Low-dose-rate, high-dose-rate, and pulsed-dose-rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: The very first comparison study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI:10.5114/jcb.2024.142938
Daya Nand Sharma, Pavnesh Kumar, Vellaiyan Subramani, Prashanth Giridhar
{"title":"Low-dose-rate, high-dose-rate, and pulsed-dose-rate intra-cavitary brachytherapy for cervical cancer: The very first comparison study.","authors":"Daya Nand Sharma, Pavnesh Kumar, Vellaiyan Subramani, Prashanth Giridhar","doi":"10.5114/jcb.2024.142938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For cervical cancer patients, intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is utilized with various dose-rate systems, such as low-dose-rate (LDR), high-dose-rate (HDR), and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR). This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with either LDR-, HDR-, or PDR-ICBT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 613 patients were treated with pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), followed by either LDR- (271 patients), HDR- (259 patients), or PDR- (83 patients) ICBT. Point-based planning was performed according to orthogonal radiographs in LDR patients, and computed tomography (CT) imaging in HDR and PDR patients. ICBT prescribed dose was as follows: for LDR treatment, 30 Gy in a single-session; for HDR: 7 Gy × 3 fractions (once a week fraction); and for PDR: 27 Gy in an hourly pulse of 70 cGy, with all the doses prescribed at point A. Radioactive source used was cesium-137 for LDR, and iridium-192 for HDR and PDR treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Loco-regional control (LRC) rate was 74%, 75%, and 77% in LDR, HDR, and PDR groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.80). The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the three groups, i.e., LDR, HDR, and PDR was 63%, 64%, and 68%, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.77). Severe late toxicity (RTOG grade ≥ 3) rate in the three groups was comparable (LDR, 12%; HDR, 8%; and PDR, 8.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study revealed comparable LRC, 5-year OS, and late toxicity rates using three dose-rate systems. Lower OS rates were observed in LDR group for stage III patients compared with patients in HDR and PDR groups. Therefore, we suggest that LDR should be used with caution while treating stage III patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","volume":"16 4","pages":"273-278"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11609853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2024.142938","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: For cervical cancer patients, intra-cavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) is utilized with various dose-rate systems, such as low-dose-rate (LDR), high-dose-rate (HDR), and pulsed-dose-rate (PDR). This retrospective analysis aimed to compare the therapeutic outcomes of cervical cancer patients treated with either LDR-, HDR-, or PDR-ICBT.

Material and methods: A total of 613 patients were treated with pelvic external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), followed by either LDR- (271 patients), HDR- (259 patients), or PDR- (83 patients) ICBT. Point-based planning was performed according to orthogonal radiographs in LDR patients, and computed tomography (CT) imaging in HDR and PDR patients. ICBT prescribed dose was as follows: for LDR treatment, 30 Gy in a single-session; for HDR: 7 Gy × 3 fractions (once a week fraction); and for PDR: 27 Gy in an hourly pulse of 70 cGy, with all the doses prescribed at point A. Radioactive source used was cesium-137 for LDR, and iridium-192 for HDR and PDR treatments.

Results: Loco-regional control (LRC) rate was 74%, 75%, and 77% in LDR, HDR, and PDR groups, respectively (p = 0.80). The 5-year overall survival (OS) in the three groups, i.e., LDR, HDR, and PDR was 63%, 64%, and 68%, respectively (p = 0.77). Severe late toxicity (RTOG grade ≥ 3) rate in the three groups was comparable (LDR, 12%; HDR, 8%; and PDR, 8.9%, p = 0.36).

Conclusions: Our study revealed comparable LRC, 5-year OS, and late toxicity rates using three dose-rate systems. Lower OS rates were observed in LDR group for stage III patients compared with patients in HDR and PDR groups. Therefore, we suggest that LDR should be used with caution while treating stage III patients.

低剂量率、高剂量率和脉冲剂量率腔内近距离治疗宫颈癌:首次比较研究。
目的:对于宫颈癌患者,腔内近距离放射治疗(ICBT)采用各种剂量率系统,如低剂量率(LDR),高剂量率(HDR)和脉冲剂量率(PDR)。本回顾性分析旨在比较LDR-、HDR-或PDR-ICBT治疗宫颈癌患者的治疗结果。材料和方法:共613例患者接受盆腔外束放射治疗(EBRT),随后进行LDR-(271例),HDR-(259例)或PDR-(83例)ICBT。根据LDR患者的正交x线片,HDR和PDR患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)成像进行点规划。ICBT处方剂量如下:LDR治疗,单次30 Gy;HDR: 7 Gy × 3分数(每周一次分数);对于PDR:每小时70 cGy脉冲27 Gy,所有剂量在a点规定。用于LDR治疗的放射源是铯-137,用于HDR和PDR治疗的放射源是铱-192。结果:LDR、HDR、PDR组局部-区域控制率分别为74%、75%、77% (p = 0.80)。LDR、HDR、PDR三组患者的5年总生存率(OS)分别为63%、64%、68% (p = 0.77)。三组的严重晚期毒性(RTOG分级≥3)率相当(LDR, 12%;HDR, 8%;PDR为8.9%,p = 0.36)。结论:我们的研究揭示了使用三种剂量率系统的可比较的LRC、5年OS和晚期毒性率。与HDR和PDR组相比,LDR组III期患者的OS率较低。因此,我们建议在治疗III期患者时应谨慎使用LDR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy
Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The “Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy” is an international and multidisciplinary journal that will publish papers of original research as well as reviews of articles. Main subjects of the journal include: clinical brachytherapy, combined modality treatment, advances in radiobiology, hyperthermia and tumour biology, as well as physical aspects relevant to brachytherapy, particularly in the field of imaging, dosimetry and radiation therapy planning. Original contributions will include experimental studies of combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization and normal tissue protection, molecular radiation biology, and clinical investigations of cancer treatment in brachytherapy. Another field of interest will be the educational part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信