Rachel D. Savage PhD, Tai Huynh MDes, MBA, Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg PhD, Lavina Matai PharmD, MScPH, Alexa Boblitz MPH, Azmina Altaf MSc, Susan E. Bronskill PhD, Kevin A. Brown PhD, Patrick Feng PhD, Samantha E. Lewis-Fung MHSc, Maya S. Sheth BMSc, Christina Yu BScH, Jen Recknagel MDes, Paula A. Rochon MD, MPH
{"title":"A portrait of older adults in naturally occurring retirement communities in Ontario, Canada: A population-based study","authors":"Rachel D. Savage PhD, Tai Huynh MDes, MBA, Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg PhD, Lavina Matai PharmD, MScPH, Alexa Boblitz MPH, Azmina Altaf MSc, Susan E. Bronskill PhD, Kevin A. Brown PhD, Patrick Feng PhD, Samantha E. Lewis-Fung MHSc, Maya S. Sheth BMSc, Christina Yu BScH, Jen Recknagel MDes, Paula A. Rochon MD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs) are geographical areas that have naturally become home to a large concentration of older adults. This density means that NORCs have the potential to become a pillar for aging in place strategies, but at present, there is limited data on residents and their health needs. Our objective was to describe and compare the health and healthcare use of older adults living in high-rise NORC buildings to those in all other housing types in the community.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a population-based descriptive study of community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years by linking a provincial NORC registry in Ontario, Canada with health administrative records. Individuals were classified as NORC residents if their residential postal code on January 1, 2020 matched the NORC registry. Sociodemographic, clinical, and healthcare use characteristics were compared by NORC status using standardized differences (STD) and stratified by rurality, and further by age and sex in urban settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, 219,995 (7.7%) of 2,869,706 older adults were NORC residents. Compared to community-dwelling older adults, NORC residents were older (mean 77.4 vs 74.6 years; STD 0.34), and more were female (61.8% vs 52.2%; STD 0.19) and had low income (16.0% vs 9.3%; STD 0.11). NORC residents also had more active chronic conditions (mean 1.9 vs 1.5; STD 0.27), medications (mean 3.4 vs 2.8; STD 0.21), home care use (15.3% vs 9.8%; STD 0.17), and primary care visits (mean 9.7 vs 7.6 visits in prior 2 years; STD 0.22). Findings were robust across rurality, age, and sex.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings suggest that NORC residents have greater health needs than other older adults living in the community and underscore NORCs as important targets for equity-focused strategies to support aging in place.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 1","pages":"74-87"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734102/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Naturally occurring retirement communities (NORCs) are geographical areas that have naturally become home to a large concentration of older adults. This density means that NORCs have the potential to become a pillar for aging in place strategies, but at present, there is limited data on residents and their health needs. Our objective was to describe and compare the health and healthcare use of older adults living in high-rise NORC buildings to those in all other housing types in the community.
Methods
We conducted a population-based descriptive study of community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years by linking a provincial NORC registry in Ontario, Canada with health administrative records. Individuals were classified as NORC residents if their residential postal code on January 1, 2020 matched the NORC registry. Sociodemographic, clinical, and healthcare use characteristics were compared by NORC status using standardized differences (STD) and stratified by rurality, and further by age and sex in urban settings.
Results
Overall, 219,995 (7.7%) of 2,869,706 older adults were NORC residents. Compared to community-dwelling older adults, NORC residents were older (mean 77.4 vs 74.6 years; STD 0.34), and more were female (61.8% vs 52.2%; STD 0.19) and had low income (16.0% vs 9.3%; STD 0.11). NORC residents also had more active chronic conditions (mean 1.9 vs 1.5; STD 0.27), medications (mean 3.4 vs 2.8; STD 0.21), home care use (15.3% vs 9.8%; STD 0.17), and primary care visits (mean 9.7 vs 7.6 visits in prior 2 years; STD 0.22). Findings were robust across rurality, age, and sex.
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that NORC residents have greater health needs than other older adults living in the community and underscore NORCs as important targets for equity-focused strategies to support aging in place.
背景:自然发生的退休社区(norc)是自然成为大量老年人集中的地理区域。这种密度意味着农村中心有潜力成为就地老龄化战略的支柱,但目前,关于居民及其健康需求的数据有限。我们的目标是描述和比较居住在高层NORC建筑中的老年人与社区中所有其他住房类型的老年人的健康和医疗保健使用情况。方法:我们通过将加拿大安大略省的省级NORC登记处与卫生管理记录联系起来,对社区居住的≥65岁老年人进行了一项基于人群的描述性研究。如果2020年1月1日的居住邮政编码与NORC登记相匹配,则个人被归类为NORC居民。社会人口学、临床和医疗保健使用特征通过标准化差异(STD)的NORC状态进行比较,并按农村分层,在城市环境中进一步按年龄和性别分层。结果:总体而言,2,869,706名老年人中有219,995人(7.7%)是NORC居民。与社区居住的老年人相比,NORC居民年龄更大(平均77.4岁vs 74.6岁;性病0.34),女性多于男性(61.8% vs 52.2%;性病0.19),收入较低(16.0% vs 9.3%;性病0.11)。NORC居民也有更多的活动性慢性疾病(平均1.9 vs 1.5;STD 0.27),药物(平均3.4 vs 2.8;性病0.21),家庭护理使用(15.3% vs 9.8%;性病0.17)和初级保健就诊(前2年平均9.7次vs 7.6次;性病0.22)。调查结果在农村、年龄和性别方面都很明显。结论:我们的研究结果表明,NORC居民比生活在社区中的其他老年人有更大的健康需求,并强调NORC是公平关注策略的重要目标,以支持适当的老龄化。
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.