At-Home Self-Collection of Pharmacokinetic Data: Design and Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Feasibility Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-04 DOI:10.1002/cpdd.1495
Arash Raoufinia, Susan E Shoaf, Brian Rothman, Chelsea Ye, Chris Chung
{"title":"At-Home Self-Collection of Pharmacokinetic Data: Design and Results From a Phase 1 Open-Label Feasibility Trial.","authors":"Arash Raoufinia, Susan E Shoaf, Brian Rothman, Chelsea Ye, Chris Chung","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies pose unique technical challenges. We present the design of a Phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence, PK trial that aimed to compare the timing accuracy of participant- versus staff-collected data, and we provide safety and tolerability outcomes for centanafadine treatment. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years received a single 100-mg centanafadine sustained-release tablet at Visits 1, 2, and 4. PK samples (venous sampling and blood microsampling) and safety assessments (12-lead electrocardiograms [ECGs] and vital signs) were collected by clinical site staff only at Visit 1. At Visit 2, site staff collected venous blood, and participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs under staff supervision. At Visit 4, participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs remotely. The absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times for PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs are reported descriptively. Of the 20 participants, at least 75% obtained blood microsamples within 10 minutes of the planned nominal time. Absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times of ECGs and vital signs were small. No adverse events were related to treatment. Overall, results support the feasibility of at-home collection of PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":"11-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1495","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies pose unique technical challenges. We present the design of a Phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence, PK trial that aimed to compare the timing accuracy of participant- versus staff-collected data, and we provide safety and tolerability outcomes for centanafadine treatment. Healthy adults aged 18-55 years received a single 100-mg centanafadine sustained-release tablet at Visits 1, 2, and 4. PK samples (venous sampling and blood microsampling) and safety assessments (12-lead electrocardiograms [ECGs] and vital signs) were collected by clinical site staff only at Visit 1. At Visit 2, site staff collected venous blood, and participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs under staff supervision. At Visit 4, participants obtained blood microsamples, a 6-lead ECG, and vital signs remotely. The absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times for PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs are reported descriptively. Of the 20 participants, at least 75% obtained blood microsamples within 10 minutes of the planned nominal time. Absolute differences between actual and scheduled collection times of ECGs and vital signs were small. No adverse events were related to treatment. Overall, results support the feasibility of at-home collection of PK samples, ECGs, and vital signs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信