Improving Cardiogenic Shock Team Activation Through Nurse Education and Alert Implementation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Suzanne Krais, Jenelle Sheasby, Jasjit Banwait, Natalie Lewis, Zhaoli Liu
{"title":"Improving Cardiogenic Shock Team Activation Through Nurse Education and Alert Implementation.","authors":"Suzanne Krais, Jenelle Sheasby, Jasjit Banwait, Natalie Lewis, Zhaoli Liu","doi":"10.4037/ccn2024259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with cardiogenic shock have a 25% to 50% mortality rate despite the introduction of mechanical circulatory devices and coordinated medical treatment. The use of shock teams has improved outcomes for these patients.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>A cardiovascular hospital with a multidisciplinary shock team had inconsistency and delays in recognition and diagnosis of patients with cardiogenic shock.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nurse-led, preintervention-postintervention quality improvement project was performed in April and May 2021 and in April and May 2022 within a cardiovascular hospital in north Texas. The 2 nursing staff interventions regarding shock team activation were education and shock alert implementation. Time from first signs to diagnosis (for inpatients) and time from initial transfer request to acceptance (for transferring patients) were measured. Descriptive and statistical analyses were conducted using R, version 4.0.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) time to diagnosis of cardiogenic shock decreased significantly from 17.98 (28.39) hours in the preintervention group (n = 25) to 8.15 (12.26) hours in the postintervention group (n = 45; P = .045). For patients with cardiogenic shock transferring from referring hospitals, the median (IQR) time to acceptance was 1.55 (0.08-3.18) hours in the preintervention group and 0.35 (0.00-0.72) hours in the postintervention group (P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nursing staff interventions regarding shock team activation significantly improved the time of diagnosis and acceptance of patients with cardiogenic shock in a cardiovascular hospital, enhancing the overall quality of care provided to these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10738,"journal":{"name":"Critical care nurse","volume":"44 6","pages":"24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care nurse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2024259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with cardiogenic shock have a 25% to 50% mortality rate despite the introduction of mechanical circulatory devices and coordinated medical treatment. The use of shock teams has improved outcomes for these patients.

Local problem: A cardiovascular hospital with a multidisciplinary shock team had inconsistency and delays in recognition and diagnosis of patients with cardiogenic shock.

Methods: A nurse-led, preintervention-postintervention quality improvement project was performed in April and May 2021 and in April and May 2022 within a cardiovascular hospital in north Texas. The 2 nursing staff interventions regarding shock team activation were education and shock alert implementation. Time from first signs to diagnosis (for inpatients) and time from initial transfer request to acceptance (for transferring patients) were measured. Descriptive and statistical analyses were conducted using R, version 4.0.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing).

Results: The mean (SD) time to diagnosis of cardiogenic shock decreased significantly from 17.98 (28.39) hours in the preintervention group (n = 25) to 8.15 (12.26) hours in the postintervention group (n = 45; P = .045). For patients with cardiogenic shock transferring from referring hospitals, the median (IQR) time to acceptance was 1.55 (0.08-3.18) hours in the preintervention group and 0.35 (0.00-0.72) hours in the postintervention group (P < .001).

Conclusions: Nursing staff interventions regarding shock team activation significantly improved the time of diagnosis and acceptance of patients with cardiogenic shock in a cardiovascular hospital, enhancing the overall quality of care provided to these patients.

通过护士教育和警报实施提高心源性休克小组的激活。
背景:心源性休克患者的死亡率为25% - 50%,尽管引入了机械循环装置和协调的医疗治疗。使用休克小组改善了这些患者的预后。局部问题:一家拥有多学科休克小组的心血管医院对心源性休克患者的识别和诊断存在不一致和延误。方法:于2021年4月和5月以及2022年4月和5月在德克萨斯州北部的一家心血管医院进行了一项由护士主导的干预前-干预后质量改善项目。护理人员对休克小组激活的干预措施包括教育和休克警报的实施。测量从首次症状到诊断(住院患者)和从最初转院请求到接受(转院患者)的时间。使用R 4.0.0版本(R Foundation for statistical Computing)进行描述性和统计分析。结果:心源性休克诊断的平均(SD)时间由干预前组(n = 25)的17.98(28.39)小时显著缩短至干预后组(n = 45)的8.15(12.26)小时;P = .045)。从转诊医院转来的心源性休克患者,干预前组到接收的中位(IQR)时间为1.55(0.08 ~ 3.18)小时,干预后组为0.35(0.000 ~ 0.72)小时,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。结论:护理人员对休克小组激活的干预措施显著提高了心血管医院心源性休克患者的诊断时间和接受度,提高了对这些患者的整体护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical care nurse
Critical care nurse 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Care Nurse (CCN) is an official publication of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses (AACN). Authors are invited to submit manuscripts for consideration and peer review. Clinical topics must meet the mission of CCN and address nursing practice of acute and critically ill patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信