Optimizing Administration and Timing of Post Intubation Analgesia and Sedation in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Robert Needleman, Sean Dyer, Kristen A Martinez, Joanne C Routsolias
{"title":"Optimizing Administration and Timing of Post Intubation Analgesia and Sedation in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Robert Needleman, Sean Dyer, Kristen A Martinez, Joanne C Routsolias","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent literature suggests pain management and sedation in ED patients after rapid sequence intubation are done inconsistently, which impacts patient outcomes negatively. The purpose of this study is to compare rates and timing of post-intubation analgesia and sedation before and after an ED pharmacy practice improvement intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of adult ED patients intubated over an 18-month period. The primary study endpoint was the frequency of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration before and after implementation of the post-intubation guideline and education. Secondary endpoints included time to analgesia and sedation medication after paralytic administration, comparison between paralytic drugs utilized (succinylcholine and rocuronium), and ED length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to intervention, the mean percentage of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration was 58.6% and 94.3%, respectively. After paralytic administration, the time to dose of analgesia was 63 minutes (range 0-288) and 47 minutes for sedation medication (range 0-214). The mean length of stay in the emergency department was 298 minutes (range 12-3143). Following the intervention, 35 patients met inclusion criteria, and the mean percentage of analgesia and sedation administration was 77.1% and 91.4%, respectively. The mean time to analgesia administration improved to 22 minutes (range 0-123), and sedation improved to 20 minutes (range 0-284). The mean emergency department length of stay decreased to 204 minutes (range 46-469). When comparing paralytic used, mean time to analgesia and sedation was longer in those who received rocuronium compared to succinylcholine.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>An educational lecture along with a novel ED post-intubation clinical guideline improved rates and timing to analgesia and sedation. This provides a unique opportunity for emergency nurses to advocate for early analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.10.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recent literature suggests pain management and sedation in ED patients after rapid sequence intubation are done inconsistently, which impacts patient outcomes negatively. The purpose of this study is to compare rates and timing of post-intubation analgesia and sedation before and after an ED pharmacy practice improvement intervention.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of adult ED patients intubated over an 18-month period. The primary study endpoint was the frequency of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration before and after implementation of the post-intubation guideline and education. Secondary endpoints included time to analgesia and sedation medication after paralytic administration, comparison between paralytic drugs utilized (succinylcholine and rocuronium), and ED length of stay.

Results: Prior to intervention, the mean percentage of post-intubation analgesia and sedation administration was 58.6% and 94.3%, respectively. After paralytic administration, the time to dose of analgesia was 63 minutes (range 0-288) and 47 minutes for sedation medication (range 0-214). The mean length of stay in the emergency department was 298 minutes (range 12-3143). Following the intervention, 35 patients met inclusion criteria, and the mean percentage of analgesia and sedation administration was 77.1% and 91.4%, respectively. The mean time to analgesia administration improved to 22 minutes (range 0-123), and sedation improved to 20 minutes (range 0-284). The mean emergency department length of stay decreased to 204 minutes (range 46-469). When comparing paralytic used, mean time to analgesia and sedation was longer in those who received rocuronium compared to succinylcholine.

Discussion: An educational lecture along with a novel ED post-intubation clinical guideline improved rates and timing to analgesia and sedation. This provides a unique opportunity for emergency nurses to advocate for early analgesia and sedation in mechanically ventilated patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信