Relationship between 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability and Degree of Renal Artery Stenosis in Hospitalized Patients with Hypertension.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-08 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.31083/j.rcm2511397
Xiaoyang Luo, Wei Liu, Xi Peng, Pengqiang Li
{"title":"Relationship between 24-h Ambulatory Blood Pressure Variability and Degree of Renal Artery Stenosis in Hospitalized Patients with Hypertension.","authors":"Xiaoyang Luo, Wei Liu, Xi Peng, Pengqiang Li","doi":"10.31083/j.rcm2511397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a critical risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and is associated with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), which is diagnosed using digital subtraction angiography (DSA). However, the relationship between the degree of renal artery stenosis (d-RAS), diagnosed using renal artery contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and 24-hour ambulatory BPV in hospitalized patients with ARAS remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hospitalized hypertensive patients were divided into ARAS and non-ARAS groups based RAS diagnoses using CEUS. The ARAS patients were further classified into unilateral and bilateral categories. Quantification of BPV over 24 hours, daytime, and nighttime utilized standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV). Percentage stenosis was used to evaluate d-RAS. Pearson's and multivariate beta regression analyses were used to assess correlations between BPV and d-RAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 24-hour systolic BPV (SBPV), presented as SD, CV, and ARV indices, was positively correlated with unilateral d-RAS (R<sup>1</sup> = 0.460, <i>p</i> = 0.001; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.509, <i>p</i> < 0.001; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.677, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively). This correlation was consistent with the daytime SBPV (R<sup>1</sup> = 0.512, <i>p</i> < 0.001; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.539, <i>p</i> < 0.001; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.678, <i>p</i> < 0.001, respectively) and daytime diastolic BPV (DBPV) (R<sup>1</sup> = 0.379, <i>p</i> = 0.010; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.397, <i>p</i> = 0.007; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.319, <i>p</i> = 0.033, respectively). Similarly, 24-hour DBPV assessed by SD and CV also correlated positively with unilateral d-RAS (R<sup>1</sup> = 0.347, <i>p</i> = 0.019; R<sup>1</sup> = 0.340, <i>p</i> = 0.022, respectively), as did nighttime SBPV assessed by ARV indices (R<sup>1</sup> = 0.415, <i>p</i> = 0.005). No significant correlations were found between BPV and bilateral d-RAS (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Multivariate beta regression analysis indicated that 24-hour SBPV (odds ratio [OR] = 1.035, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054-1.607, <i>p</i> = 0.035) and daytime SBPV (OR = 1.033, 95% CI: 1.004-1.061, <i>p</i> = 0.023; both evaluated via AVR) were independent risk factors for d-RAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBPV is positively correlated with unilateral d-RAS at all time points. Both 24-hour and daytime SBPV (evaluated using ARV indices) were identified as independent d-RAS risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"25 11","pages":"397"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2511397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a critical risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes and is associated with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS), which is diagnosed using digital subtraction angiography (DSA). However, the relationship between the degree of renal artery stenosis (d-RAS), diagnosed using renal artery contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and 24-hour ambulatory BPV in hospitalized patients with ARAS remains unclear.

Methods: Hospitalized hypertensive patients were divided into ARAS and non-ARAS groups based RAS diagnoses using CEUS. The ARAS patients were further classified into unilateral and bilateral categories. Quantification of BPV over 24 hours, daytime, and nighttime utilized standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), and average real variability (ARV). Percentage stenosis was used to evaluate d-RAS. Pearson's and multivariate beta regression analyses were used to assess correlations between BPV and d-RAS.

Results: We found that 24-hour systolic BPV (SBPV), presented as SD, CV, and ARV indices, was positively correlated with unilateral d-RAS (R1 = 0.460, p = 0.001; R1 = 0.509, p < 0.001; R1 = 0.677, p < 0.001, respectively). This correlation was consistent with the daytime SBPV (R1 = 0.512, p < 0.001; R1 = 0.539, p < 0.001; R1 = 0.678, p < 0.001, respectively) and daytime diastolic BPV (DBPV) (R1 = 0.379, p = 0.010; R1 = 0.397, p = 0.007; R1 = 0.319, p = 0.033, respectively). Similarly, 24-hour DBPV assessed by SD and CV also correlated positively with unilateral d-RAS (R1 = 0.347, p = 0.019; R1 = 0.340, p = 0.022, respectively), as did nighttime SBPV assessed by ARV indices (R1 = 0.415, p = 0.005). No significant correlations were found between BPV and bilateral d-RAS (p > 0.05). Multivariate beta regression analysis indicated that 24-hour SBPV (odds ratio [OR] = 1.035, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.054-1.607, p = 0.035) and daytime SBPV (OR = 1.033, 95% CI: 1.004-1.061, p = 0.023; both evaluated via AVR) were independent risk factors for d-RAS.

Conclusions: SBPV is positively correlated with unilateral d-RAS at all time points. Both 24-hour and daytime SBPV (evaluated using ARV indices) were identified as independent d-RAS risk factors.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信