Martin Segeroth, Hanns-Christian Breit, Jakob Wasserthal, Michael Bach, Cyrill Rentsch, Marc Matthias, Christian Wetterauer, Elmar Max Merkle, Daniel Tobias Boll
{"title":"AI-Based Evaluation of Prostate MR Imaging at a Modern Low-field 0.55 T Scanner Compared to 3 T in a Screening Cohort.","authors":"Martin Segeroth, Hanns-Christian Breit, Jakob Wasserthal, Michael Bach, Cyrill Rentsch, Marc Matthias, Christian Wetterauer, Elmar Max Merkle, Daniel Tobias Boll","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of lower field strength on quantitative apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ADC) values, contrast of the T2-weighted MR images and the performance of an AI-based segmentation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>25 screening clients (61.6 ± 7.5 years) from a study on a 3 T scanner were included and underwent a second examination on a 0.55 T scanner. Axial T2 weighted and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) sequences were acquired. An AI-based segmentation was performed. Based on this, the segmentation, volumetry, ADC values and the ratio of central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ) in T2 weighting were compared by using correlations coefficient (Pearson), Bland-Altman plots and a non-inferior test with a paired t-test and a margin of ± 20% (lower and upper boundary).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Volumetric assessment (peripheral zone//central gland) showed no significant (p = 0.13//0.38) difference between 3 T (mean volume: 14.81 (12.53-17.09)//23.07 (15.06-31.08)mL) and 0.55 T (mean volume of 14.29 (12.03-16.54; p = 0.13)//22.77 (14.41-31.12)mL). The deviation of the 0.55 T ADC values from the 3 T values was -10.14% (-16.09% to -4.18%) for the PZ and -4.68% (-10.12-0.76%) for the CG. Therefore, all confidence intervals remained within a margin of + /- 20% and thus demonstrated significant non-inferiority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Biparametric prostate imaging is feasible at 0.55 T: ADC values vary within a common inter-scanner range compared to a 3 T and no difference can be observed regarding contrast ratio between peripheral zone and central gland in T2 weighted images, volumetry and AI-based segmentation compared to 3 T.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of lower field strength on quantitative apparent-diffusion-coefficient (ADC) values, contrast of the T2-weighted MR images and the performance of an AI-based segmentation.
Materials and methods: 25 screening clients (61.6 ± 7.5 years) from a study on a 3 T scanner were included and underwent a second examination on a 0.55 T scanner. Axial T2 weighted and diffusion-weighted images (DWI) sequences were acquired. An AI-based segmentation was performed. Based on this, the segmentation, volumetry, ADC values and the ratio of central gland (CG) and peripheral zone (PZ) in T2 weighting were compared by using correlations coefficient (Pearson), Bland-Altman plots and a non-inferior test with a paired t-test and a margin of ± 20% (lower and upper boundary).
Results: Volumetric assessment (peripheral zone//central gland) showed no significant (p = 0.13//0.38) difference between 3 T (mean volume: 14.81 (12.53-17.09)//23.07 (15.06-31.08)mL) and 0.55 T (mean volume of 14.29 (12.03-16.54; p = 0.13)//22.77 (14.41-31.12)mL). The deviation of the 0.55 T ADC values from the 3 T values was -10.14% (-16.09% to -4.18%) for the PZ and -4.68% (-10.12-0.76%) for the CG. Therefore, all confidence intervals remained within a margin of + /- 20% and thus demonstrated significant non-inferiority.
Conclusion: Biparametric prostate imaging is feasible at 0.55 T: ADC values vary within a common inter-scanner range compared to a 3 T and no difference can be observed regarding contrast ratio between peripheral zone and central gland in T2 weighted images, volumetry and AI-based segmentation compared to 3 T.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.