{"title":"Evaluating Online YouTube Videos for Cervical Cancer Brachytherapy Patient Education.","authors":"Sarah Keyes, Brandon Chai, Paris-Ann Ingledew","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02546-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cervical cancer remains the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide, with brachytherapy an important modality of treatment. Patients often rely on YouTube for cancer-related information, yet few studies have evaluated these videos. This study aims to describe and evaluate YouTube videos available to patients relating to cervical cancer brachytherapy. YouTube was searched using pre-defined cervical cancer brachytherapy search terms in January, 2023. Videos were sorted by relevance and the first 50 videos from each search were collected. Duplicates were removed and exclusion criteria applied. Videos were evaluated for general parameters, source information, and content. Descriptive analyses were carried out. 47 unique videos were included in the analysis. Around half of videos were published within 3 years of the search date. Median video length was 4 min and 42 s. Commonly, videos were published in the USA (55%). Two-thirds of videos were aimed towards a patient audience. Overall, the content of 40% of videos related to cervical cancer, 94% related to radiation therapy including brachytherapy, and 51% directly related to the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Only 15% of videos overviewed the patient-relevant information of brachytherapy side effects. Some videos (13%) were advertisements and few (4%) contained grossly inaccurate information. Videos collectively presented an overview of the treatments for cervical cancer including brachytherapy, although few included pertinent patient-relevant information and some contained inaccurate information. Overall, this highlights the need for more clear, accurate, and patient education-focused online resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02546-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains the fourth most frequently diagnosed cancer worldwide, with brachytherapy an important modality of treatment. Patients often rely on YouTube for cancer-related information, yet few studies have evaluated these videos. This study aims to describe and evaluate YouTube videos available to patients relating to cervical cancer brachytherapy. YouTube was searched using pre-defined cervical cancer brachytherapy search terms in January, 2023. Videos were sorted by relevance and the first 50 videos from each search were collected. Duplicates were removed and exclusion criteria applied. Videos were evaluated for general parameters, source information, and content. Descriptive analyses were carried out. 47 unique videos were included in the analysis. Around half of videos were published within 3 years of the search date. Median video length was 4 min and 42 s. Commonly, videos were published in the USA (55%). Two-thirds of videos were aimed towards a patient audience. Overall, the content of 40% of videos related to cervical cancer, 94% related to radiation therapy including brachytherapy, and 51% directly related to the use of brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer. Only 15% of videos overviewed the patient-relevant information of brachytherapy side effects. Some videos (13%) were advertisements and few (4%) contained grossly inaccurate information. Videos collectively presented an overview of the treatments for cervical cancer including brachytherapy, although few included pertinent patient-relevant information and some contained inaccurate information. Overall, this highlights the need for more clear, accurate, and patient education-focused online resources.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.