Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Worsening Kidney Function: A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 122,606 Acid-Suppressing Users.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09213-8
Antonio González-Pérez, Samuel J Martínez-Domínguez, Ángel Lanas, Aitor Lanas, Pablo Iñigo, Luis A García-Rodríguez
{"title":"Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Worsening Kidney Function: A Retrospective Cohort Study Including 122,606 Acid-Suppressing Users.","authors":"Antonio González-Pérez, Samuel J Martínez-Domínguez, Ángel Lanas, Aitor Lanas, Pablo Iñigo, Luis A García-Rodríguez","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09213-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use on worsening renal function is controversial and lacks a solid pathophysiological explanation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the risk of worsening renal function and acute kidney injury (AKI) in PPI initiators as compared with H2-blockers initiators.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using longitudinal records from BIGAN, a population-based health database of Aragón (Spain).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>PPIs (n = 119,520) and H2-blockers (n = 3,086) initiators between 2015 and 2020 with preserved renal function. They were followed until the occurrence of an adverse kidney event, death, lost to follow-up or June 2021.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Primary endpoints were worsening kidney function (measured as sCr ≥ 2 times baseline, eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>, a decrease in eGFR 30-50% from baseline or end stage renal disease) and AKI (measured by Aberdeen algorithm or hospitalization due to AKI). Incidence rates (IRs) per 1,000 persons-years were reported and Cox regression was used to calculate Hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for confounders.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Crude IRs for worsening kidney function were consistently lower for ranitidine than for PPIs (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m<sup>2</sup>: IR 18.7 95%CI (12.0-27.8) for ranitidine, IR 31.2 95%CI (29.9-32.5) for omeprazole). However, the risk of incident worsening function did not significantly differ in the Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounders (HR 0.99 95%CI (0.66-1.48) for omeprazole, as compared to ranitidine). PPI initiators consistently showed lower IRs of AKI using Aberdeen algorithm (IR 33.8 95%CI (32.4-35.1) for omeprazole, IR 52.8 95%CI (40.9-67.1) for ranitidine) and lower risk of AKI (HR 0.54 95%CI (0.42-0.70) for omeprazole, as compared to ranitidine).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No clinically relevant differences were observed for worsening kidney function between PPIs and H2-blockers initiators. PPIs users presented a reduced risk of AKI compared to ranitidine initiators.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"818-827"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11914685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09213-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) use on worsening renal function is controversial and lacks a solid pathophysiological explanation.

Objective: To assess the risk of worsening renal function and acute kidney injury (AKI) in PPI initiators as compared with H2-blockers initiators.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using longitudinal records from BIGAN, a population-based health database of Aragón (Spain).

Participants: PPIs (n = 119,520) and H2-blockers (n = 3,086) initiators between 2015 and 2020 with preserved renal function. They were followed until the occurrence of an adverse kidney event, death, lost to follow-up or June 2021.

Main measures: Primary endpoints were worsening kidney function (measured as sCr ≥ 2 times baseline, eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2, a decrease in eGFR 30-50% from baseline or end stage renal disease) and AKI (measured by Aberdeen algorithm or hospitalization due to AKI). Incidence rates (IRs) per 1,000 persons-years were reported and Cox regression was used to calculate Hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for confounders.

Key results: Crude IRs for worsening kidney function were consistently lower for ranitidine than for PPIs (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2: IR 18.7 95%CI (12.0-27.8) for ranitidine, IR 31.2 95%CI (29.9-32.5) for omeprazole). However, the risk of incident worsening function did not significantly differ in the Cox regression analysis adjusting for confounders (HR 0.99 95%CI (0.66-1.48) for omeprazole, as compared to ranitidine). PPI initiators consistently showed lower IRs of AKI using Aberdeen algorithm (IR 33.8 95%CI (32.4-35.1) for omeprazole, IR 52.8 95%CI (40.9-67.1) for ranitidine) and lower risk of AKI (HR 0.54 95%CI (0.42-0.70) for omeprazole, as compared to ranitidine).

Conclusions: No clinically relevant differences were observed for worsening kidney function between PPIs and H2-blockers initiators. PPIs users presented a reduced risk of AKI compared to ranitidine initiators.

质子泵抑制剂的使用和肾功能恶化:一项包括122,606名抑酸使用者的回顾性队列研究。
背景:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)使用对肾功能恶化的影响是有争议的,缺乏可靠的病理生理解释。目的:评估PPI启动剂与h2阻滞剂启动剂相比肾功能恶化和急性肾损伤(AKI)的风险。设计:回顾性队列研究,采用西班牙Aragón人口健康数据库BIGAN的纵向记录。参与者:2015年至2020年期间肾功能保持的PPIs (n = 119,520)和h2受体阻滞剂(n = 3,086)启动者。对他们进行随访,直到发生肾脏不良事件、死亡、随访失败或2021年6月。主要指标:主要终点是肾功能恶化(以sCr≥2倍基线、eGFR 2、eGFR较基线下降30-50%或终末期肾脏疾病来测量)和AKI(通过Aberdeen算法测量或因AKI住院)。报告了每1000人年的发病率(IRs),并使用Cox回归计算危险比(hr),对混杂因素进行了调整。关键结果:雷尼替丁对肾功能恶化的粗IR始终低于PPIs(雷尼替丁的eGFR 2: IR 18.7 95%CI(12.0-27.8),奥美拉唑的IR 31.2 95%CI(29.9-32.5))。然而,在校正混杂因素的Cox回归分析中,事件功能恶化的风险没有显著差异(奥美拉唑与雷尼替丁相比,HR 0.99 95%CI(0.66-1.48))。与雷尼替丁相比,PPI启动者一致显示,与雷尼替丁相比,奥美拉唑的IR (33.8 95%CI(32.4-35.1),雷尼替丁的IR (52.8 95%CI(40.9-67.1))较低的AKI风险(HR 0.54 95%CI(0.42-0.70))。结论:PPIs与h2受体阻滞剂启动剂在肾功能恶化方面无临床相关差异。与雷尼替丁起始剂相比,PPIs使用者出现AKI风险降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信