Guidelines for assessing ventricular pressure-volume relationships in rodents.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Oliver H Wearing, Naomi C Chesler, Mitchel J Colebank, Timothy A Hacker, John N Lorenz, Jeremy A Simpson, Christopher R West
{"title":"Guidelines for assessing ventricular pressure-volume relationships in rodents.","authors":"Oliver H Wearing, Naomi C Chesler, Mitchel J Colebank, Timothy A Hacker, John N Lorenz, Jeremy A Simpson, Christopher R West","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.00434.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ventricular catheterization with a pressure-volume (PV) catheter is the gold-standard method for assessing in vivo cardiac function in animal studies, providing valuable \"load-independent\" indices of systolic and diastolic heart performance. PV studies are commonly performed to elucidate mechanistic insights into cardiovascular disease using surgical and genetically engineered rat and mouse models, but there is considerable heterogeneity in how these studies are performed. Wide variation in protocol design, volume calibration, anesthesia, manipulation of cardiac loading conditions, how load-independent indices of cardiac function are derived, as well as in data analysis and reporting is constraining reliability and reproducibility in the field. The purpose of this manuscript is to combine our collective expertise in performing open- and closed-chest left and right ventricle PV studies in rodents to provide consensus guidelines on how to perform, analyze, and interpret these studies using either conductance or admittance PV catheters. We first review recent methodological reporting in rodent PV studies in this journal and discuss important details required to improve reproducibility within and across PV studies. We then recommend steps to obtain high-quality PV data, from volume calibration to choice of anesthetic agent and acquiring load-independent indices of both systolic and diastolic function. We also consider between- and within-animal variation and recommend how to perform data analysis and visualization. We hope that this consensus paper guides those performing PV studies in rodents and helps align the field with best practices in surgical/analytical methodologies and reporting, facilitating better reliability and reproducibility in the PV field.</p>","PeriodicalId":7692,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","volume":" ","pages":"H120-H140"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00434.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ventricular catheterization with a pressure-volume (PV) catheter is the gold-standard method for assessing in vivo cardiac function in animal studies, providing valuable "load-independent" indices of systolic and diastolic heart performance. PV studies are commonly performed to elucidate mechanistic insights into cardiovascular disease using surgical and genetically engineered rat and mouse models, but there is considerable heterogeneity in how these studies are performed. Wide variation in protocol design, volume calibration, anesthesia, manipulation of cardiac loading conditions, how load-independent indices of cardiac function are derived, as well as in data analysis and reporting is constraining reliability and reproducibility in the field. The purpose of this manuscript is to combine our collective expertise in performing open- and closed-chest left and right ventricle PV studies in rodents to provide consensus guidelines on how to perform, analyze, and interpret these studies using either conductance or admittance PV catheters. We first review recent methodological reporting in rodent PV studies in this journal and discuss important details required to improve reproducibility within and across PV studies. We then recommend steps to obtain high-quality PV data, from volume calibration to choice of anesthetic agent and acquiring load-independent indices of both systolic and diastolic function. We also consider between- and within-animal variation and recommend how to perform data analysis and visualization. We hope that this consensus paper guides those performing PV studies in rodents and helps align the field with best practices in surgical/analytical methodologies and reporting, facilitating better reliability and reproducibility in the PV field.

评估啮齿动物心室压力-容积关系的指南。
在动物研究中,使用压力-容量(PV)导管进行心室导管置入是评估体内心功能的金标准方法,它提供了有价值的心脏收缩和舒张表现的“负荷无关”指标。PV研究通常通过外科手术和基因工程大鼠和小鼠模型来阐明心血管疾病的机制,但这些研究的实施方式存在相当大的异质性。方案设计、容量校准、麻醉、心脏负荷条件的操作、如何推导与负荷无关的心功能指标以及数据分析和报告等方面的差异很大,限制了该领域的可靠性和可重复性。该手稿的目的是结合我们在啮齿动物中进行开胸和闭胸左心室和右心室PV研究的集体专业知识,就如何使用电导或导纳PV导管进行,分析和解释这些研究提供共识指南。我们首先回顾了最近啮齿动物PV研究的方法学报告,并讨论了提高PV研究内部和跨PV研究可重复性所需的重要细节。然后,我们推荐获得高质量PV数据的步骤,从体积校准到麻醉剂的选择,以及获得收缩期和舒张期功能的负荷无关指标。我们还考虑了动物之间和动物内部的差异,并建议如何进行数据分析和可视化。我们希望这篇共识论文能够指导那些在啮齿动物中进行PV研究的人,并帮助该领域与外科/分析方法和报告的最佳实践保持一致,从而促进PV领域更好的可靠性和可重复性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology publishes original investigations, reviews and perspectives on the physiology of the heart, vasculature, and lymphatics. These articles include experimental and theoretical studies of cardiovascular function at all levels of organization ranging from the intact and integrative animal and organ function to the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal embraces new descriptions of these functions and their control systems, as well as their basis in biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology. Preference is given to research that provides significant new mechanistic physiological insights that determine the performance of the normal and abnormal heart and circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信