Location of Fibroblastic Foci: Does the Lesion You Observe Really Suggest Usual Interstitial Pneumonia?

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Hiroyuki Katsuragawa, Hiroaki Ito, Tomohiro Handa, Masatsugu Hamaji, Toshi Menju, Ryo Sakamoto, Hiroshi Date, Hironori Haga, Akihiko Yoshizawa
{"title":"Location of Fibroblastic Foci: Does the Lesion You Observe Really Suggest Usual Interstitial Pneumonia?","authors":"Hiroyuki Katsuragawa, Hiroaki Ito, Tomohiro Handa, Masatsugu Hamaji, Toshi Menju, Ryo Sakamoto, Hiroshi Date, Hironori Haga, Akihiko Yoshizawa","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fibroblastic foci (FF) are considered important findings of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP); however, they are not only specific to UIP but also observed in various fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Previous studies have reported the significance of FF comparing UIP with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) or secondary interstitial pneumonia, such as collagen vascular disease-related ILD (CVD-ILD) or fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP). However, only few studies have mentioned their location, and no reports have shown significant results regarding their location. This study aimed to compare the spatial distribution of FF across various forms of ILDs, based on anatomical location. Among patients who underwent lung transplantation at Kyoto University Hospital between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2023, those diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n = 24), idiopathic NSIP (n = 11), CVD-ILD (n = 36), and FHP (n = 12) were included, and 744 slides were obtained. FF were classified into 4 categories: peripheral, such as subpleural/paraseptal; intralobular, along the alveolar wall (aFF); centrilobular (cFF); and distorted or dense fibrotic lesions. The number of total and each location's FF/cm<sup>2</sup> were counted, and the percentage of each location's FF was calculated. IPF showed more total FF and peripheral FF than NSIP. FHP had more cFF than CVD (P = .026) and NSIP (P = .018). The dFF was higher in IPF than that in CVD (P = .018) and NSIP (P = .039). The aFF/total FF ratio was higher in CVD than that in FHP (P = .021) and IPF (P < .001). A high cFF/total FF ratio was correlated with FHP versus IPF (P = .032). In conclusion, FF with existing peripheral and distorted/dense fibrosis were more closely related to IPF, whereas cFF were highly correlated with FHP. Moreover, a high aFF/total FF ratio was suggestive of CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100675"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fibroblastic foci (FF) are considered important findings of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP); however, they are not only specific to UIP but also observed in various fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). Previous studies have reported the significance of FF comparing UIP with nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) or secondary interstitial pneumonia, such as collagen vascular disease-related ILD (CVD-ILD) or fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP). However, only few studies have mentioned their location, and no reports have shown significant results regarding their location. This study aimed to compare the spatial distribution of FF across various forms of ILDs, based on anatomical location. Among patients who underwent lung transplantation at Kyoto University Hospital between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2023, those diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n = 24), idiopathic NSIP (n = 11), CVD-ILD (n = 36), and FHP (n = 12) were included, and 744 slides were obtained. FF were classified into 4 categories: peripheral, such as subpleural/paraseptal; intralobular, along the alveolar wall (aFF); centrilobular (cFF); and distorted or dense fibrotic lesions. The number of total and each location's FF/cm2 were counted, and the percentage of each location's FF was calculated. IPF showed more total FF and peripheral FF than NSIP. FHP had more cFF than CVD (P = .026) and NSIP (P = .018). The dFF was higher in IPF than that in CVD (P = .018) and NSIP (P = .039). The aFF/total FF ratio was higher in CVD than that in FHP (P = .021) and IPF (P < .001). A high cFF/total FF ratio was correlated with FHP versus IPF (P = .032). In conclusion, FF with existing peripheral and distorted/dense fibrosis were more closely related to IPF, whereas cFF were highly correlated with FHP. Moreover, a high aFF/total FF ratio was suggestive of CVD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信