Andrea Braga, Annalisa Vigna, Marta Barba, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Maurizio Serati, Matteo Frigerio
{"title":"Validated Questionnaires for the Assessment of Italian Patients with Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Andrea Braga, Annalisa Vigna, Marta Barba, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Maurizio Serati, Matteo Frigerio","doi":"10.1159/000542409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a pathological condition that significantly impacts women's health. It is therefore necessary to correctly diagnose it and offer the most appropriate treatment for her. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been established, which include questionnaires measuring quality of life (QoL) and symptoms. Although several English-language questionnaires are available to assess PFDs and QoL concerns, relatively few have been validated for use in Italian. With a focus on validated PROs in Italian for assessing PFDs, this article aimed to provide a systematic overview of the literature with useful information on references and advice on how to access each unique questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Up until March 1, 2024, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were utilized to locate validated Italian-language PFD surveys. The text provides instructions on how to receive a copy of the questionnaire if it has been identified and confirmed to be possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms, and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more. Italian PRO validation documents compared to the last analysis. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), the Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), the 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), the questionnaires from Vaizey and Wexner and the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) are among the specifically newly validated PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In order to encourage the use of suitable PROs while examining PFDs in Italian patients, this systematic review is meant to be a useful tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a pathological condition that significantly impacts women's health. It is therefore necessary to correctly diagnose it and offer the most appropriate treatment for her. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been established, which include questionnaires measuring quality of life (QoL) and symptoms. Although several English-language questionnaires are available to assess PFDs and QoL concerns, relatively few have been validated for use in Italian. With a focus on validated PROs in Italian for assessing PFDs, this article aimed to provide a systematic overview of the literature with useful information on references and advice on how to access each unique questionnaire.
Methods: Up until March 1, 2024, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were utilized to locate validated Italian-language PFD surveys. The text provides instructions on how to receive a copy of the questionnaire if it has been identified and confirmed to be possible.
Results: Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms, and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more. Italian PRO validation documents compared to the last analysis. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), the Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), the 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), the questionnaires from Vaizey and Wexner and the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) are among the specifically newly validated PROs.
Conclusions: In order to encourage the use of suitable PROs while examining PFDs in Italian patients, this systematic review is meant to be a useful tool.
期刊介绍:
This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.