Influence of Nucleophosmin (NPM1) Genotypes on Outcome of Patients With AML: An AIEOP-BFM and COG-SWOG Intergroup Collaboration.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-10 Epub Date: 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1200/JCO-24-01715
Claudia Tregnago, Maddalena Benetton, Rhonda E Ries, Jack H Peplinski, Todd A Alonzo, Derek Stirewalt, Megan Othus, Nicolas Duployez, Edwin Sonneveld, Jonas Abrahamsson, Linda Fogelstrand, Nils von Neuhoff, Henrik Hasle, Dirk Reinhardt, Soheil Meshinchi, Franco Locatelli, Martina Pigazzi
{"title":"Influence of Nucleophosmin (<i>NPM1</i>) Genotypes on Outcome of Patients With AML: An AIEOP-BFM and COG-SWOG Intergroup Collaboration.","authors":"Claudia Tregnago, Maddalena Benetton, Rhonda E Ries, Jack H Peplinski, Todd A Alonzo, Derek Stirewalt, Megan Othus, Nicolas Duployez, Edwin Sonneveld, Jonas Abrahamsson, Linda Fogelstrand, Nils von Neuhoff, Henrik Hasle, Dirk Reinhardt, Soheil Meshinchi, Franco Locatelli, Martina Pigazzi","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-01715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several genomic subsets of <i>NPM1</i> mutations with varying sequences (type A, B, D, etc) have been identified. Despite molecular heterogeneity, <i>NPM1</i> mutations cumulatively portend a more favorable outcome, but biology and prognostic implications of different genomic subsets have not been extensively studied. In this multicentric study, we investigated the impact of <i>NPM1</i> genotypes on patient's outcomes and interrogated the underlying biology of the different subtypes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Of more than 4,000 patients enrolled in multiple pediatric cooperative (AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG, and COG trials), or adult (SWOG) trials, 348 pediatric and 75 adult AML patients with known <i>NPM1</i> genotype and available outcome were selected for this study. Diverse <i>NPM1</i> variants were correlated with the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Nuclear localization and translational efficiency of the <i>NPM1</i> variants was studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation of clinical outcome on the basis of <i>NPM1</i> genotypes showed that patients with type A, B, and other rare variants had similarly favorable outcomes, whereas those with type D had a significantly worse outcome (OS of 63% for type D <i>v</i> 86% for type non-D, <i>P</i> = .005). Multivariate analysis confirmed type D as an independent prognostic factor associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3; <i>P</i> = .005). In vitro, we demonstrated that in type D versus type A synonymous variants, codon optimality plays major roles in determining gene expression levels, and translation efficiency, which resulted in a more expressed <i>NPM1-D</i> mRNA and protein, mediating peculiar mitochondrial gene expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of specific <i>NPM1</i> genotypes identified AML patients with type D mutations being significantly associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a reclassification of D cases to higher-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"972-984"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Several genomic subsets of NPM1 mutations with varying sequences (type A, B, D, etc) have been identified. Despite molecular heterogeneity, NPM1 mutations cumulatively portend a more favorable outcome, but biology and prognostic implications of different genomic subsets have not been extensively studied. In this multicentric study, we investigated the impact of NPM1 genotypes on patient's outcomes and interrogated the underlying biology of the different subtypes.

Materials and methods: Of more than 4,000 patients enrolled in multiple pediatric cooperative (AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG, and COG trials), or adult (SWOG) trials, 348 pediatric and 75 adult AML patients with known NPM1 genotype and available outcome were selected for this study. Diverse NPM1 variants were correlated with the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Nuclear localization and translational efficiency of the NPM1 variants was studied.

Results: Evaluation of clinical outcome on the basis of NPM1 genotypes showed that patients with type A, B, and other rare variants had similarly favorable outcomes, whereas those with type D had a significantly worse outcome (OS of 63% for type D v 86% for type non-D, P = .005). Multivariate analysis confirmed type D as an independent prognostic factor associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3; P = .005). In vitro, we demonstrated that in type D versus type A synonymous variants, codon optimality plays major roles in determining gene expression levels, and translation efficiency, which resulted in a more expressed NPM1-D mRNA and protein, mediating peculiar mitochondrial gene expression.

Conclusion: The evaluation of specific NPM1 genotypes identified AML patients with type D mutations being significantly associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a reclassification of D cases to higher-risk groups.

核磷蛋白(NPM1)基因型对AML患者预后的影响:aiop - bfm和COG-SWOG组间合作
目的:已经确定了具有不同序列(A型,B型,D型等)的NPM1突变的几个基因组亚群。尽管存在分子异质性,NPM1突变累积预示着更有利的结果,但不同基因组亚群的生物学和预后意义尚未得到广泛研究。在这项多中心研究中,我们调查了NPM1基因型对患者预后的影响,并探究了不同亚型的潜在生物学特性。材料和方法:在4000多名儿童合作(AIEOP、BFM、ELAM02、NOPHO、DCOG和COG试验)或成人(SWOG)试验的患者中,348名已知NPM1基因型和可用结果的儿童和75名成人AML患者被选为本研究。不同的NPM1变异与总生存(OS)和无事件生存的概率相关。研究了NPM1变异的核定位和翻译效率。结果:基于NPM1基因型的临床结果评估显示,A型、B型和其他罕见变异患者的预后相似,而D型患者的预后明显较差(D型的OS为63%,非D型的OS为86%,P = 0.005)。多因素分析证实D型是与不良OS相关的独立预后因素(风险比,3;P = .005)。在体外,我们证明在D型和A型同义变异体中,密码子最优性在决定基因表达水平和翻译效率方面起主要作用,从而导致更多的NPM1-D mRNA和蛋白表达,介导特殊的线粒体基因表达。结论:对特定NPM1基因型的评估发现,D型突变的AML患者与不良预后显著相关,提示将D病例重新分类为高风险组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信