Nuclear Medicine Cerebral Perfusion Studies as an Ancillary Test to Support Evaluation of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Infants, 2005-2022.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003596
Ashley M Bach, Nicole K McKinnon, Hongming Zhuang, Elizabeth Kaufman, Matthew P Kirschen
{"title":"Nuclear Medicine Cerebral Perfusion Studies as an Ancillary Test to Support Evaluation of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: Single-Center Experience in Infants, 2005-2022.","authors":"Ashley M Bach, Nicole K McKinnon, Hongming Zhuang, Elizabeth Kaufman, Matthew P Kirschen","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the use of nuclear medicine cerebral perfusion studies as an ancillary test for brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) in infants aged under 1 year.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single-center, quaternary, academic children's hospital in the United States.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients younger than 1 year of age whose evaluation for BD/DNC included a nuclear medicine cerebral perfusion study as an ancillary test, 2005-2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Ten infants were identified from local databases. Mechanisms of brain injury included hypoxic-ischemic injury (8/10), traumatic brain injury (1/10), and intracranial hemorrhage (1/10). Testable components of the first BD/DNC examination were consistent with BD/DNC in all patients. Apnea testing was consistent with BD/DNC in 5 of 10 patients and deferred or terminated prematurely in 5 of 10 patients. All patients underwent ancillary testing with a nuclear medicine scan to assess cerebral perfusion using 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (99mTc-ECD). Indications were inability to complete the apnea test (5/10), presence of a confounder to the clinical examination (3/10), and clinician discretion (2/10). Nine studies were consistent with BD/DNC. The patient whose ancillary test was inconsistent with BD/DNC had their examination limited by the inability to assess the pupillary reflex and subsequently underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Radionuclide cerebral perfusion studies using 99mTc-ECD were used in our setting to support the determination of BD/DNC in infants aged younger than 1 year of age.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"25 12","pages":"1089-1095"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003596","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe the use of nuclear medicine cerebral perfusion studies as an ancillary test for brain death/death by neurologic criteria (BD/DNC) in infants aged under 1 year.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Setting: Single-center, quaternary, academic children's hospital in the United States.

Patients: Patients younger than 1 year of age whose evaluation for BD/DNC included a nuclear medicine cerebral perfusion study as an ancillary test, 2005-2022.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Ten infants were identified from local databases. Mechanisms of brain injury included hypoxic-ischemic injury (8/10), traumatic brain injury (1/10), and intracranial hemorrhage (1/10). Testable components of the first BD/DNC examination were consistent with BD/DNC in all patients. Apnea testing was consistent with BD/DNC in 5 of 10 patients and deferred or terminated prematurely in 5 of 10 patients. All patients underwent ancillary testing with a nuclear medicine scan to assess cerebral perfusion using 99mTc-ethyl cysteinate dimer (99mTc-ECD). Indications were inability to complete the apnea test (5/10), presence of a confounder to the clinical examination (3/10), and clinician discretion (2/10). Nine studies were consistent with BD/DNC. The patient whose ancillary test was inconsistent with BD/DNC had their examination limited by the inability to assess the pupillary reflex and subsequently underwent withdrawal of life-sustaining technology.

Conclusions: Radionuclide cerebral perfusion studies using 99mTc-ECD were used in our setting to support the determination of BD/DNC in infants aged younger than 1 year of age.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信