Thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry guided algorithms in bleeding patients: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A D Kvisselgaard, S A Wolthers, A Wikkelsø, L B Holst, B Drivenes, A Afshari
{"title":"Thromboelastography or rotational thromboelastometry guided algorithms in bleeding patients: An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.","authors":"A D Kvisselgaard, S A Wolthers, A Wikkelsø, L B Holst, B Drivenes, A Afshari","doi":"10.1111/aas.14558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bleeding patients face significant morbidity and mortality due to impaired haemostasis. Haemostatic resuscitation has evolved, yet the optimal approach remains unclear. The primary objective was to assess the benefits and risks of transfusion guided by TEG/ROTEM versus standard of care in bleeding patients in an updated review.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis was conducted according to Cochrane Collaboration methodology, PRISMA and GRADE guidelines. A literature search was conducted in five major databases. Both paediatric and adult patients were included. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes were the administration of blood products, blood loss, surgical reintervention, and dialysis-dependent renal injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This systematic review included 31 randomised trials (n = 2756), with most patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. TEG-/ROTEM-guided algorithms reduced the amount of transfused fresh frozen plasma (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.32-0.72, I<sup>2</sup>: 94%), platelets (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.55-0.91, I<sup>2</sup>: 57%), the risk for surgical reintervention (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.94, I<sup>2</sup>: 0%), and bleeding with a standard mean difference of -0.31 (95% CI -0.55 to -0.08, I<sup>2</sup>: 75%). No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00, I<sup>2</sup>: 5%). According to GRADE methodology, the certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes. Trial sequential analysis of mortality analysis indicated that 54% of the optimal information size was reached with an alpha-boundary RR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEG-/ROTEM-guided transfusion algorithms may reduce the risk of mortality, bleeding volume, and the need for fresh frozen plasma and platelets, but the evidence is very uncertain. Further, the results were primarily based on the adult population undergoing elective cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 1","pages":"e14558"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bleeding patients face significant morbidity and mortality due to impaired haemostasis. Haemostatic resuscitation has evolved, yet the optimal approach remains unclear. The primary objective was to assess the benefits and risks of transfusion guided by TEG/ROTEM versus standard of care in bleeding patients in an updated review.

Methods: This systematic review of randomised controlled trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis was conducted according to Cochrane Collaboration methodology, PRISMA and GRADE guidelines. A literature search was conducted in five major databases. Both paediatric and adult patients were included. The primary outcome was mortality, and secondary outcomes were the administration of blood products, blood loss, surgical reintervention, and dialysis-dependent renal injury.

Results: This systematic review included 31 randomised trials (n = 2756), with most patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. TEG-/ROTEM-guided algorithms reduced the amount of transfused fresh frozen plasma (RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.32-0.72, I2: 94%), platelets (RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.55-0.91, I2: 57%), the risk for surgical reintervention (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.94, I2: 0%), and bleeding with a standard mean difference of -0.31 (95% CI -0.55 to -0.08, I2: 75%). No statistically significant difference was demonstrated for mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00, I2: 5%). According to GRADE methodology, the certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes. Trial sequential analysis of mortality analysis indicated that 54% of the optimal information size was reached with an alpha-boundary RR of 0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.03).

Conclusions: TEG-/ROTEM-guided transfusion algorithms may reduce the risk of mortality, bleeding volume, and the need for fresh frozen plasma and platelets, but the evidence is very uncertain. Further, the results were primarily based on the adult population undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

出血患者的血栓弹性成像或旋转血栓弹性测量指导算法:荟萃分析和试验序列分析的最新系统综述。
背景:出血患者由于止血功能受损而面临显著的发病率和死亡率。止血复苏已经发展,但最佳方法仍不清楚。主要目的是在一项最新的综述中评估TEG/ROTEM指导下输血与标准治疗在出血患者中的益处和风险。方法:根据Cochrane协作方法、PRISMA和GRADE指南,对随机对照试验进行meta分析和试验序列分析的系统评价。在五个主要数据库中进行了文献检索。包括儿童和成人患者。主要结局是死亡率,次要结局是血液制品的使用、失血、手术再干预和透析依赖性肾损伤。结果:本系统综述包括31项随机试验(n = 2756),其中大多数患者接受了择期心脏手术。TEG-/ rotemr引导的算法减少了新鲜冷冻血浆(RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.32-0.72, I2: 94%)、血小板(RR 0.7, 95% CI 0.55-0.91, I2: 57%)、手术再干预的风险(RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.94, I2: 0%)和出血的标准平均差异为-0.31 (95% CI -0.55 - -0.08, I2: 75%)。死亡率差异无统计学意义(RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00, I2: 5%)。根据GRADE方法,所有结果的证据确定性都很低。死亡率分析的试验序列分析表明,达到了最佳信息量的54%,α边界RR为0.81 (95% CI 0.63-1.03)。结论:TEG / rotem引导的输血算法可能会降低死亡率、出血量和对新鲜冷冻血浆和血小板的需求,但证据非常不确定。此外,研究结果主要基于接受择期心脏手术的成年人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信