Validated Questionnaires for the Assessment of Italian Patients with Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: A Systematic Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Andrea Braga, Annalisa Vigna, Marta Barba, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Maurizio Serati, Matteo Frigerio
{"title":"Validated Questionnaires for the Assessment of Italian Patients with Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Andrea Braga, Annalisa Vigna, Marta Barba, Giorgio Caccia, Andrea Papadia, Maria Rosaria Campitiello, Maurizio Serati, Matteo Frigerio","doi":"10.1159/000542409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a pathological condition that significantly impacts women's health. It is therefore necessary to correctly diagnose it and offer the most appropriate treatment for her. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been established, which include questionnaires measuring quality of life (QoL) and symptoms. Although several English-language questionnaires are available to assess PFDs and QoL concerns, relatively few have been validated for use in Italian. With a focus on validated PROs in Italian for assessing PFDs, this article aimed to provide a systematic overview of the literature with useful information on references and advice on how to access each unique questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Up until March 1, 2024, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were utilized to locate validated Italian-language PFD surveys. The text provides instructions on how to receive a copy of the questionnaire if it has been identified and confirmed to be possible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms, and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more. Italian PRO validation documents compared to the last analysis. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), the Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), the 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), the questionnaires from Vaizey and Wexner and the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) are among the specifically newly validated PROs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In order to encourage the use of suitable PROs while examining PFDs in Italian patients, this systematic review is meant to be a useful tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is a pathological condition that significantly impacts women's health. It is therefore necessary to correctly diagnose it and offer the most appropriate treatment for her. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been established, which include questionnaires measuring quality of life (QoL) and symptoms. Although several English-language questionnaires are available to assess PFDs and QoL concerns, relatively few have been validated for use in Italian. With a focus on validated PROs in Italian for assessing PFDs, this article aimed to provide a systematic overview of the literature with useful information on references and advice on how to access each unique questionnaire.

Methods: Up until March 1, 2024, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The PubMed/MEDLINE databases and websites were utilized to locate validated Italian-language PFD surveys. The text provides instructions on how to receive a copy of the questionnaire if it has been identified and confirmed to be possible.

Results: Thirty-five Italian-validated questionnaires were included: 17 out of 35 (48.6%) questionnaires focused on lower urinary tract symptoms, 1 (2.8%) on genital prolapse symptoms, 8 (22.8%) on sexuality, 3 (8.6%) on bowel symptoms, and 6 (17.2%) on pelvic dysfunctions. The literature search turned up seven more. Italian PRO validation documents compared to the last analysis. The Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), the Sexual Desire and Erotic Fantasies (SDEF) Questionnaire, the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales (SIS/SES), the 12-Item Sexual Distress Scale (SDS) and 5-Item Sexual Distress Scale-Short Form (SDS-SF), the questionnaires from Vaizey and Wexner and the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI), the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20), and the Intermittent Catheterization Acceptance Test (I-CAT) are among the specifically newly validated PROs.

Conclusions: In order to encourage the use of suitable PROs while examining PFDs in Italian patients, this systematic review is meant to be a useful tool.

评估意大利盆底功能障碍患者的有效问卷:一项系统综述。
背景:盆底功能障碍(PFDs)具有复杂的、多因素的病理生理,影响妇女的健康,必须确定以提供最适当的护理和治疗。因此,症状和生活质量(QoL)问卷,简单地确定为患者报告的结果(PROs),已经开发出来。尽管有大量的问卷可用英文来评估方案规划和生活质量有关的问题,但其中很少有意大利语的有效问卷。目的:本文的目的是系统地回顾关于PFDs评估的意大利语验证pro的文献,以及文献参考的实用信息和如何获得每个单独问卷的建议。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行系统评价,直至2024年3月1日。使用PubMed/MEDLINE数据库和网站为pfd确定有效的意大利语问卷。一旦确定,就检查是否有可能获得一份调查表,并在案文中说明了获得一份调查表的步骤。结果:纳入35份意大利验证问卷:35份问卷中有17份(48.6%)关注下尿路症状,1份(2.8%)关注生殖器脱垂症状,8份(22.8%)关注性行为,3份(8.6%)关注肠道症状,6份(17.2%)关注盆腔功能障碍。文献检索比之前的综述多发现了7篇意大利PRO验证论文。具体来说,新验证的优点包括:盆腔器官脱出/尿失禁性问卷(PISQ-12)、性欲与性幻想问卷(SDEF)、性抑制/性兴奋量表(SIS/SES)、12项性困扰量表(SDS)和5项性困扰量表-短表(SDS- sf)、Vaizey和Wexner及大便失禁严重程度指数(FISI)问卷、盆底困扰量表(PFDI-20)问卷、间歇导尿接受测试(I-CAT)。结论和展望:本系统综述旨在成为一种工具,以促进在研究意大利pfd患者时采用适当的PROs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信