Building a culture of quality in maternal and newborn health: experience from the quality, equity and dignity network in Ethiopia.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Global Health Action Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1080/16549716.2024.2433576
Anene Tesfa Berhanu, Asebe Amenu Tufa, Seblewengel Lemma, Geremew Gonfa, Theodros Getachew, Desalegn Bekele, Fitsum Kibret, Nehla Djellouli, Tim Colbourn, Tanya Marchant
{"title":"Building a culture of quality in maternal and newborn health: experience from the quality, equity and dignity network in Ethiopia.","authors":"Anene Tesfa Berhanu, Asebe Amenu Tufa, Seblewengel Lemma, Geremew Gonfa, Theodros Getachew, Desalegn Bekele, Fitsum Kibret, Nehla Djellouli, Tim Colbourn, Tanya Marchant","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2024.2433576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Building a culture of quality is vital for sustaining high-quality healthcare, emphasising shared values and continuous improvement. The Quality Equity and Dignity (QED) network was a global initiative working toward this objective, focusing on maternal and newborn health. This paper aims to describe how QED influenced five identified attributes of quality culture in Ethiopia: leadership, people-centered interventions, collaboration, rewards, and ownership towards building and sustaining a culture of quality in healthcare establishments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative study, conducted at two points six months apart, incorporated data from key informant interviews, observations, and document reviews. It included 18 national and 22 sub-national key informant interviews, seven facility observations, and one technical working group meeting observation. Data analysis was performed using NVivo 12 software, focusing on identified thematic areas related to quality culture.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Leadership was crucial for building a quality culture in Ethiopia, and the QED network strengthened government leadership structures, although leadership capacity and staff turnover were challenges. QED enhanced people-centered care and data tracking, but the added data focus burdened healthcare workers. Opportunities for collaboration and shared learning were facilitated, although not accessible to all actors. Motivation and rewards encouraged good performance, but addressing intrinsic behavioral change remained a challenge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving high-quality healthcare involves more than tools and infrastructure; it requires a cultural shift with behavior change consistently demonstrated at various levels. The QED network faced challenges in building a culture of quality but serves as an exemplary initiative for other networks to learn from.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"17 1","pages":"2433576"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2024.2433576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Building a culture of quality is vital for sustaining high-quality healthcare, emphasising shared values and continuous improvement. The Quality Equity and Dignity (QED) network was a global initiative working toward this objective, focusing on maternal and newborn health. This paper aims to describe how QED influenced five identified attributes of quality culture in Ethiopia: leadership, people-centered interventions, collaboration, rewards, and ownership towards building and sustaining a culture of quality in healthcare establishments.

Methods: This qualitative study, conducted at two points six months apart, incorporated data from key informant interviews, observations, and document reviews. It included 18 national and 22 sub-national key informant interviews, seven facility observations, and one technical working group meeting observation. Data analysis was performed using NVivo 12 software, focusing on identified thematic areas related to quality culture.

Result: Leadership was crucial for building a quality culture in Ethiopia, and the QED network strengthened government leadership structures, although leadership capacity and staff turnover were challenges. QED enhanced people-centered care and data tracking, but the added data focus burdened healthcare workers. Opportunities for collaboration and shared learning were facilitated, although not accessible to all actors. Motivation and rewards encouraged good performance, but addressing intrinsic behavioral change remained a challenge.

Conclusion: Achieving high-quality healthcare involves more than tools and infrastructure; it requires a cultural shift with behavior change consistently demonstrated at various levels. The QED network faced challenges in building a culture of quality but serves as an exemplary initiative for other networks to learn from.

在孕产妇和新生儿保健方面建立高质量文化:来自埃塞俄比亚质量、公平和尊严网络的经验。
背景:建立质量文化对于维持高质量的医疗保健至关重要,强调共同的价值观和持续改进。质量、公平和尊严(QED)网络是一项致力于实现这一目标的全球倡议,重点关注孕产妇和新生儿健康。本文旨在描述QED如何影响埃塞俄比亚质量文化的五个确定属性:领导力,以人为本的干预措施,协作,奖励和所有权,以建立和维持医疗机构的质量文化。方法:本定性研究在相隔六个月的两个时间点进行,纳入了来自关键信息提供者访谈、观察和文件审查的数据。它包括18个国家和22个地方关键举报人访谈,7个设施观察和1个技术工作组会议观察。使用NVivo 12软件进行数据分析,重点关注与质量文化相关的确定主题领域。结果:领导力对于在埃塞俄比亚建立质量文化至关重要,QED网络加强了政府领导结构,尽管领导能力和人员流动是挑战。QED增强了以人为中心的护理和数据跟踪,但增加的数据关注点给医护人员带来了负担。促进了协作和共享学习的机会,尽管并非所有行为体都能获得。激励和奖励鼓励良好的表现,但解决内在的行为改变仍然是一个挑战。结论:实现高质量的医疗保健不仅仅涉及工具和基础设施;这需要文化上的转变,行为上的改变在各个层面上都能持续体现出来。优质教育教育网络在建立优质文化方面面临挑战,但它是其他网络学习的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Action
Global Health Action PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research. Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health. Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信