Verification of daily dose recalculation accuracy for an adaptive radiation therapy monitoring tool in helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
IF 2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
{"title":"Verification of daily dose recalculation accuracy for an adaptive radiation therapy monitoring tool in helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.","authors":"Yawitta Maneepan, Anirut Watcharawipha, Imjai Chitapanarux, Somsak Wanwilairat, Wannapha Nobnop","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>PreciseART, an adaptive radiation therapy (ART) software for helical tomotherapy (HT), was integrated into the Precision treatment planning system (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). It supports automatic monitoring of dose variations to both the target and organs at risk (OARs) throughout the treatment course. This study aims to verify the accuracy of PreciseART's automatic dose recalculation and assess the effectiveness of its notification function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Radixact X9's kVCT image-guided system (ClearRT) was used to acquire daily images for dose recalculations. We assessed the accuracy of PreciseART's automatic dose recalculation by comparing it with the treatment planning system (TPS) recalculation for the PTV70, spinal cord, and bilateral parotid glands. We also evaluated the efficacy of its notification function by comparing each dose metric for each notification color to TPS recalculation, assessing its role as a trigger tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the phantom study, dosimetric analysis indicated no statistically significant differences between TPS and PreciseART recalculations (p > 0.05), with dose variations under 1.5%. Similarly, in the patient study (n = 10), no significant dosimetric discrepancies were found (p > 0.05), with a maximum variation of 2.3%. The notification system performed effectively, providing accurate notifications in accordance with predefined dose criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PreciseART's daily dose recalculation demonstrated good agreement with TPS recalculation, and its notification function is effective for identifying dose threshold compliance, supporting its use in clinical ART.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: PreciseART, an adaptive radiation therapy (ART) software for helical tomotherapy (HT), was integrated into the Precision treatment planning system (Accuray, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). It supports automatic monitoring of dose variations to both the target and organs at risk (OARs) throughout the treatment course. This study aims to verify the accuracy of PreciseART's automatic dose recalculation and assess the effectiveness of its notification function.
Methods: The Radixact X9's kVCT image-guided system (ClearRT) was used to acquire daily images for dose recalculations. We assessed the accuracy of PreciseART's automatic dose recalculation by comparing it with the treatment planning system (TPS) recalculation for the PTV70, spinal cord, and bilateral parotid glands. We also evaluated the efficacy of its notification function by comparing each dose metric for each notification color to TPS recalculation, assessing its role as a trigger tool.
Results: In the phantom study, dosimetric analysis indicated no statistically significant differences between TPS and PreciseART recalculations (p > 0.05), with dose variations under 1.5%. Similarly, in the patient study (n = 10), no significant dosimetric discrepancies were found (p > 0.05), with a maximum variation of 2.3%. The notification system performed effectively, providing accurate notifications in accordance with predefined dose criteria.
Conclusions: PreciseART's daily dose recalculation demonstrated good agreement with TPS recalculation, and its notification function is effective for identifying dose threshold compliance, supporting its use in clinical ART.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic