Factors Associated With Emergency Medical Clinicians Leaving EMS.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Christopher B Gage, Christine B Cooke, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Jordan D Kurth, Shea van den Bergh, Ashish R Panchal
{"title":"Factors Associated With Emergency Medical Clinicians Leaving EMS.","authors":"Christopher B Gage, Christine B Cooke, Jonathan R Powell, Jacob C Kamholz, Jordan D Kurth, Shea van den Bergh, Ashish R Panchal","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2436047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Many United States (U.S.) communities face challenges with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workforce turnover. The demands created by the pandemic have worsened the stressors EMS clinicians face, possibly changing the drivers of workforce turnover. Our study aims to understand the factors associated with Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics' likelihood of leaving EMS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally registered civilian EMTs and paramedics ages 18-85 from October 2021 to April 2022. After recertifying their National EMS certification, respondents were invited to complete a survey regarding their primary role, additional jobs, and the likelihood of leaving EMS in the next 12 months. If likely to leave, reasons for leaving were collected and evaluated for the top reasons. Multivariable logistic regression modeling (OR, 95% CI) was used to describe the odds of being likely to leave in 12 months, adjusted for age, agency type, education level, primary role, and job satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29,671 (response rate-25.9%) EMTs and paramedics were included in the analysis, with 7.1% and 7.9%, respectively, reporting they were likely to leave EMS in 12 months. The EMTs likely to leave were younger (median age 32 vs. 37) and had fewer years with main EMS job (median 3 vs. 4) than paramedics. A lower proportion of EMTs were male (68.8% vs. 78.6%) and non-Hispanic White (79.8% vs. 87.6%). The EMTs were less likely full-time (65.6% vs. 87.5%) and held fewer EMS jobs (23.4% vs. 32.3%). The EMTs and paramedics reported stress as the most significant reason for leaving (27.9% and 38.8%, respectively), followed by COVID-19 (12.9% and 19.3%) and education (18.3% and 6.4%). Those dissatisfied had significantly higher odds of leaving (11.91 and 13.46, respectively). The EMTs and paramedics in hospitals (OR = 2.32, OR = 2.37), private (OR = 2.72, OR = 2.38), and government non-fire (OR = 2.22, OR = 1.98) agencies were likelier to leave than fire agencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although increased stress and pandemic-related factors are most common reasons reported for being likely to leave EMS, job dissatisfaction was the most impactful factor. A better understanding of factors that drive job satisfaction needs evaluation to develop strategies to enhance retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2436047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Many United States (U.S.) communities face challenges with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) workforce turnover. The demands created by the pandemic have worsened the stressors EMS clinicians face, possibly changing the drivers of workforce turnover. Our study aims to understand the factors associated with Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and paramedics' likelihood of leaving EMS.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally registered civilian EMTs and paramedics ages 18-85 from October 2021 to April 2022. After recertifying their National EMS certification, respondents were invited to complete a survey regarding their primary role, additional jobs, and the likelihood of leaving EMS in the next 12 months. If likely to leave, reasons for leaving were collected and evaluated for the top reasons. Multivariable logistic regression modeling (OR, 95% CI) was used to describe the odds of being likely to leave in 12 months, adjusted for age, agency type, education level, primary role, and job satisfaction.

Results: A total of 29,671 (response rate-25.9%) EMTs and paramedics were included in the analysis, with 7.1% and 7.9%, respectively, reporting they were likely to leave EMS in 12 months. The EMTs likely to leave were younger (median age 32 vs. 37) and had fewer years with main EMS job (median 3 vs. 4) than paramedics. A lower proportion of EMTs were male (68.8% vs. 78.6%) and non-Hispanic White (79.8% vs. 87.6%). The EMTs were less likely full-time (65.6% vs. 87.5%) and held fewer EMS jobs (23.4% vs. 32.3%). The EMTs and paramedics reported stress as the most significant reason for leaving (27.9% and 38.8%, respectively), followed by COVID-19 (12.9% and 19.3%) and education (18.3% and 6.4%). Those dissatisfied had significantly higher odds of leaving (11.91 and 13.46, respectively). The EMTs and paramedics in hospitals (OR = 2.32, OR = 2.37), private (OR = 2.72, OR = 2.38), and government non-fire (OR = 2.22, OR = 1.98) agencies were likelier to leave than fire agencies.

Conclusion: Although increased stress and pandemic-related factors are most common reasons reported for being likely to leave EMS, job dissatisfaction was the most impactful factor. A better understanding of factors that drive job satisfaction needs evaluation to develop strategies to enhance retention.

急诊医师离开EMS的相关因素
目标:许多美国社区面临着紧急医疗服务(EMS)人员流动的挑战。大流行造成的需求加剧了EMS临床医生面临的压力,可能会改变员工流动的驱动因素。本研究旨在了解影响急诊医疗技术人员(EMTs)及护理人员离职可能性的相关因素。方法:我们对2021年10月至2022年4月期间18-85岁的全国注册民用急诊医师和护理人员进行了横断面分析。在重新获得国家EMS认证后,受访者被邀请完成一份关于他们的主要角色、额外工作以及在未来12个月内离开EMS的可能性的调查。如果有可能离职,则收集离职原因,并根据最主要的原因进行评估。使用多变量logistic回归模型(OR, 95% CI)来描述可能在12个月内离职的几率,并根据年龄、代理类型、教育水平、主要角色和工作满意度进行调整。结果:共有29,671名emt和护理人员(有效率为25.9%)被纳入分析,分别有7.1%和7.9%的人报告他们可能在12个月内离开EMS。与护理人员相比,可能离职的急救医生更年轻(中位年龄32岁对37岁),从事主要急救工作的时间更短(中位年龄3岁对4岁)。男性(68.8%比78.6%)和非西班牙裔白人(79.8%比87.6%)的emt比例较低。emt不太可能是全职的(65.6%对87.5%),从事的EMS工作也较少(23.4%对32.3%)。emt和护理人员报告压力是离职的最重要原因(分别为27.9%和38.8%),其次是COVID-19(12.9%和19.3%)和教育(18.3%和6.4%)。那些不满意的人离职的几率明显更高(分别为11.91和13.46)。医院(OR = 2.32, OR = 2.37)、私人(OR = 2.72, OR = 2.38)和政府非消防机构(OR = 2.22, OR = 1.98)的emt和护理人员比消防机构更容易离职。结论:虽然压力增加和流行病相关因素是最常见的可能离开EMS的原因,但工作不满是最重要的影响因素。为了更好地了解驱动工作满意度的因素,需要进行评估,以制定提高员工留存率的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信