Claudia Tregnago, Maddalena Benetton, Rhonda E Ries, Jack H Peplinski, Todd A Alonzo, Derek Stirewalt, Megan Othus, Nicolas Duployez, Edwin Sonneveld, Jonas Abrahamsson, Linda Fogelstrand, Nils von Neuhoff, Henrik Hasle, Dirk Reinhardt, Soheil Meshinchi, Franco Locatelli, Martina Pigazzi
{"title":"Influence of Nucleophosmin (<i>NPM1</i>) Genotypes on Outcome of Patients With AML: An AIEOP-BFM and COG-SWOG Intergroup Collaboration.","authors":"Claudia Tregnago, Maddalena Benetton, Rhonda E Ries, Jack H Peplinski, Todd A Alonzo, Derek Stirewalt, Megan Othus, Nicolas Duployez, Edwin Sonneveld, Jonas Abrahamsson, Linda Fogelstrand, Nils von Neuhoff, Henrik Hasle, Dirk Reinhardt, Soheil Meshinchi, Franco Locatelli, Martina Pigazzi","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-01715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several genomic subsets of <i>NPM1</i> mutations with varying sequences (type A, B, D, etc) have been identified. Despite molecular heterogeneity, <i>NPM1</i> mutations cumulatively portend a more favorable outcome, but biology and prognostic implications of different genomic subsets have not been extensively studied. In this multicentric study, we investigated the impact of <i>NPM1</i> genotypes on patient's outcomes and interrogated the underlying biology of the different subtypes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Of more than 4,000 patients enrolled in multiple pediatric cooperative (AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG, and COG trials), or adult (SWOG) trials, 348 pediatric and 75 adult AML patients with known <i>NPM1</i> genotype and available outcome were selected for this study. Diverse <i>NPM1</i> variants were correlated with the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Nuclear localization and translational efficiency of the <i>NPM1</i> variants was studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evaluation of clinical outcome on the basis of <i>NPM1</i> genotypes showed that patients with type A, B, and other rare variants had similarly favorable outcomes, whereas those with type D had a significantly worse outcome (OS of 63% for type D <i>v</i> 86% for type non-D, <i>P</i> = .005). Multivariate analysis confirmed type D as an independent prognostic factor associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3; <i>P</i> = .005). In vitro, we demonstrated that in type D versus type A synonymous variants, codon optimality plays major roles in determining gene expression levels, and translation efficiency, which resulted in a more expressed <i>NPM1-D</i> mRNA and protein, mediating peculiar mitochondrial gene expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The evaluation of specific <i>NPM1</i> genotypes identified AML patients with type D mutations being significantly associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a reclassification of D cases to higher-risk groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"972-984"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-01715","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Several genomic subsets of NPM1 mutations with varying sequences (type A, B, D, etc) have been identified. Despite molecular heterogeneity, NPM1 mutations cumulatively portend a more favorable outcome, but biology and prognostic implications of different genomic subsets have not been extensively studied. In this multicentric study, we investigated the impact of NPM1 genotypes on patient's outcomes and interrogated the underlying biology of the different subtypes.
Materials and methods: Of more than 4,000 patients enrolled in multiple pediatric cooperative (AIEOP, BFM, ELAM02, NOPHO, DCOG, and COG trials), or adult (SWOG) trials, 348 pediatric and 75 adult AML patients with known NPM1 genotype and available outcome were selected for this study. Diverse NPM1 variants were correlated with the probabilities of overall survival (OS) and event-free survival. Nuclear localization and translational efficiency of the NPM1 variants was studied.
Results: Evaluation of clinical outcome on the basis of NPM1 genotypes showed that patients with type A, B, and other rare variants had similarly favorable outcomes, whereas those with type D had a significantly worse outcome (OS of 63% for type D v 86% for type non-D, P = .005). Multivariate analysis confirmed type D as an independent prognostic factor associated with inferior OS (hazard ratio, 3; P = .005). In vitro, we demonstrated that in type D versus type A synonymous variants, codon optimality plays major roles in determining gene expression levels, and translation efficiency, which resulted in a more expressed NPM1-D mRNA and protein, mediating peculiar mitochondrial gene expression.
Conclusion: The evaluation of specific NPM1 genotypes identified AML patients with type D mutations being significantly associated with inferior outcomes, suggesting a reclassification of D cases to higher-risk groups.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.