Routine 36-week scan: diagnosis and outcome of abnormal fetal presentation.

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1002/uog.29139
M Fitiri, D Papavasileiou, V Mesaric, A Syngelaki, R Akolekar, K H Nicolaides
{"title":"Routine 36-week scan: diagnosis and outcome of abnormal fetal presentation.","authors":"M Fitiri, D Papavasileiou, V Mesaric, A Syngelaki, R Akolekar, K H Nicolaides","doi":"10.1002/uog.29139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>First, to report the incidence of non-cephalic presentation at a routine 36-week ultrasound scan, the uptake and success of external cephalic version (ECV) and the incidence of spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation. Second, to determine the maternal and pregnancy characteristics that provide a significant contribution to the prediction of non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, successful ECV from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation and spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 107 875 women with a singleton pregnancy who had undergone a routine ultrasound scan at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Patients with breech or transverse/oblique presentation were divided into two groups: those scheduled for elective Cesarean section for a fetal or maternal indication other than abnormal presentation, and those that would potentially require ECV. The latter group was reassessed after 1-2 weeks and, if the abnormal presentation persisted, the parents were offered ECV or elective Cesarean section at 38-40 weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine which maternal and pregnancy characteristics provided a significant contribution in the prediction of non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, successful ECV from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation and spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the 36-week scan, fetal presentation was cephalic in 101 664 (94.2%) pregnancies and either breech, transverse or oblique in 6211 (5.8%). In 0.3% of cases with cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, there was subsequent spontaneous rotation to non-cephalic presentation, and in half of these, the diagnosis was made during labor or at birth. ECV was attempted in 1584/6211 (25.5%) pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan and was successful in only 44.1% of cases. In the remaining 74.5% of cases, ECV was not attempted because of any of the following reasons: ECV was declined; Cesarean section was planned for a reason other than abnormal presentation; ECV was planned for the subsequent 1-2 weeks but, in the meantime, there was spontaneous rotation to cephalic presentation; or there was spontaneous onset of labor or rupture of membranes before planned ECV. In 5513/6211 (88.8%) pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, ECV was not attempted or was unsuccessful, and in 37.7% of these, there was subsequent spontaneous rotation to cephalic presentation. Among the 6211 pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, the presentation at birth was cephalic in 43.8%; in 74.8%, this was due to spontaneous rotation, and in 25.2%, it was due to successful ECV. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, that of successful ECV and that of spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation was affected by several maternal and pregnancy characteristics, but the predictive performance for these events was poor, with the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve ranging from 0.608 to 0.717 and the detection rate at a 10% false-positive rate ranging from 19.0% to 33.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Routine ultrasound examination at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation could improve pregnancy outcome by substantially reducing the risk of unexpected abnormal presentation in labor. However, an additional ultrasound scan for fetal presentation should be considered in all women when they present in labor. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"154-162"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29139","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: First, to report the incidence of non-cephalic presentation at a routine 36-week ultrasound scan, the uptake and success of external cephalic version (ECV) and the incidence of spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation. Second, to determine the maternal and pregnancy characteristics that provide a significant contribution to the prediction of non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, successful ECV from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation and spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 107 875 women with a singleton pregnancy who had undergone a routine ultrasound scan at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Patients with breech or transverse/oblique presentation were divided into two groups: those scheduled for elective Cesarean section for a fetal or maternal indication other than abnormal presentation, and those that would potentially require ECV. The latter group was reassessed after 1-2 weeks and, if the abnormal presentation persisted, the parents were offered ECV or elective Cesarean section at 38-40 weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out to determine which maternal and pregnancy characteristics provided a significant contribution in the prediction of non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, successful ECV from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation and spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation.

Results: At the 36-week scan, fetal presentation was cephalic in 101 664 (94.2%) pregnancies and either breech, transverse or oblique in 6211 (5.8%). In 0.3% of cases with cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, there was subsequent spontaneous rotation to non-cephalic presentation, and in half of these, the diagnosis was made during labor or at birth. ECV was attempted in 1584/6211 (25.5%) pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan and was successful in only 44.1% of cases. In the remaining 74.5% of cases, ECV was not attempted because of any of the following reasons: ECV was declined; Cesarean section was planned for a reason other than abnormal presentation; ECV was planned for the subsequent 1-2 weeks but, in the meantime, there was spontaneous rotation to cephalic presentation; or there was spontaneous onset of labor or rupture of membranes before planned ECV. In 5513/6211 (88.8%) pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, ECV was not attempted or was unsuccessful, and in 37.7% of these, there was subsequent spontaneous rotation to cephalic presentation. Among the 6211 pregnancies with non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, the presentation at birth was cephalic in 43.8%; in 74.8%, this was due to spontaneous rotation, and in 25.2%, it was due to successful ECV. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that the likelihood of non-cephalic presentation at the 36-week scan, that of successful ECV and that of spontaneous rotation from non-cephalic to cephalic presentation was affected by several maternal and pregnancy characteristics, but the predictive performance for these events was poor, with the area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve ranging from 0.608 to 0.717 and the detection rate at a 10% false-positive rate ranging from 19.0% to 33.7%.

Conclusions: Routine ultrasound examination at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation could improve pregnancy outcome by substantially reducing the risk of unexpected abnormal presentation in labor. However, an additional ultrasound scan for fetal presentation should be considered in all women when they present in labor. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

常规36周扫描:异常胎儿形态的诊断和结局。
目的:首先,报告在常规36周超声扫描中出现非头位表现的发生率,头外显像(ECV)的接受和成功,以及从非头位到头位的自发旋转的发生率。其次,确定在36周扫描时对预测非头位表现有重要贡献的产妇和妊娠特征,从非头位到头位的成功ECV以及从非头位到头位的自发旋转。方法:回顾性分析前瞻性收集的107875例单胎妊娠妇女的资料,这些妇女在妊娠35 + 0至36 + 6周期间接受了常规超声扫描。臀位或横位/斜位剖宫产的患者被分为两组:因胎儿或母体指征而非异常剖宫产的患者和可能需要ECV的患者。后一组在1-2周后重新评估,如果异常表现持续存在,父母在妊娠38-40周进行ECV或择期剖宫产。进行多变量logistic回归分析,以确定哪些母体和妊娠特征在预测36周扫描时的非头位表现、成功的ECV从非头位表现到头位表现以及从非头位到头位表现的自发旋转方面提供了重要贡献。结果:在36周的扫描中,101,664例(94.2%)孕妇胎儿为头位,6211例(5.8%)胎儿为臀位、横位或斜位。在36周扫描时出现头位的病例中,有0.3%的病例随后自发转到非头位,其中一半的病例是在分娩或出生时诊断的。在1584/6211例(25.5%)孕妇中,在36周扫描时出现非头侧表现,尝试ECV,成功率仅为44.1%。在其余74.5%的病例中,由于以下任何原因,没有尝试ECV: ECV被拒绝;剖宫产并非因胎位异常所致;ECV计划在随后的1-2周内进行,但在此期间,出现了自发的向头位旋转;或在计划ECV前出现自发性分娩或胎膜破裂。在5513/6211例(88.8%)在36周扫描时出现非头位的妊娠中,没有尝试ECV或未成功,其中37.7%的妊娠随后自发旋转至头位。在6211例在36周扫描时出现非头位表现的孕妇中,出生时出现头位表现的占43.8%;74.8%是由于自发旋转,25.2%是由于成功的ECV。多变量分析表明,36周扫描时出现非头位的可能性、ECV成功出现的可能性以及从非头位到头位的自发旋转的可能性受到一些母体和妊娠特征的影响,但这些事件的预测性能较差,受体-操作-特征曲线下面积范围为0.608 ~ 0.717,10%的假阳性率检出率范围为19.0% ~ 33.7%。结论:妊娠35 + 0 ~ 36 + 6周常规超声检查可显著降低产程出现意外异常的风险,改善妊娠结局。然而,当所有妇女在分娩时,应考虑对胎儿进行额外的超声扫描。©2024作者。妇产科学超声由John Wiley & Sons Ltd代表国际妇产科学超声学会出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信