Risk of respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders associated with endothelin receptor antagonists and prostacyclin-related drugs in pulmonary hypertension: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS.
Fengjie Tang, Qihuan Ma, Yinghong Liu, Xiaojuan Yang
{"title":"Risk of respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders associated with endothelin receptor antagonists and prostacyclin-related drugs in pulmonary hypertension: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS.","authors":"Fengjie Tang, Qihuan Ma, Yinghong Liu, Xiaojuan Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2436077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adverse drug events (ADEs) for endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and prostacyclin-related drugs (PRDs) have been reported in clinical trials, but large-scale, real-world evaluations for respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (RTMD) remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database (Q1 2004~Q2 2024) used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method for disproportionality analysis to assess the adverse drug events (ADEs) of ERAs and PRDs in pulmonary arterial hypertension, focusing on risks related to RTMD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reports of ADEs for ERAs (bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan) were 15,286, 36795, and 17,497, respectively, and for PRDs (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, and selexipag) were 5,477, 57265, 3,247, and 5,504. Females exceeded males, with most cases in adults. The top PTs for ERAs were death, dyspnea, and pneumonia, with bosentan linked to liver impairment. PRDs commonly cause headaches, flushing, hypotension, edema, and fluid retention. Dyspnea was the most reported RTMD risk for all drugs, and nasal congestion was noted for all. Selexipag had the fewest RTMD-related PTs, and iloprost had the strongest signal for hemoptysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The analysis highlights the RTMD risks of ERAs and PRDs in treating PH and underscores the need for careful monitoring of ADEs to ensure their safe and effective use in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"487-498"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2436077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adverse drug events (ADEs) for endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and prostacyclin-related drugs (PRDs) have been reported in clinical trials, but large-scale, real-world evaluations for respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders (RTMD) remain scarce.
Methods: A pharmacovigilance analysis of the FAERS database (Q1 2004~Q2 2024) used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method for disproportionality analysis to assess the adverse drug events (ADEs) of ERAs and PRDs in pulmonary arterial hypertension, focusing on risks related to RTMD.
Results: Reports of ADEs for ERAs (bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan) were 15,286, 36795, and 17,497, respectively, and for PRDs (epoprostenol, treprostinil, iloprost, and selexipag) were 5,477, 57265, 3,247, and 5,504. Females exceeded males, with most cases in adults. The top PTs for ERAs were death, dyspnea, and pneumonia, with bosentan linked to liver impairment. PRDs commonly cause headaches, flushing, hypotension, edema, and fluid retention. Dyspnea was the most reported RTMD risk for all drugs, and nasal congestion was noted for all. Selexipag had the fewest RTMD-related PTs, and iloprost had the strongest signal for hemoptysis.
Conclusion: The analysis highlights the RTMD risks of ERAs and PRDs in treating PH and underscores the need for careful monitoring of ADEs to ensure their safe and effective use in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.