解是根据“好、坏、丑”来组织的,以阐明在这个独特而敏感的领域进行研究的复杂性和细微差别。在这样做的过程中,我的贡献的目的是激励新手研究人员开始这样的研究,并在这无疑是美丽的,但偶尔具有挑战性的旅程中为他们提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信