Investigating pain-related medication use and contribution to polypharmacy in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Christine Pacitti, Deborah Cairns, Laura Ward, Barbara I Nicholl
{"title":"Investigating pain-related medication use and contribution to polypharmacy in adults with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review.","authors":"Christine Pacitti, Deborah Cairns, Laura Ward, Barbara I Nicholl","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03770-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with intellectual disability experience more pain than adults without and, despite a higher number of medications being prescribed, may be less likely to receive medication for pain. We conducted a systematic review of existing literature on medication for pain and painful conditions in adults with intellectual disability to explore if there is any association with polypharmacy, multimorbidity or demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched from January 2000 to 21st October 2024. We included original, peer-reviewed observational, qualitative or mixed-method studies published in English with data on medication for pain or painful conditions in adults with intellectual disability. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies was used for quality assessment of included studies and findings were reported via narrative synthesis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415051.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven of 26,170 articles met the eligibility criteria. Adults with intellectual disability were more likely to have simple analgesic medication than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids or adjuvant pain medications than the general population. Psychotropic medications were more commonly prescribed in adults with intellectual disability than medication for pain or painful conditions. Adults with intellectual disability and caregivers reported under-recognition and most likely under-treatment of pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults with intellectual disability may receive less pharmacological management of pain with analgesics and medication for painful conditions despite the high prevalence of polypharmacy, suggesting pain is under-treated. Better assessment and pharmacological treatment of pain and painful conditions is a key future research priority to address this health inequality and improve quality of life for this vulnerable group of people.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"565"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11610167/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03770-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adults with intellectual disability experience more pain than adults without and, despite a higher number of medications being prescribed, may be less likely to receive medication for pain. We conducted a systematic review of existing literature on medication for pain and painful conditions in adults with intellectual disability to explore if there is any association with polypharmacy, multimorbidity or demographic characteristics.

Methods: This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library and Scopus were searched from January 2000 to 21st October 2024. We included original, peer-reviewed observational, qualitative or mixed-method studies published in English with data on medication for pain or painful conditions in adults with intellectual disability. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme for qualitative studies was used for quality assessment of included studies and findings were reported via narrative synthesis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023415051.

Results: Twenty-seven of 26,170 articles met the eligibility criteria. Adults with intellectual disability were more likely to have simple analgesic medication than non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, opioids or adjuvant pain medications than the general population. Psychotropic medications were more commonly prescribed in adults with intellectual disability than medication for pain or painful conditions. Adults with intellectual disability and caregivers reported under-recognition and most likely under-treatment of pain.

Conclusions: Adults with intellectual disability may receive less pharmacological management of pain with analgesics and medication for painful conditions despite the high prevalence of polypharmacy, suggesting pain is under-treated. Better assessment and pharmacological treatment of pain and painful conditions is a key future research priority to address this health inequality and improve quality of life for this vulnerable group of people.

调查成人智障患者疼痛相关药物的使用及其对多重用药的贡献:一项系统综述。
背景:智力残疾的成年人比没有智力残疾的成年人经历更多的疼痛,尽管开出了更多的药物,但他们接受治疗疼痛的可能性更小。我们对现有的关于成人智力残疾患者疼痛和疼痛状况的药物治疗文献进行了系统的回顾,以探讨是否与多药、多病或人口统计学特征有关。方法:本系统综述遵循PRISMA指南。检索时间为2000年1月至2024年10月21日的Medline、Embase、PubMed、PsycINFO、Web of Science、CINAHL、Cochrane Library和Scopus。我们纳入了原始的、同行评议的、观察性的、定性的或混合方法的研究,这些研究用英文发表,有关于治疗成人智力残疾患者疼痛或疼痛状况的药物数据。两名独立审稿人进行研究选择、数据提取和质量评估;分歧由第三位审稿人解决。适用于定性研究的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表或关键评估技能计划用于纳入研究的质量评估,并通过叙事综合报告研究结果。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023415051。结果:26170篇文章中有27篇符合入选标准。与一般人群相比,智力残疾的成年人更有可能使用简单的镇痛药物,而不是非甾体抗炎药、阿片类药物或辅助止痛药。与治疗疼痛或疼痛状况的药物相比,精神药物更常用于智力残疾的成年人。智力残疾的成年人和照顾者报告说,他们对疼痛的认识不足,而且很可能治疗不足。结论:尽管多种药物治疗的发生率很高,但成年智力残疾患者可能较少使用镇痛药和药物治疗疼痛,这表明疼痛治疗不足。更好地评估和药物治疗疼痛和疼痛状况是解决这一健康不平等和改善这一弱势群体生活质量的未来关键研究重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信