Use of Parenteral Antibiotics in Emergency Departments: Practice Patterns and Class Concordance.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Megan Elli, Timothy Molinarolo, Aidan Mullan, Laura Walker
{"title":"Use of Parenteral Antibiotics in Emergency Departments: Practice Patterns and Class Concordance.","authors":"Megan Elli, Timothy Molinarolo, Aidan Mullan, Laura Walker","doi":"10.5811/westjem.17998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to assess antibiotic stewardship by quantifying the use of first-dose intravenous (IV) vs oral-only antibiotics and the frequency with which antibiotic class was changed for discharged patients. Secondary aims included the following: evaluation of the relative length of stay (LOS); differences in prescribing patterns between clinician types; differences between academic and community settings; assessment of prescribing patterns among emergency department (ED) diagnoses; and frequency of return visits for patients in each group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study including patients presenting to EDs with infections who were discharged from our Midwest healthcare system consisting of 17 community hospitals and one academic center. We included infection type, antibiotic class and route of administration, type of infection, LOS, return visit within two weeks, clinician type, and demographics. Data were collected between June 1, 2018-December 31, 2021 and analyzed using descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We had 77,204 ED visits for patients with infections during the study period, of whom 3,812 received IV antibiotics during their visit. There were more women (62.4%) than men included. Of the 3,812 patients who received IV antibiotics, 1,026 (34.3%) were discharged on a different class of antibiotics than they received. The most common changes were from IV cephalosporin to oral quinolone or penicillin. Patients treated with IV antibiotics prior to discharge had a longer LOS in the ED (median difference of 102 minutes longer for those who received IV antibiotics). There was not a significant difference in the use of IV antibiotics between the academic center and community sites included in the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering IV antibiotics as a first dose prior to oral prescriptions upon discharge is common, as is shifting classes from the IV dose to the oral prescription. This offers an opportunity for intervention to improve antibiotic stewardship for ED patients as well as reduce cost and length of stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23682,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 6","pages":"966-974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.17998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to assess antibiotic stewardship by quantifying the use of first-dose intravenous (IV) vs oral-only antibiotics and the frequency with which antibiotic class was changed for discharged patients. Secondary aims included the following: evaluation of the relative length of stay (LOS); differences in prescribing patterns between clinician types; differences between academic and community settings; assessment of prescribing patterns among emergency department (ED) diagnoses; and frequency of return visits for patients in each group.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including patients presenting to EDs with infections who were discharged from our Midwest healthcare system consisting of 17 community hospitals and one academic center. We included infection type, antibiotic class and route of administration, type of infection, LOS, return visit within two weeks, clinician type, and demographics. Data were collected between June 1, 2018-December 31, 2021 and analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: We had 77,204 ED visits for patients with infections during the study period, of whom 3,812 received IV antibiotics during their visit. There were more women (62.4%) than men included. Of the 3,812 patients who received IV antibiotics, 1,026 (34.3%) were discharged on a different class of antibiotics than they received. The most common changes were from IV cephalosporin to oral quinolone or penicillin. Patients treated with IV antibiotics prior to discharge had a longer LOS in the ED (median difference of 102 minutes longer for those who received IV antibiotics). There was not a significant difference in the use of IV antibiotics between the academic center and community sites included in the study.

Conclusion: Administering IV antibiotics as a first dose prior to oral prescriptions upon discharge is common, as is shifting classes from the IV dose to the oral prescription. This offers an opportunity for intervention to improve antibiotic stewardship for ED patients as well as reduce cost and length of stay.

急诊科使用肠外抗生素:实践模式和类别一致性。
前言:我们的目的是通过量化首次静脉注射(IV)与口服抗生素的使用以及出院患者更换抗生素类别的频率来评估抗生素管理。次要目标包括:评估相对停留时间(LOS);不同临床类型医师处方模式的差异;学术和社区环境的差异;急诊诊断中处方模式的评价;以及每组患者的回访频率。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了从中西部医疗系统(包括17家社区医院和1家学术中心)出院的急诊感染患者。我们包括感染类型、抗生素种类和给药途径、感染类型、LOS、两周内复诊、临床医生类型和人口统计学。数据收集于2018年6月1日至2021年12月31日之间,并使用描述性统计进行分析。结果:在研究期间,我们有77,204例感染患者就诊,其中3,812例在就诊期间接受了静脉注射抗生素。其中女性(62.4%)比男性多。在接受静脉注射抗生素的3812例患者中,1026例(34.3%)出院时使用的抗生素种类与接受的不同。最常见的改变是从静脉注射头孢菌素到口服喹诺酮或青霉素。出院前接受静脉注射抗生素治疗的患者在急诊科的LOS较长(接受静脉注射抗生素治疗的患者的LOS中位数差为102分钟)。在研究的学术中心和社区站点之间,静脉注射抗生素的使用没有显著差异。结论:出院时在口服处方前给予静脉注射抗生素作为第一剂量是很常见的,从静脉注射剂量转移到口服处方也是很常见的。这为改善急诊科患者的抗生素管理以及降低成本和住院时间提供了干预机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
125
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: WestJEM focuses on how the systems and delivery of emergency care affects health, health disparities, and health outcomes in communities and populations worldwide, including the impact of social conditions on the composition of patients seeking care in emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信