Diagnostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and albumin-to-globulin ratio for periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Chun-Ching Chen, Yu-Pin Chen, Yi-Jie Kuo, Yu-Cheng Liu, Shu-Wei Huang
{"title":"Diagnostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and albumin-to-globulin ratio for periprosthetic joint infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chun-Ching Chen, Yu-Pin Chen, Yi-Jie Kuo, Yu-Cheng Liu, Shu-Wei Huang","doi":"10.1530/EOR-23-0206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint arthroplasty, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) are novel diagnostic markers for PJI; however, their diagnostic value remains inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases to determine the diagnostic accuracy of NLR and AGR for PJI in the knee or hip. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently completed by two reviewers. The pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC), and area under the sROC curve (AUC) were assessed using the univariate meta-analysis framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen eligible studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of NLR for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.77) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.77), respectively. Its pooled DOR was 6.89 (95% CI: 5.03-9.43), and AUC was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AGR for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79-0.87), respectively. Its DOR was 17.69 (95% CI: 10.76-29.07), and AUC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLR and AGR can be individually used as reliable serum biomarkers for the detection of PJI. Future research is warranted to determine the diagnostic value of these markers in combination with C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rates to improve diagnostic accuracy for PJI in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"9 12","pages":"1134-1143"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication after joint arthroplasty, resulting in high morbidity and mortality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and albumin-to-globulin ratio (AGR) are novel diagnostic markers for PJI; however, their diagnostic value remains inconsistent.

Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases to determine the diagnostic accuracy of NLR and AGR for PJI in the knee or hip. Data extraction and quality assessment were independently completed by two reviewers. The pooled sensitivity and specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC), and area under the sROC curve (AUC) were assessed using the univariate meta-analysis framework.

Results: Nineteen eligible studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of NLR for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.77) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.77), respectively. Its pooled DOR was 6.89 (95% CI: 5.03-9.43), and AUC was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AGR for the diagnosis of PJI were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.88) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79-0.87), respectively. Its DOR was 17.69 (95% CI: 10.76-29.07), and AUC was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91).

Conclusion: NLR and AGR can be individually used as reliable serum biomarkers for the detection of PJI. Future research is warranted to determine the diagnostic value of these markers in combination with C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rates to improve diagnostic accuracy for PJI in clinical practice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信