The effect of transition timing of regorafenib on treatment outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Li Hu, Zhoutian Yang, Zhenyun Yang, Wei Peng, Xiang Tang, Zhiwei Ye, Juncheng Wang, Yizhen Fu, Dandan Hu, Minshan Chen, Yaojun Zhang, Jinbin Chen
{"title":"The effect of transition timing of regorafenib on treatment outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.","authors":"Li Hu, Zhoutian Yang, Zhenyun Yang, Wei Peng, Xiang Tang, Zhiwei Ye, Juncheng Wang, Yizhen Fu, Dandan Hu, Minshan Chen, Yaojun Zhang, Jinbin Chen","doi":"10.1007/s12072-024-10757-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regorafenib is the recommended second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Our study aimed to assess the effect of transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib on treatment outcomes in uHCC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, patients were categorized into prompt transition group (PT group) or delayed transition group (DT group) based on the transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib following the first or subsequent occurrence of progressive disease during first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 85 and 122 patients in the PT and DT groups, respectively. The PT group demonstrated significantly better median PFS [4.5 months (95% CI 3.8-6.0) vs. 3.4 months (95% CI 2.8-4.1); HR 0.641; 95% CI 0.478-0.859; p = 0.003], ORR (24.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.007), DCR (69.4% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.049), and median OS [17.5 months (95% CI 13.4-not reached) vs. 10.4 months (95% CI 7.9-15.6); HR 0.613; 92% CI 0.432-0.871, p = 0.006] compared to the DT group. Moreover, the overall safety profiles were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prompt transition to second-line therapy with regorafenib following first-line treatment progression suggests better treatment outcomes and potentially longer survival than in patients who delay the transition to second-line therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10757-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regorafenib is the recommended second-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Our study aimed to assess the effect of transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib on treatment outcomes in uHCC patients.

Methods: In this retrospective study, patients were categorized into prompt transition group (PT group) or delayed transition group (DT group) based on the transition timing to second-line therapy with regorafenib following the first or subsequent occurrence of progressive disease during first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results: There were 85 and 122 patients in the PT and DT groups, respectively. The PT group demonstrated significantly better median PFS [4.5 months (95% CI 3.8-6.0) vs. 3.4 months (95% CI 2.8-4.1); HR 0.641; 95% CI 0.478-0.859; p = 0.003], ORR (24.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.007), DCR (69.4% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.049), and median OS [17.5 months (95% CI 13.4-not reached) vs. 10.4 months (95% CI 7.9-15.6); HR 0.613; 92% CI 0.432-0.871, p = 0.006] compared to the DT group. Moreover, the overall safety profiles were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: The prompt transition to second-line therapy with regorafenib following first-line treatment progression suggests better treatment outcomes and potentially longer survival than in patients who delay the transition to second-line therapy.

瑞非尼过渡时间对不可切除肝细胞癌治疗结果的影响:一项真实世界的研究。
背景:瑞非尼是不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)推荐的二线治疗药物。我们的研究旨在评估过渡到瑞非尼二线治疗的时机对uHCC患者治疗结果的影响。方法:在本回顾性研究中,根据一线治疗中首次或随后出现进展性疾病后向瑞非尼二线治疗过渡的时间,将患者分为及时过渡组(PT组)和延迟过渡组(DT组)。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点是客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。结果:PT组85例,DT组122例。PT组表现出明显更好的中位PFS[4.5个月(95% CI 3.8-6.0) vs. 3.4个月(95% CI 2.8-4.1);人力资源0.641;95% ci 0.478-0.859;p = 0.003], ORR (24.7% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.007), DCR (69.4% vs. 54.9%, p = 0.049),中位OS[17.5个月(95% CI 13.4-未达到)vs. 10.4个月(95% CI 7.9-15.6);人力资源0.613;92% CI 0.432-0.871, p = 0.006]与DT组比较。此外,两组之间的总体安全性具有可比性。结论:与延迟过渡到二线治疗的患者相比,在一线治疗进展后立即过渡到瑞戈非尼二线治疗提示更好的治疗结果和更长的生存期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信