Omar M Al-Janabi, Anas Odeh, Aryan Gajjar, Avi Misra, Yamama M Mahmood, Amira M Taha, Rishabh Gupta, Sherief Ghozy, Alejandro A Rabinstein, David F Kallmes
{"title":"Timing of anticoagulation for patients with atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Omar M Al-Janabi, Anas Odeh, Aryan Gajjar, Avi Misra, Yamama M Mahmood, Amira M Taha, Rishabh Gupta, Sherief Ghozy, Alejandro A Rabinstein, David F Kallmes","doi":"10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the setting of atrial fibrillation (Afib) will need to start/resume anticoagulation (AC) as it is the mainstay for secondary stroke prevention. Several studies have compared the safety and outcomes of starting/resuming AC in early or late start windows (ESW or LSW) but there is no consensus in clinical practice on the optimal timing of anticoagulation. This meta-analysis aims to compare the safety and outcome measures after resuming AC in the ESW versus LSW in patients with Afib after AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent rigorous risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-I tool. We compared the safety and outcome measures after resuming AC in the ESW versus LSW in patients with Afib after AIS. Using the R software version 4.3.1, meta-analyses were conducted employing random-effect models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included data derived from 7 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 5 prospective observational studies). Rates of recurrent ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients who started AC in the ESW were comparable to those who started AC in the LSW (OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.49-1.04; p = 0.083). Similarly, the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality were comparable between the patients who started AC in the ESW versus LSW (OR 1.66, 95 % CI 0.43-6.47; p = 0.464) and (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.65-1.19; p = 0.402), respectively. Finally, using available data from 5 studies, rates of major bleeding were comparable as well between the patients who started AC in ESW versus LSW (OR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.50-1.96; p = 0.970).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Among patients with Afib and AIS who are starting AC in the ESW versus LSW, there were no differences in the outcome measures, specifically stroke/TIA, sICH, mortality, or major bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":54368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"108159"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2024.108159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in the setting of atrial fibrillation (Afib) will need to start/resume anticoagulation (AC) as it is the mainstay for secondary stroke prevention. Several studies have compared the safety and outcomes of starting/resuming AC in early or late start windows (ESW or LSW) but there is no consensus in clinical practice on the optimal timing of anticoagulation. This meta-analysis aims to compare the safety and outcome measures after resuming AC in the ESW versus LSW in patients with Afib after AIS.
Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent rigorous risk of bias assessment using the ROBINS-I tool. We compared the safety and outcome measures after resuming AC in the ESW versus LSW in patients with Afib after AIS. Using the R software version 4.3.1, meta-analyses were conducted employing random-effect models.
Results: This meta-analysis included data derived from 7 studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 5 prospective observational studies). Rates of recurrent ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients who started AC in the ESW were comparable to those who started AC in the LSW (OR 0.72, 95 % CI 0.49-1.04; p = 0.083). Similarly, the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality were comparable between the patients who started AC in the ESW versus LSW (OR 1.66, 95 % CI 0.43-6.47; p = 0.464) and (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.65-1.19; p = 0.402), respectively. Finally, using available data from 5 studies, rates of major bleeding were comparable as well between the patients who started AC in ESW versus LSW (OR 0.99, 95 % CI 0.50-1.96; p = 0.970).
Conclusion: Among patients with Afib and AIS who are starting AC in the ESW versus LSW, there were no differences in the outcome measures, specifically stroke/TIA, sICH, mortality, or major bleeding.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases publishes original papers on basic and clinical science related to the fields of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases. The Journal also features review articles, controversies, methods and technical notes, selected case reports and other original articles of special nature. Its editorial mission is to focus on prevention and repair of cerebrovascular disease. Clinical papers emphasize medical and surgical aspects of stroke, clinical trials and design, epidemiology, stroke care delivery systems and outcomes, imaging sciences and rehabilitation of stroke. The Journal will be of special interest to specialists involved in caring for patients with cerebrovascular disease, including neurologists, neurosurgeons and cardiologists.