Qualitative Exploration of Contraceptive Knowledge in Men and Women.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Olivia Moumne, Lori M Gawron, Kathryn E Storck, Jessica N Sanders, David K Turok, Misha Pangasa
{"title":"Qualitative Exploration of Contraceptive Knowledge in Men and Women.","authors":"Olivia Moumne, Lori M Gawron, Kathryn E Storck, Jessica N Sanders, David K Turok, Misha Pangasa","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The level of knowledge about contraceptives overall is low in the United States. This qualitative study adds to the literature that explores gendered differences in contraceptive knowledge. Specifically, we examined knowledge regarding different contraceptive methods, directions on use, mechanism of action, efficacy, and adverse effects. We also looked at men's perspectives on their partner's knowledge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were interviewed at a Planned Parenthood Association of Utah clinic. They were asked about contraception knowledge, attitudes, and male involvement in contraceptive decision making. In this secondary analysis, we reanalyzed codes that were previously identified under primary analysis for specific content about contraceptive knowledge and differences by sex.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an overall low level of knowledge about contraceptives, particularly in men as compared with women. Men often overestimate their female partners' knowledge. Men were more likely to understand how to use methods that require their direct participation. Although women's contraceptive knowledge was better than that of the male participants, it was still poor overall.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low level of knowledge about contraceptives is associated with increased rates of unintended pregnancy. This study demonstrates a need for improved education about contraception. Given the impact of male opinion in contraceptive use, efforts to increase their knowledge could be important interventions to increase contraceptive uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":"117 12","pages":"681-685"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001762","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The level of knowledge about contraceptives overall is low in the United States. This qualitative study adds to the literature that explores gendered differences in contraceptive knowledge. Specifically, we examined knowledge regarding different contraceptive methods, directions on use, mechanism of action, efficacy, and adverse effects. We also looked at men's perspectives on their partner's knowledge.

Methods: Participants were interviewed at a Planned Parenthood Association of Utah clinic. They were asked about contraception knowledge, attitudes, and male involvement in contraceptive decision making. In this secondary analysis, we reanalyzed codes that were previously identified under primary analysis for specific content about contraceptive knowledge and differences by sex.

Results: We found an overall low level of knowledge about contraceptives, particularly in men as compared with women. Men often overestimate their female partners' knowledge. Men were more likely to understand how to use methods that require their direct participation. Although women's contraceptive knowledge was better than that of the male participants, it was still poor overall.

Conclusions: A low level of knowledge about contraceptives is associated with increased rates of unintended pregnancy. This study demonstrates a need for improved education about contraception. Given the impact of male opinion in contraceptive use, efforts to increase their knowledge could be important interventions to increase contraceptive uptake.

男性和女性避孕知识的质性探索。
目的:在美国,避孕知识的总体水平很低。这一定性研究增加了探讨避孕知识的性别差异的文献。具体地说,我们检查了关于不同避孕方法的知识,使用方向,作用机制,疗效和不良反应。我们还研究了男性对其伴侣知识的看法。方法:在犹他州计划生育协会诊所对参与者进行访谈。她们被问及避孕知识、态度以及男性参与避孕决策的情况。在这个二次分析中,我们重新分析了以前在初次分析中确定的关于避孕知识的具体内容和性别差异的代码。结果:我们发现,与女性相比,男性的避孕知识水平总体较低。男人经常高估他们的女性伴侣的知识。男性更有可能理解如何使用需要他们直接参与的方法。虽然女性的避孕知识比男性参与者好,但总体上仍然很差。结论:避孕知识水平低与意外妊娠率升高有关。这项研究表明需要加强避孕教育。鉴于男性意见对避孕药具使用的影响,努力增加他们的知识可能是增加避孕药具吸收的重要干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信