Risk of respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders associated with endothelin receptor antagonists and prostacyclin-related drugs in pulmonary hypertension: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-03 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2436077
Fengjie Tang, Qihuan Ma, Yinghong Liu, Xiaojuan Yang
{"title":"Risk of respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders associated with endothelin receptor antagonists and prostacyclin-related drugs in pulmonary hypertension: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS.","authors":"Fengjie Tang, Qihuan Ma, Yinghong Liu, Xiaojuan Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2436077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug events (ADEs) for endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and prostacyclin-related drugs (PRDs) have been reported in clinical trials, but large-scale, real-world evaluations for respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (RTMD) remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database (Q1 2004~Q2 2024) used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method for disproportionality analysis to assess the adverse drug events (ADEs) of ERAs and PRDs in pulmonary arterial hypertension, focusing on risks related to RTMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reports of ADEs for ERAs (bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan) were 15,286, 36795, and 17,497, respectively, and for PRDs (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, and selexipag) were 5,477, 57265, 3,247, and 5,504. Females exceeded males, with most cases in adults. The top PTs for ERAs were death, dyspnea, and pneumonia, with bosentan linked to liver impairment. PRDs commonly cause headaches, flushing, hypotension, edema, and fluid retention. Dyspnea was the most reported RTMD risk for all drugs, and nasal congestion was noted for all. Selexipag had the fewest RTMD-related PTs, and iloprost had the strongest signal for hemoptysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis highlights the RTMD risks of ERAs and PRDs in treating PH and underscores the need for careful monitoring of ADEs to ensure their safe and effective use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"487-498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2436077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adverse drug events (ADEs) for endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and prostacyclin-related drugs (PRDs) have been reported in clinical trials, but large-scale, real-world evaluations for respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (RTMD) remain scarce.

Methods: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database (Q1 2004~Q2 2024) used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method for disproportionality analysis to assess the adverse drug events (ADEs) of ERAs and PRDs in pulmonary arterial hypertension, focusing on risks related to RTMD.

Results: Reports of ADEs for ERAs (bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan) were 15,286, 36795, and 17,497, respectively, and for PRDs (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, and selexipag) were 5,477, 57265, 3,247, and 5,504. Females exceeded males, with most cases in adults. The top PTs for ERAs were death, dyspnea, and pneumonia, with bosentan linked to liver impairment. PRDs commonly cause headaches, flushing, hypotension, edema, and fluid retention. Dyspnea was the most reported RTMD risk for all drugs, and nasal congestion was noted for all. Selexipag had the fewest RTMD-related PTs, and iloprost had the strongest signal for hemoptysis.

Conclusion: The analysis highlights the RTMD risks of ERAs and PRDs in treating PH and underscores the need for careful monitoring of ADEs to ensure their safe and effective use in clinical practice.

肺动脉高压患者与内皮素受体拮抗剂和前列环素相关药物相关的呼吸、胸腔和纵隔疾病的风险:基于FAERS的歧化分析
背景:内皮素受体拮抗剂(ERAs)和前列环素相关药物(PRDs)的不良药物事件(ADEs)已在临床试验中报道,但对呼吸、胸部和纵隔疾病(RTMD)的大规模、真实的评估仍然很少。方法:对FAERS数据库(2004年第一季度~ 2024年第二季度)进行药物警戒分析,采用报告优势比(ROR)法进行歧化分析,评估ERAs和PRDs在肺动脉高压中的药物不良事件(ADEs),重点分析RTMD的相关风险。结果:ERAs(波生坦、氨布里森坦和马西坦)的不良反应报告分别为15,286、36795和17,497例,PRDs (epoprostenol、treprostinil、iloprost和selexipag)的不良反应报告为5,477、57265、3,247和5,504例。女性多于男性,大多数病例发生在成年人身上。ERAs的最高PTs是死亡、呼吸困难和肺炎,波生坦与肝损害有关。prd通常会引起头痛、脸红、低血压、水肿和液体潴留。呼吸困难是所有药物中报告的RTMD风险最多的,鼻塞是所有药物中都注意到的。Selexipag有最少的rtmd相关PTs, iloprost有最强的咯血信号。结论:该分析强调了ERAs和PRDs治疗PH的RTMD风险,并强调需要仔细监测ADEs以确保其在临床实践中的安全有效使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信