Secondary Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnancy Intention.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Rebecca Grace, Savannah Cotter, Lauren Taylor, Di Miao, Sabeena Rahman, Bani M Ratan
{"title":"Secondary Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pregnancy Intention.","authors":"Rebecca Grace, Savannah Cotter, Lauren Taylor, Di Miao, Sabeena Rahman, Bani M Ratan","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had many downstream effects, including, for some women, altering the wish to become pregnant. This study examines the effects on pregnancy intention and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score at the initiation of prenatal care in a low-income population during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of cohorts of women initiating prenatal care at two large Medicaid clinics between May and November 2019 and May and November 2020 was performed. Women entering prenatal care before 20 weeks and carrying pregnancies to term were included. Charts were abstracted for pregnancy intention, demographics, medical history, and EPDS score. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to analyze pregnancy intention pre- and pandemic. EPDS scores were compared by unpaired <i>t</i> test in the unplanned pregnancies pre- and pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 462 women in the prepandemic cohort and 477 patients in the COVID pandemic cohort. During the pandemic, 53.04% (253/477) of women reported unplanned pregnancies, a significant increase from a baseline of 42.86% (198/462) of pregnancies prepandemic (<i>P</i> < 0.01, odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.20) when controlling for all other factors. Analysis of unplanned pregnancies specifically showed no significant differences in the demographic makeup pre- and pandemic. There also was no significant change in EPDS scores in unplanned pregnancies between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was a significant increase in the number of unplanned pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large Medicaid patient population, although the demographics of those having unplanned pregnancies and the average EPDS score did not change significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 12","pages":"686-689"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had many downstream effects, including, for some women, altering the wish to become pregnant. This study examines the effects on pregnancy intention and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score at the initiation of prenatal care in a low-income population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: A retrospective review of cohorts of women initiating prenatal care at two large Medicaid clinics between May and November 2019 and May and November 2020 was performed. Women entering prenatal care before 20 weeks and carrying pregnancies to term were included. Charts were abstracted for pregnancy intention, demographics, medical history, and EPDS score. Multivariate logistical regression analysis was used to analyze pregnancy intention pre- and pandemic. EPDS scores were compared by unpaired t test in the unplanned pregnancies pre- and pandemic.

Results: There were 462 women in the prepandemic cohort and 477 patients in the COVID pandemic cohort. During the pandemic, 53.04% (253/477) of women reported unplanned pregnancies, a significant increase from a baseline of 42.86% (198/462) of pregnancies prepandemic (P < 0.01, odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 1.19-2.20) when controlling for all other factors. Analysis of unplanned pregnancies specifically showed no significant differences in the demographic makeup pre- and pandemic. There also was no significant change in EPDS scores in unplanned pregnancies between the two cohorts.

Conclusions: There was a significant increase in the number of unplanned pregnancies during the COVID-19 pandemic in a large Medicaid patient population, although the demographics of those having unplanned pregnancies and the average EPDS score did not change significantly.

COVID-19大流行对妊娠意向的次要影响
2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行产生了许多下游影响,包括对一些妇女来说,改变了怀孕的愿望。本研究探讨了COVID-19大流行期间低收入人群产前护理开始时怀孕意愿和爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分的影响。方法:回顾性分析2019年5月至11月和2020年5月至11月在两家大型医疗补助诊所进行产前护理的妇女队列。在20周前接受产前护理并怀孕至足月的妇女也包括在内。对妊娠意向、人口统计学、病史和EPDS评分进行抽象化。采用多变量logistic回归分析,分析流行前和流行前的妊娠意向。采用非配对t检验比较大流行前和大流行前意外妊娠的EPDS评分。结果:大流行前队列中有462名女性,COVID大流行队列中有477名女性。在大流行期间,53.04%(253/477)的妇女报告了计划外怀孕,在控制所有其他因素时,与大流行前42.86%(198/462)的怀孕基线相比显著增加(P < 0.01,优势比1.62,95%置信区间1.19-2.20)。对意外怀孕的分析特别表明,大流行前和大流行前的人口构成没有显著差异。在两个队列中,意外怀孕的EPDS评分也没有显著变化。结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,在大量医疗补助患者人群中,计划外妊娠的数量显著增加,尽管计划外妊娠的人口统计数据和平均EPDS评分没有显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信