Centralized monitored anesthesia care by nurse anesthetist for cataract and glaucoma surgery in a 1:3 ratio: a non-inferiority study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Simon Clariot, Jean-Marie Moures, Lucia Lopes, Damien Gatinel, Eric Gabison, Georges Nicolaos, Laurence Salomon, Jean-Michel Devys
{"title":"Centralized monitored anesthesia care by nurse anesthetist for cataract and glaucoma surgery in a 1:3 ratio: a non-inferiority study.","authors":"Simon Clariot, Jean-Marie Moures, Lucia Lopes, Damien Gatinel, Eric Gabison, Georges Nicolaos, Laurence Salomon, Jean-Michel Devys","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18455-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minor Ophthalmic Procedures (MOP), especially cataract or glaucoma surgery, are considered low risk. However, in France, anesthesia must be monitored continuously and carried out by an anesthetist or a nurse anesthetist (NA). The aim was to assess whether an externalized monitored anesthesia care (MAC) would be non-inferior to an individual MAC inside the OR regarding the incidence of severe hypertension, bradycardia, hypoxemia, and surgeon satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a monocentric randomized, non-inferiority trial. Adults undergoing MOP with topical or locoregional anesthesia were randomly assigned to externalized MAC (the NA monitored simultaneously up to 3 patients with a screen monitor repeating the inside monitor) or inside MAC. The primary endpoint was a composite of per-operative complications defined as a blood pressure >200 mmHg, pulse rate <45/min, pulse oximetry <85%, or surgeon satisfaction regarding patient security <3/10. Secondary endpoints included patient and surgeons' overall satisfaction, re-operation within 24 hours, and nurses' overall satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 900 patients were enrolled (450 in both groups). The externalized MAC was non-inferior to inside MAC as event occurred in 29 patients (6.4%) and 26 patients (5.8%), respectively (adjusted difference - 0.7%). Patient agitation assessed by the surgeon was lower with the inside MAC (adjusted mean difference -0.33; 95%CI -0.61 to -0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients undergoing MOP with topical or locoregional anesthesia, an externalized MAC strategy with a 1:3 NA-to-patient ratio were non-inferior to an inside monitoring on the incidence of severe hypertension, bradycardia, hypoxemia and surgeon satisfaction regarding patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18455-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minor Ophthalmic Procedures (MOP), especially cataract or glaucoma surgery, are considered low risk. However, in France, anesthesia must be monitored continuously and carried out by an anesthetist or a nurse anesthetist (NA). The aim was to assess whether an externalized monitored anesthesia care (MAC) would be non-inferior to an individual MAC inside the OR regarding the incidence of severe hypertension, bradycardia, hypoxemia, and surgeon satisfaction.

Methods: We performed a monocentric randomized, non-inferiority trial. Adults undergoing MOP with topical or locoregional anesthesia were randomly assigned to externalized MAC (the NA monitored simultaneously up to 3 patients with a screen monitor repeating the inside monitor) or inside MAC. The primary endpoint was a composite of per-operative complications defined as a blood pressure >200 mmHg, pulse rate <45/min, pulse oximetry <85%, or surgeon satisfaction regarding patient security <3/10. Secondary endpoints included patient and surgeons' overall satisfaction, re-operation within 24 hours, and nurses' overall satisfaction.

Results: A total of 900 patients were enrolled (450 in both groups). The externalized MAC was non-inferior to inside MAC as event occurred in 29 patients (6.4%) and 26 patients (5.8%), respectively (adjusted difference - 0.7%). Patient agitation assessed by the surgeon was lower with the inside MAC (adjusted mean difference -0.33; 95%CI -0.61 to -0.04).

Conclusions: Among patients undergoing MOP with topical or locoregional anesthesia, an externalized MAC strategy with a 1:3 NA-to-patient ratio were non-inferior to an inside monitoring on the incidence of severe hypertension, bradycardia, hypoxemia and surgeon satisfaction regarding patient safety.

护理麻醉师以1:3的比例对白内障和青光眼手术进行集中监控麻醉护理:一项非劣效性研究。
背景:小眼科手术(MOP),特别是白内障或青光眼手术,被认为是低风险的。然而,在法国,麻醉必须由麻醉师或麻醉师护士(NA)持续监测和执行。目的是评估在严重高血压、心动过缓、低氧血症和外科医生满意度方面,外化监测麻醉护理(MAC)是否优于手术室内单独的MAC。方法:我们进行了一项单中心随机、非劣效性试验。接受局部麻醉或局部麻醉的MOP的成年人被随机分配到外部MAC(同时监测最多3名患者的NA,屏幕监视器重复内部监视器)或内部MAC。主要终点是手术并发症的综合定义为血压>200 mmHg,脉搏率结果:共入组900例患者(两组各450例)。外化MAC不逊于内化MAC,分别发生29例(6.4%)和26例(5.8%)(调整差- 0.7%)。外科医生评估的患者躁动率较低,内侧MAC(调整后平均差-0.33;95%CI -0.61 ~ -0.04)。结论:在局部或局部麻醉下行MOP的患者中,外化MAC策略(na / patient ratio为1:3)在严重高血压、心动过缓、低氧血症发生率和外科医生对患者安全的满意度方面不低于内部监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信