Pre-hospital management of penetrating neck injuries: derivation of an algorithm through a National Modified Delphi.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christopher Simpson, Harriet Tucker, Joanne Griggs, Maja Gavrilovski, Richard Lyon, Anthony Hudson
{"title":"Pre-hospital management of penetrating neck injuries: derivation of an algorithm through a National Modified Delphi.","authors":"Christopher Simpson, Harriet Tucker, Joanne Griggs, Maja Gavrilovski, Richard Lyon, Anthony Hudson","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01291-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely and effective pre-hospital management of penetrating neck injuries (PNI) is critical to improve patient outcomes. Pre-hospital interventions in patients with PNI can be especially challenging due to the anatomical injury site coupled with a resource-limited environment. Nationally, in the United Kingdom, no consensus statement or expert agreed guidance exists on how to best manage PNI in the pre-hospital setting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a national modified e-Delphi study with subject matter experts (SMEs) from multiple professional specialities with experience in the management of PNI. Pre-identified SMEs were contacted and consented prior to participation allowing for a remotely conducted Delphi using REDCap and Microsoft Teams. In Round 1, statements drawn from the literature base were distributed to all SMEs. Round 2 comprised a facilitated and structured discussion of the statements and then an online survey provided final ratification in Round 3. Of the participating SMEs consensus was set a priori at 70%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 67 pre-identified SMEs, 28 participated, resulting in a response rate of 42%. From the first two rounds, 19 statements were derived with every statement achieving consensus in Round 3. Subsequently, an algorithm for the pre-hospital management of PNI was developed and agreed with SME consensus.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Curation of national consensus statements from SMEs aims to provide principles and guidance for PNI management in a complicated patient group where pre-hospital evidence is lacking. Multi-professional national consensus on the best approach to manage these injuries alongside a novel PNI management algorithm aims to optimise time critical care and by extension improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01291-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely and effective pre-hospital management of penetrating neck injuries (PNI) is critical to improve patient outcomes. Pre-hospital interventions in patients with PNI can be especially challenging due to the anatomical injury site coupled with a resource-limited environment. Nationally, in the United Kingdom, no consensus statement or expert agreed guidance exists on how to best manage PNI in the pre-hospital setting.

Method: We conducted a national modified e-Delphi study with subject matter experts (SMEs) from multiple professional specialities with experience in the management of PNI. Pre-identified SMEs were contacted and consented prior to participation allowing for a remotely conducted Delphi using REDCap and Microsoft Teams. In Round 1, statements drawn from the literature base were distributed to all SMEs. Round 2 comprised a facilitated and structured discussion of the statements and then an online survey provided final ratification in Round 3. Of the participating SMEs consensus was set a priori at 70%.

Results: Of the 67 pre-identified SMEs, 28 participated, resulting in a response rate of 42%. From the first two rounds, 19 statements were derived with every statement achieving consensus in Round 3. Subsequently, an algorithm for the pre-hospital management of PNI was developed and agreed with SME consensus.

Conclusion: Curation of national consensus statements from SMEs aims to provide principles and guidance for PNI management in a complicated patient group where pre-hospital evidence is lacking. Multi-professional national consensus on the best approach to manage these injuries alongside a novel PNI management algorithm aims to optimise time critical care and by extension improve patient outcomes.

穿透性颈部损伤的院前管理:通过国家修正德尔菲算法的推导。
背景:及时有效的院前处理穿透性颈部损伤(PNI)是改善患者预后的关键。由于解剖损伤部位和资源有限的环境,对PNI患者的院前干预尤其具有挑战性。在全国范围内,在联合王国,没有关于如何在院前环境中最好地管理PNI的共识声明或专家商定的指南。方法:我们与具有PNI管理经验的多个专业的主题专家(sme)进行了一项全国修改的e-Delphi研究。在参与之前,我们联系了预先确定的中小企业,并征得了他们的同意,允许使用REDCap和Microsoft Teams进行远程Delphi。在第一轮中,从文献库中抽取的说明分发给所有中小企业。第二轮包括对声明进行便利和有组织的讨论,然后在第三轮进行在线调查,以提供最终批准。在参与的中小企业中,70%的人的共识是先验设定的。结果:在67家预先确定的中小企业中,有28家参与,回复率为42%。从前两轮中得出19项声明,每项声明都在第三轮中达成共识。随后,开发了一种用于PNI院前管理的算法,并与SME共识一致。结论:整理来自中小企业的全国共识声明旨在为缺乏院前证据的复杂患者群体的PNI管理提供原则和指导。在管理这些损伤的最佳方法上,多专业的国家共识以及一种新的PNI管理算法旨在优化重症监护时间,并通过扩展改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信