Laura Pala, Tommaso De Pas, Emilia Cocorocchio, Chiara Catania, Giovanni Ceresoli, Daniele Laszlo, Emma Zattarin, Giovanna Rossi, Fabio Conforti
{"title":"Gender-Based Differences in the Efficacy of Anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy in Patients with BRAF-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.","authors":"Laura Pala, Tommaso De Pas, Emilia Cocorocchio, Chiara Catania, Giovanni Ceresoli, Daniele Laszlo, Emma Zattarin, Giovanna Rossi, Fabio Conforti","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We previously showed that men with melanoma harboring BRAF mutations had significantly lower benefit from targeted therapy as compared with women Here we explored the hypothesis that such gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of BRAF-pathway blockade extends to other tumor histotypes carrying pathogenic BRAF-mutations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of patients with advanced colorectal-cancer (CRC) harboring BRAF V600E mutations, treated with anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. The primary objective was to assess the association between gender and outcome of patients treated with targeted therapy, in terms of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between gender and PFS and OS, adjusted for other relevant clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, including ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2), primary tumor site (right-side vs left-side), microsatellite instability status (instable [MSI] vs stable [MSS]), number of metastatic sites at treatment start, treatment type (double targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF] vs triple targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF + anti-MEK]) and mutational status of the RNF43 gene (wild type vs mutated).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-eight patients with advanced CRC were included in the analysis: 59 (60%) were women and 39 (40%) men. The ORR was 43.1% in women vs only 23.7% in men (p-value = .05). Multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant clinical, pathological, and molecular variables associated with patients' prognosis, showed a significantly shorter PFS and OS in men as compared with women: the adjusted-HR was, respectively, 1.65 (95%CI,1.00-2.69; p = .04) for PFS and 1.83 (95%CI,1.08-3.08; p-value = .02) for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We confirmed a significant gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK therapy in patients with advanced-CRC harboring BRAF mutations that warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2024.10.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: We previously showed that men with melanoma harboring BRAF mutations had significantly lower benefit from targeted therapy as compared with women Here we explored the hypothesis that such gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of BRAF-pathway blockade extends to other tumor histotypes carrying pathogenic BRAF-mutations.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from a cohort of patients with advanced colorectal-cancer (CRC) harboring BRAF V600E mutations, treated with anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK targeted therapy. The primary objective was to assess the association between gender and outcome of patients treated with targeted therapy, in terms of overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the association between gender and PFS and OS, adjusted for other relevant clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors, including ECOG PS (0 vs 1-2), primary tumor site (right-side vs left-side), microsatellite instability status (instable [MSI] vs stable [MSS]), number of metastatic sites at treatment start, treatment type (double targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF] vs triple targeted therapy [ie, anti-EGFR + anti-BRAF + anti-MEK]) and mutational status of the RNF43 gene (wild type vs mutated).
Results: Ninety-eight patients with advanced CRC were included in the analysis: 59 (60%) were women and 39 (40%) men. The ORR was 43.1% in women vs only 23.7% in men (p-value = .05). Multivariable analysis adjusted for relevant clinical, pathological, and molecular variables associated with patients' prognosis, showed a significantly shorter PFS and OS in men as compared with women: the adjusted-HR was, respectively, 1.65 (95%CI,1.00-2.69; p = .04) for PFS and 1.83 (95%CI,1.08-3.08; p-value = .02) for OS.
Conclusions: We confirmed a significant gender-based dimorphism in the efficacy of anti-EGFR/BRAF/MEK therapy in patients with advanced-CRC harboring BRAF mutations that warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.