Dietetic Students' Perceived Anxiety towards Simulation Activities: A Mixed-methods Pilot Study.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Mylène Rosa, Alexandra M Bodnaruc, Isabelle Giroux
{"title":"Dietetic Students' Perceived Anxiety towards Simulation Activities: A Mixed-methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Mylène Rosa, Alexandra M Bodnaruc, Isabelle Giroux","doi":"10.3148/cjdpr-2024-018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To assess dietetic students' anxiety levels before and after a series of simulations and to document students' perceived sources of anxiety while completing simulation-based learning activities.<b>Methods:</b> A mixed-method convergent pilot study was conducted. Students enrolled in a Nutrition Assessment course that included a series of four simulations were invited to participate. Students completed an online pre-post simulation survey and engaged in individual interviews and a focus group discussion. The questionnaires included demographic questions and the French State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Nonparametric tests and thematic analysis were used to examine data.<b>Results:</b> Fourteen students participated in the study's quantitative component and seven in the qualitative component. There was a significant decrease in trait (44.5 ± 13.8 vs 32.0 ± 14.0, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and state (47.0 ± 11.2 vs 33.0 ± 18.0, <i>P</i> = 0.05) anxiety from pre- to post-simulations. Individual factors influencing students' anxiety levels were stress and self-confidence. External factors influencing students' anxiety levels were unknown situations, observers, patient profiles, observers' feedback, preparation level, and academic setting.<b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings suggest that ensuring the educator is not present during simulations, advance preparation, and reassurance that simulations are a learning and not an evaluation activity may be effective pedagogical strategies for dietetic educators to reduce learners' anxiety and facilitate competency development.</p>","PeriodicalId":56135,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3148/cjdpr-2024-018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To assess dietetic students' anxiety levels before and after a series of simulations and to document students' perceived sources of anxiety while completing simulation-based learning activities.Methods: A mixed-method convergent pilot study was conducted. Students enrolled in a Nutrition Assessment course that included a series of four simulations were invited to participate. Students completed an online pre-post simulation survey and engaged in individual interviews and a focus group discussion. The questionnaires included demographic questions and the French State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Nonparametric tests and thematic analysis were used to examine data.Results: Fourteen students participated in the study's quantitative component and seven in the qualitative component. There was a significant decrease in trait (44.5 ± 13.8 vs 32.0 ± 14.0, P = 0.01) and state (47.0 ± 11.2 vs 33.0 ± 18.0, P = 0.05) anxiety from pre- to post-simulations. Individual factors influencing students' anxiety levels were stress and self-confidence. External factors influencing students' anxiety levels were unknown situations, observers, patient profiles, observers' feedback, preparation level, and academic setting.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that ensuring the educator is not present during simulations, advance preparation, and reassurance that simulations are a learning and not an evaluation activity may be effective pedagogical strategies for dietetic educators to reduce learners' anxiety and facilitate competency development.

饮食学生对模拟活动的焦虑感:一项混合方法的初步研究。
目的:评估饮食学生在一系列模拟前后的焦虑水平,并记录学生在完成基于模拟的学习活动时感知到的焦虑来源。方法:采用混合方法进行收敛性先导研究。参加营养评估课程的学生被邀请参加,该课程包括一系列四种模拟。学生们完成了一项在线的前后模拟调查,并参与了个人访谈和焦点小组讨论。调查问卷包括人口统计问题和法国状态-特质焦虑量表。采用非参数检验和专题分析对数据进行检验。结果:14名学生参与了本研究的定量部分,7名学生参与了定性部分。模拟前后特质焦虑(44.5±13.8 vs 32.0±14.0,P = 0.01)和状态焦虑(47.0±11.2 vs 33.0±18.0,P = 0.05)显著降低。影响学生焦虑水平的个体因素为压力和自信。影响学生焦虑水平的外部因素包括未知情境、观察者、患者简介、观察者反馈、准备水平和学术环境。结论:我们的研究结果表明,确保教育工作者在模拟过程中不在场,提前准备,并保证模拟是一种学习而不是评估活动,可能是饮食教育工作者有效的教学策略,以减少学习者的焦虑,促进能力发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal considers manuscripts for publication that focus on applied food and nutrition research with direct application to the Canadian healthcare system and other contributions relevant to Canadian dietetic practice. The Journal does not publish market research studies, author opinions or animal studies. Manuscripts may be in English or French.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信