Can bile excretion on Gd-EOB-MRI be used as a visual criterion for the hepatobiliary phase?

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Masafumi Nakamura, Yasuo Takatsu, Mutsumi Yoshizawa, Satoshi Kobayashi, Tosiaki Miyati
{"title":"Can bile excretion on Gd-EOB-MRI be used as a visual criterion for the hepatobiliary phase?","authors":"Masafumi Nakamura, Yasuo Takatsu, Mutsumi Yoshizawa, Satoshi Kobayashi, Tosiaki Miyati","doi":"10.1007/s12194-024-00868-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine whether visually observed biliary excretion of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) can be used to assess contrast adequacy of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Images of 121 patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were used. Adequate HBP images were defined as a quantitative liver-spleen contrast ratio (Q-LSC) ≥ 1.5. Visual evaluation was performed to determine if an adequate HBP image could be obtained based on the presence or absence of bile excretion. Common bile duct-paravertebral contrast (CPC) was used to assess the degree of bile excretion, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade was used to assess liver reserve, and the Q-LSC was used to assess HBP image contrast. The results were used to quantitatively evaluate the relationships of the degree of bile excretion with HBP image contrast and liver reserve. The cases correctly determined by visual evaluation via bile excretion were 80 (66.1%) at HBP 10 min after injection and 89 (73.6%) at HBP 20 min after injection. Among cases with Q-LSC ≥ 1.5 indicating bile excretion, there were 33 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 86 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Furthermore, among cases with Q-LSC < 1.5, indicating no bile excretion, there were 47 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 3 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Visually observed biliary excretion of Gd-EOB-DTPA is not a criterion for adequate HBP image contrast.</p>","PeriodicalId":46252,"journal":{"name":"Radiological Physics and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiological Physics and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00868-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To determine whether visually observed biliary excretion of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) can be used to assess contrast adequacy of hepatobiliary phase (HBP) images. Images of 121 patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging were used. Adequate HBP images were defined as a quantitative liver-spleen contrast ratio (Q-LSC) ≥ 1.5. Visual evaluation was performed to determine if an adequate HBP image could be obtained based on the presence or absence of bile excretion. Common bile duct-paravertebral contrast (CPC) was used to assess the degree of bile excretion, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade was used to assess liver reserve, and the Q-LSC was used to assess HBP image contrast. The results were used to quantitatively evaluate the relationships of the degree of bile excretion with HBP image contrast and liver reserve. The cases correctly determined by visual evaluation via bile excretion were 80 (66.1%) at HBP 10 min after injection and 89 (73.6%) at HBP 20 min after injection. Among cases with Q-LSC ≥ 1.5 indicating bile excretion, there were 33 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 86 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Furthermore, among cases with Q-LSC < 1.5, indicating no bile excretion, there were 47 cases at HBP 10 min after injection and 3 cases at HBP 20 min after injection. Visually observed biliary excretion of Gd-EOB-DTPA is not a criterion for adequate HBP image contrast.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiological Physics and Technology
Radiological Physics and Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The purpose of the journal Radiological Physics and Technology is to provide a forum for sharing new knowledge related to research and development in radiological science and technology, including medical physics and radiological technology in diagnostic radiology, nuclear medicine, and radiation therapy among many other radiological disciplines, as well as to contribute to progress and improvement in medical practice and patient health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信