Sofia C Zambrano, Martina Egloff, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Simon Allan, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, John Ellershaw, Claudia Fischer, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Urška Lunder, Marisa Martin-Rosello, Stephen Mason, Birgit Rasmussen, Valgerdur Sigurðardóttir, Judt Simon, Vilma A Tripodoro, Agnes van der Heide, Lia van Zuylen, Raymond Voltz, Carl Johan Fürst, Paula R Williamson, Steffen Eychmüller
{"title":"A core outcome set for best care for the dying person: Results of an international Delphi study and consensus meeting.","authors":"Sofia C Zambrano, Martina Egloff, Valentina Gonzalez-Jaramillo, Andri Christen-Cevallos Rosero, Simon Allan, Pilar Barnestein-Fonseca, John Ellershaw, Claudia Fischer, Dagny Faksvåg Haugen, Urška Lunder, Marisa Martin-Rosello, Stephen Mason, Birgit Rasmussen, Valgerdur Sigurðardóttir, Judt Simon, Vilma A Tripodoro, Agnes van der Heide, Lia van Zuylen, Raymond Voltz, Carl Johan Fürst, Paula R Williamson, Steffen Eychmüller","doi":"10.1177/02692163241300867","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Outcome measurement is essential to progress clinical practice and improve patient care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop a Core Outcome Set for best care for the dying person.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We followed the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative guidelines, which involved identifying potential outcomes via a systematic literature review (n = 619 papers) and from participants in the \"iLIVE\" project (10 countries: 101 patients, 37 family members, 63 clinicians), followed by a two-round Delphi study, and a consensus meeting.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Clinicians, researchers, family members, and patient representatives from 20 countries participated in the Delphi Rounds 1 (n = 462) and 2 (n = 355). Thirty-two participants attended the consensus meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the systematic review and the cohort study we identified 256 and 238 outcomes respectively, from which we extracted a 52-outcome list covering areas related to the patients' physical, psychosocial, and spiritual dimensions, family support, place of care and care delivery, relational aspects of care, and general concepts. A preliminary 13-outcome list reached consensus during the Delphi. At the consensus meeting, a 14-item Core Outcome Set was ratified by the participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study involved a large and diverse sample of key stakeholders in defining the core outcome set for best care for the dying person, focusing on the last days of life. By actively integrating the perspectives of family carers and patient representatives from various cultural backgrounds this Core Outcome Set enriches our understanding of essential elements of care for the dying and provides a solid foundation for advancing quality of end-of-life care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"163-175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11673312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163241300867","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Outcome measurement is essential to progress clinical practice and improve patient care.
Aim: To develop a Core Outcome Set for best care for the dying person.
Design: We followed the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) Initiative guidelines, which involved identifying potential outcomes via a systematic literature review (n = 619 papers) and from participants in the "iLIVE" project (10 countries: 101 patients, 37 family members, 63 clinicians), followed by a two-round Delphi study, and a consensus meeting.
Setting/participants: Clinicians, researchers, family members, and patient representatives from 20 countries participated in the Delphi Rounds 1 (n = 462) and 2 (n = 355). Thirty-two participants attended the consensus meeting.
Results: From the systematic review and the cohort study we identified 256 and 238 outcomes respectively, from which we extracted a 52-outcome list covering areas related to the patients' physical, psychosocial, and spiritual dimensions, family support, place of care and care delivery, relational aspects of care, and general concepts. A preliminary 13-outcome list reached consensus during the Delphi. At the consensus meeting, a 14-item Core Outcome Set was ratified by the participants.
Conclusions: This study involved a large and diverse sample of key stakeholders in defining the core outcome set for best care for the dying person, focusing on the last days of life. By actively integrating the perspectives of family carers and patient representatives from various cultural backgrounds this Core Outcome Set enriches our understanding of essential elements of care for the dying and provides a solid foundation for advancing quality of end-of-life care.
期刊介绍:
Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).