Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements.

IF 2.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Lawson David Gillespie, Sébastien Ars, Samantha Alkadri, Siyar Urya, Timothy Khoo, Susan Fraser, Felix Vogel, Debra Wunch
{"title":"Estimating methane emissions from the waste sector in Southern Ontario using atmospheric measurements.","authors":"Lawson David Gillespie, Sébastien Ars, Samantha Alkadri, Siyar Urya, Timothy Khoo, Susan Fraser, Felix Vogel, Debra Wunch","doi":"10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We estimate methane emissions for urban waste treatment facilities from mobile in situ atmospheric concentration measurements using an inverse Gaussian plume methodology at facilities in Southern Ontario, Canada. We use these emission rates to assess and improve the existing high-resolution methane inventories for waste sources throughout Southwestern Ontario. Our measurements encompass tens of thousands of kilometres worth of mobile survey data collected over 7 years, including more than 650 downwind transects where we surveyed 14 active landfills, 11 closed landfills, 2 organic waste processing facilities, 3 open-air windrow compost facilities, and 11 water resource recovery facilities. These sources account for 77% of the active landfills within Southern Ontario, which is estimated in inventories to be the largest source of methane emissions in the region. Within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) megacity, the measured facilities represent about 52% of the total inventoried non-wetland methane emissions. We find that emissions from closed landfills are lower than inventory estimates, with significant implications for the methane budget in the GTA. We update the Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions for the GTA inventory with our measured emissions rates, which results in a 54% decline in the solid waste emissions, effecting a 35% lower estimate for the total anthropogenic methane emissions in the region. We attribute the bulk of this difference to a single facility: the Keele Valley landfill. Our atmospheric measurements serve as a metric for evaluating the discrepancies between four facility level and two high resolution gridded methane emission inventories. We find that the facility level first-order decay model maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) to be the most consistent with our measured emission rates at landfills, and the self-reported emissions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program of ECCC to be the least consistent with our measurements.<i>Implications:</i> We present estimates of atmospheric measurement derived methane emissions for multiple waste processing facilities in Canada. We investigate six emission inventories and models. Based on our atmospheric observations of landfills, we show that the self-reported methane emissions are not well correlated with our measured emissions, and that the first order decay models used in official emissions reporting are much better correlated. One of the most critical findings in this work is that methane emissions from the Keele Valley Landfill, assumed in some inventories to be the second largest anthropogenic source of methane in the country, are significantly less than predicted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","volume":" ","pages":"144-163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2024.2435340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimate methane emissions for urban waste treatment facilities from mobile in situ atmospheric concentration measurements using an inverse Gaussian plume methodology at facilities in Southern Ontario, Canada. We use these emission rates to assess and improve the existing high-resolution methane inventories for waste sources throughout Southwestern Ontario. Our measurements encompass tens of thousands of kilometres worth of mobile survey data collected over 7 years, including more than 650 downwind transects where we surveyed 14 active landfills, 11 closed landfills, 2 organic waste processing facilities, 3 open-air windrow compost facilities, and 11 water resource recovery facilities. These sources account for 77% of the active landfills within Southern Ontario, which is estimated in inventories to be the largest source of methane emissions in the region. Within the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) megacity, the measured facilities represent about 52% of the total inventoried non-wetland methane emissions. We find that emissions from closed landfills are lower than inventory estimates, with significant implications for the methane budget in the GTA. We update the Facility Level and Area Methane Emissions for the GTA inventory with our measured emissions rates, which results in a 54% decline in the solid waste emissions, effecting a 35% lower estimate for the total anthropogenic methane emissions in the region. We attribute the bulk of this difference to a single facility: the Keele Valley landfill. Our atmospheric measurements serve as a metric for evaluating the discrepancies between four facility level and two high resolution gridded methane emission inventories. We find that the facility level first-order decay model maintained by Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) to be the most consistent with our measured emission rates at landfills, and the self-reported emissions to the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program of ECCC to be the least consistent with our measurements.Implications: We present estimates of atmospheric measurement derived methane emissions for multiple waste processing facilities in Canada. We investigate six emission inventories and models. Based on our atmospheric observations of landfills, we show that the self-reported methane emissions are not well correlated with our measured emissions, and that the first order decay models used in official emissions reporting are much better correlated. One of the most critical findings in this work is that methane emissions from the Keele Valley Landfill, assumed in some inventories to be the second largest anthropogenic source of methane in the country, are significantly less than predicted.

利用大气测量估计安大略省南部废物部门的甲烷排放量。
我们使用反高斯羽流方法在加拿大安大略省南部的设施中通过移动原位大气浓度测量来估计城市废物处理设施的甲烷排放率。我们使用这些估计的排放率来调查、更新和改进整个大多伦多地区和安大略省西南部废物源的现有设施水平的高分辨率甲烷清单。我们的测量包含了7年来收集的数万公里的移动调查数据,包括650多个顺风样带,我们调查了整个研究区域内14个活跃的垃圾填埋场,11个封闭的垃圾填埋场,2个有机废物处理设施,3个露天窗口堆肥设施和11个水资源回收设施。这些来源占安大略省南部活跃垃圾填埋场的77%,据库存估计,这是该地区最大的甲烷排放来源。在大多伦多地区(GTA)特大城市中,测量的设施约占非湿地甲烷排放总量的52%。我们发现,封闭垃圾填埋场的排放量低于库存估算值,这对大多伦多地区的甲烷预算具有重要意义。我们用我们测量的排放率更新了GTA清单的设施水平和区域甲烷排放量,这使得固体废物排放量下降了54%,从而使该地区的人为甲烷排放总量降低了35%。我们将这种差异的大部分归因于一个单一的设施:基尔谷垃圾填埋场。我们的大气测量也可以作为评估四个设施水平和两个高分辨率网格甲烷排放清单之间差异的新指标。基于我们测量的排放量与清单值的线性回归,我们发现加拿大环境与气候变化(ECCC)维护的设施一级衰减模型与我们测量的垃圾填埋场排放率最一致,而ECCC温室气体报告计划的自我报告排放量与我们的测量结果最不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
95
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (J&AWMA) is one of the oldest continuously published, peer-reviewed, technical environmental journals in the world. First published in 1951 under the name Air Repair, J&AWMA is intended to serve those occupationally involved in air pollution control and waste management through the publication of timely and reliable information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信