Effect of optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy with sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) and dapaglifloziN on left Ventricular reverse remodelling as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) Imaging: the ENVI study.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alice Zheng, Robert Adam, Charles Peebles, Stephen Harden, James Shambrook, Ausami Abbas, Katharine Vedwan, Georgina Adam, Paul Haydock, Peter Cowburn, Christopher Young, Jane Long, Michelle Walkden, Simon Smith, Elizabeth Greenwood, Paula Olden, Andrew Flett
{"title":"Effect of optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy with sacubitril/valsartan (Entresto) and dapaglifloziN on left Ventricular reverse remodelling as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) Imaging: the ENVI study.","authors":"Alice Zheng, Robert Adam, Charles Peebles, Stephen Harden, James Shambrook, Ausami Abbas, Katharine Vedwan, Georgina Adam, Paul Haydock, Peter Cowburn, Christopher Young, Jane Long, Michelle Walkden, Simon Smith, Elizabeth Greenwood, Paula Olden, Andrew Flett","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) guidelines recommend 'four pillars' of medical therapy and device therapy if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains ≤35% after 3 months optimum medical therapy.We conducted the first study to examine the effects of optimisation to contemporary medical therapy on cardiac reverse remodelling, as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).We hypothesised a proportion of patients would undergo beneficial remodelling and LVEF improvement above the threshold for complex device prescription after 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HFrEF patients with symptomatic LVEF≤35% despite ACE inhibitor/beta blocker/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy, and qualified for sacubitril/valsartan switchover were recruited to this single centre prospective study.CMR was performed at baseline and at follow-up. Clinical, volumetric and outcome data were collected and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2021 and August 2022, 49 patients were recruited. The majority (80%) were male, mean age 63±14 years. 35 (71%) had non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. 2 (4%) patients died and 47 were followed up for a median of 7.4 months. There were no heart failure hospitalisations.Significant reductions were seen in median indexed left atrial volume: 54 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (41-72) to 39 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (30-60) (p<0.001); indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume: 109 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (74-125) to 76 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (58-102) (p<0.001); indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume: 74mL/m<sup>2</sup> (50-92) to 43 mL/m<sup>2</sup> (27-58) (p<0.001) and mean indexed left ventricular mass: 72±13 g/m<sup>2</sup> to 62±13 g/m<sup>2</sup> (p<0.001).Median LVEF increased by 12 points from 31% to 43% (p<0.001). 29 (59%) patients improved to LVEF>35%. 13 (27%) patients improved to LVEF≥50%.Median N-terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) reduced from 883 ng/L (293-2043) to 429 ng/L (171-1421) (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy results in beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and significant improvements in LVEF and NTproBNP at 6 months as demonstrated by CMR. 59% of our cohort no longer met complex device indications. Guidelines suggest re-assessment of LVEF at 3 months, but our data suggests a longer period is required.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05348226.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"11 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) guidelines recommend 'four pillars' of medical therapy and device therapy if left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains ≤35% after 3 months optimum medical therapy.We conducted the first study to examine the effects of optimisation to contemporary medical therapy on cardiac reverse remodelling, as demonstrated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).We hypothesised a proportion of patients would undergo beneficial remodelling and LVEF improvement above the threshold for complex device prescription after 6 months.

Methods: HFrEF patients with symptomatic LVEF≤35% despite ACE inhibitor/beta blocker/mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy, and qualified for sacubitril/valsartan switchover were recruited to this single centre prospective study.CMR was performed at baseline and at follow-up. Clinical, volumetric and outcome data were collected and compared.

Results: Between June 2021 and August 2022, 49 patients were recruited. The majority (80%) were male, mean age 63±14 years. 35 (71%) had non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy. 2 (4%) patients died and 47 were followed up for a median of 7.4 months. There were no heart failure hospitalisations.Significant reductions were seen in median indexed left atrial volume: 54 mL/m2 (41-72) to 39 mL/m2 (30-60) (p<0.001); indexed left ventricular end-diastolic volume: 109 mL/m2 (74-125) to 76 mL/m2 (58-102) (p<0.001); indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume: 74mL/m2 (50-92) to 43 mL/m2 (27-58) (p<0.001) and mean indexed left ventricular mass: 72±13 g/m2 to 62±13 g/m2 (p<0.001).Median LVEF increased by 12 points from 31% to 43% (p<0.001). 29 (59%) patients improved to LVEF>35%. 13 (27%) patients improved to LVEF≥50%.Median N-terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP) reduced from 883 ng/L (293-2043) to 429 ng/L (171-1421) (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Optimisation to contemporary HFrEF medical therapy results in beneficial cardiac reverse remodelling and significant improvements in LVEF and NTproBNP at 6 months as demonstrated by CMR. 59% of our cohort no longer met complex device indications. Guidelines suggest re-assessment of LVEF at 3 months, but our data suggests a longer period is required.

Trial registration number: NCT05348226.

心脏磁共振(CMR)成像显示的苏比里尔/缬沙坦(enterresto)和达格列净对左心室反向重构的优化当代HFrEF药物治疗的影响:ENVI研究。
导论:如果左心室射血分数(LVEF)在最佳药物治疗3个月后仍≤35%,心力衰竭并射血分数降低(HFrEF)指南推荐药物治疗和器械治疗的“四大支柱”。我们通过心脏磁共振成像(CMR)进行了首次研究,以检查优化当代医学治疗对心脏反向重构的影响。我们假设一定比例的患者在6个月后将进行有益的重塑和LVEF改善,高于复杂装置处方的阈值。方法:招募经ACE抑制剂/受体阻滞剂/矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂治疗后仍有症状的LVEF≤35%的HFrEF患者,并符合sacubitril/缬沙坦切换的条件。CMR分别在基线和随访时进行。收集临床、体积和结局数据并进行比较。结果:在2021年6月至2022年8月期间,招募了49名患者。男性占多数(80%),平均年龄63±14岁。35例(71%)有非缺血性心肌病。2例(4%)患者死亡,47例患者随访,中位时间7.4个月。没有心力衰竭住院。中位指标左房容积显著降低:54 mL/m2(41-72)至39 mL/m2 (30-60) (p2(74-125)至76 mL/m2 (58-102) (p2(50-92)至43 mL/m2 (27-58)) (p2至62±13 g/m2 (p35%))。13例(27%)患者LVEF改善至≥50%。中位n端前B型利钠肽(NTproBNP)从883 ng/L(293-2043)降至429 ng/L(171-1421)。结论:CMR显示,优化当代HFrEF药物治疗可导致有益的心脏反向重构,6个月时LVEF和NTproBNP显著改善。59%的患者不再符合复杂的器械适应症。指南建议在3个月时重新评估LVEF,但我们的数据表明需要更长的时间。试验注册号:NCT05348226。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信