Caregiver Perspectives on Provider Continuity During Prolonged PICU Hospitalizations: A Single-Center Qualitative Study, 2021-2022.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626
Patricia Peña Jiménez, Wendy Leatherman Phipps, Elizabeth Jacob-Files, Elizabeth Lindo, Lauren C Rakes, Joan S Roberts, Jonna D Clark, Emily R Berkman, Katie R Nielsen
{"title":"Caregiver Perspectives on Provider Continuity During Prolonged PICU Hospitalizations: A Single-Center Qualitative Study, 2021-2022.","authors":"Patricia Peña Jiménez, Wendy Leatherman Phipps, Elizabeth Jacob-Files, Elizabeth Lindo, Lauren C Rakes, Joan S Roberts, Jonna D Clark, Emily R Berkman, Katie R Nielsen","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To improve continuity of care, some PICUs assign a continuity attending (CA) physician for children with prolonged hospitalizations. Little is known about how this intervention impacts familial caregivers' experiences. The objective of this study was to provide in-depth descriptions of family perspectives about continuity of care during prolonged PICU hospitalizations for children with and without a PICU CA.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative semi-structured interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single center cohort, from October 2021 to December 2022, at an academic PICU in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Familial caregivers (n = 39) of critically ill children hospitalized in the PICU for greater than or equal to 14 days were purposively sampled, stratified by group: 18 with a PICU CA and 21 without a PICU CA.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in the context of the continuity of care model using a realist thematic approach. Familial caregivers described six themes related to relational, informational, and management continuity: 1) familiar providers who demonstrate empathy for the child improve family members' comfort and trust (Relational); 2) providers who know and use a child's baseline health status to inform clinical decision-making alleviate family members' stress (Relational, Management); 3) information loss during care team transitions frustrates families (Informational, Management); 4) known providers enhance caregiver communication (Informational); 5) familiar providers who value a family's expertise about their child's care (Relational, Management); and 6) take responsibility for the child's long-term care plan (Management) decrease parental stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>As PICU patient medical complexity and length of stay increase, familial caregivers' needs transition from understanding day-to-day management to navigating care team transitions and partnering with providers to develop long-term care plans. Targeted interventions to increase provider continuity that consider relational, informational, and management continuity are needed to optimize patient outcomes and family experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":"25 12","pages":"1159-1167"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To improve continuity of care, some PICUs assign a continuity attending (CA) physician for children with prolonged hospitalizations. Little is known about how this intervention impacts familial caregivers' experiences. The objective of this study was to provide in-depth descriptions of family perspectives about continuity of care during prolonged PICU hospitalizations for children with and without a PICU CA.

Design: Qualitative semi-structured interviews.

Setting: Single center cohort, from October 2021 to December 2022, at an academic PICU in the United States.

Participants: Familial caregivers (n = 39) of critically ill children hospitalized in the PICU for greater than or equal to 14 days were purposively sampled, stratified by group: 18 with a PICU CA and 21 without a PICU CA.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Semi-structured interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, coded, and analyzed in the context of the continuity of care model using a realist thematic approach. Familial caregivers described six themes related to relational, informational, and management continuity: 1) familiar providers who demonstrate empathy for the child improve family members' comfort and trust (Relational); 2) providers who know and use a child's baseline health status to inform clinical decision-making alleviate family members' stress (Relational, Management); 3) information loss during care team transitions frustrates families (Informational, Management); 4) known providers enhance caregiver communication (Informational); 5) familiar providers who value a family's expertise about their child's care (Relational, Management); and 6) take responsibility for the child's long-term care plan (Management) decrease parental stress.

Conclusions: As PICU patient medical complexity and length of stay increase, familial caregivers' needs transition from understanding day-to-day management to navigating care team transitions and partnering with providers to develop long-term care plans. Targeted interventions to increase provider continuity that consider relational, informational, and management continuity are needed to optimize patient outcomes and family experiences.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信