Yohan A Walter, Anne N Hubbard, Phillip F Durham, Hsinshun T Wu
{"title":"Five-year evaluation of linear accelerator-based SRS platform isocentricity.","authors":"Yohan A Walter, Anne N Hubbard, Phillip F Durham, Hsinshun T Wu","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay in the management of intracranial tumors. However, the high fractional doses and sharp gradients used in SRS place heavy demands on geometric accuracy. Image guidance systems such as ExacTrac (ETX, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) have been developed to facilitate position verification at nonzero table angles. Though convenient, potential loss of mechanical rigidity between the imaging and treatment systems can be cause for concern, as the ETX system is not mounted to the rotating gantry. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 518 Winston-Lutz (WL) tests performed in the last 5 years with ETX alignment on our Elekta Versa HD (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) linear accelerator to determine the achievable limits of precision and stability over time for our LINAC-based SRS platform. Results demonstrated remarkable stability over time. 3D and directional misalignments never exceeded 1.0 mm over the study period; however, table rotation was shown to be the most significant source of positional uncertainty. Gantry sag, as measured by gun-to-target misalignments at the gantry-0 and gantry-180-degree positions, was consistent, measuring 1.23 ± 0.18 mm over the study period. Measured accuracy was well within acceptable tolerances for cranial SRS treatment delivery. Notably, the use of the ETX system for intrafraction repositioning effectively eliminates couch walkout, the most significant source of uncertainty identified in this study. Our results thus corroborate safe SRS treatment delivery on our Versa HD with ExacTrac image guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14597","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Linear accelerator (LINAC)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become a mainstay in the management of intracranial tumors. However, the high fractional doses and sharp gradients used in SRS place heavy demands on geometric accuracy. Image guidance systems such as ExacTrac (ETX, Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany) have been developed to facilitate position verification at nonzero table angles. Though convenient, potential loss of mechanical rigidity between the imaging and treatment systems can be cause for concern, as the ETX system is not mounted to the rotating gantry. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 518 Winston-Lutz (WL) tests performed in the last 5 years with ETX alignment on our Elekta Versa HD (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) linear accelerator to determine the achievable limits of precision and stability over time for our LINAC-based SRS platform. Results demonstrated remarkable stability over time. 3D and directional misalignments never exceeded 1.0 mm over the study period; however, table rotation was shown to be the most significant source of positional uncertainty. Gantry sag, as measured by gun-to-target misalignments at the gantry-0 and gantry-180-degree positions, was consistent, measuring 1.23 ± 0.18 mm over the study period. Measured accuracy was well within acceptable tolerances for cranial SRS treatment delivery. Notably, the use of the ETX system for intrafraction repositioning effectively eliminates couch walkout, the most significant source of uncertainty identified in this study. Our results thus corroborate safe SRS treatment delivery on our Versa HD with ExacTrac image guidance.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic