Does indocyanine green fluorescence angiography reduce the risk of anastomotic leaks in colorectal resections? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Ahmed Elmajdub, Nahed Brebesh, Annis Maatough, Frank Willeke, Christel Weiss, Ibrahim Darwich
{"title":"Does indocyanine green fluorescence angiography reduce the risk of anastomotic leaks in colorectal resections? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Ahmed Elmajdub, Nahed Brebesh, Annis Maatough, Frank Willeke, Christel Weiss, Ibrahim Darwich","doi":"10.1007/s13304-024-02036-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anastomotic leaks are a significant complication in colorectal surgery. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) has been suggested as a method to reduce the risk. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of ICG-FA on reducing anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. This study follows PRISMA guidelines and is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022370748). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases and registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICG-FA with standard methods in colorectal surgery. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with a third resolving disputes. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using comprehensive meta-analysis software, version 3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The analysis included five RCTs with a total of 1369 patients from four countries. The ICG-FA was associated with a 45% reduction in the risk of overall anastomotic leaks (OR: 0.550, p = 0.012). Subgroup analysis showed a 47% reduction in leaks for low anastomoses (OR: 0.53, p = 0.143) and a 69% reduction in grade A leaks (OR: 0.31, p = 0.008). No significant effects were observed for grade B and C leaks, blood loss, surgery duration, hospital stay, mortality, postoperative ileus, reoperation, or surgical site infections. ICG-FA significantly reduces the overall risk of anastomotic leaks, especially grade A leaks, and shows a trend towards fewer leaks in low anastomosis. No significant impact was found on secondary outcomes. Further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-024-02036-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anastomotic leaks are a significant complication in colorectal surgery. Indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) has been suggested as a method to reduce the risk. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of ICG-FA on reducing anastomotic leaks in colorectal surgery. This study follows PRISMA guidelines and is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022370748). We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases and registers for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ICG-FA with standard methods in colorectal surgery. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers, with a third resolving disputes. Odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) were calculated using comprehensive meta-analysis software, version 3. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed, and a sensitivity analysis was performed. The analysis included five RCTs with a total of 1369 patients from four countries. The ICG-FA was associated with a 45% reduction in the risk of overall anastomotic leaks (OR: 0.550, p = 0.012). Subgroup analysis showed a 47% reduction in leaks for low anastomoses (OR: 0.53, p = 0.143) and a 69% reduction in grade A leaks (OR: 0.31, p = 0.008). No significant effects were observed for grade B and C leaks, blood loss, surgery duration, hospital stay, mortality, postoperative ileus, reoperation, or surgical site infections. ICG-FA significantly reduces the overall risk of anastomotic leaks, especially grade A leaks, and shows a trend towards fewer leaks in low anastomosis. No significant impact was found on secondary outcomes. Further RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信