Potentially toxic elements contamination and health risk assessment of coastal sediments in Betoya Bay, Morocco

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Rihab Ben-tahar, Nour-elhouda Basraoui, Oualid Boukich, Bouchra El guerrouj, Youssef Smiri
{"title":"Potentially toxic elements contamination and health risk assessment of coastal sediments in Betoya Bay, Morocco","authors":"Rihab Ben-tahar,&nbsp;Nour-elhouda Basraoui,&nbsp;Oualid Boukich,&nbsp;Bouchra El guerrouj,&nbsp;Youssef Smiri","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13495-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the potentially toxic elements (PTEs) contamination of Betoya Bay surface sediments to assess the degree of pollution and identify the source of these contaminants. Average PTE levels as mg/kg in Betoya Bay are ranked in descending order as Zn (22.68) &gt; Cr (8.64) &gt; Pb (7.24) &gt; Ni (6.82) &gt; As (6.62) &gt; Cu (5.78) &gt; Co (2.45) &gt; Cd (0.20). The sampling sites show an increase in PTEs at station 5, probably due to runoff from the wadi, and at the first station, where fishing activity is particularly intense. At all stations throughout the year, PTE levels were unpolluted as evaluated by the geoaccumulation index (<i>I</i><sub><i>geo</i></sub>) and the pollution load index (<i>PLI</i>). Almost all PTEs showed a “low contamination factor” according to the contamination factor index (<i>CF</i>). As assessed by the contamination degree (<i>CD</i>), all PTE levels at all stations and seasons were “low contamination degree”. The ecological risk indices (<i>E</i><sup><i>i</i></sup><sub><i>r</i></sub> and <i>RI</i>) indicated low to moderate ecological risk. In line with sediment quality requirements, the <i>M-ERM-Q</i> calculation suggests there is only a 9% chance that this particular combination of metals poses a threat. The non-carcinogenic health risk assessment showed that beach sand in the study area is entirely safe, presenting no additional health risk to children or adults. However, the carcinogenic risk showed a low to moderate carcinogenic risk for adults and a moderate to high carcinogenic risk for children. In addition, statistical analysis revealed that all PTEs are likely to have common sources, which may be related to the geology of the area.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13495-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the potentially toxic elements (PTEs) contamination of Betoya Bay surface sediments to assess the degree of pollution and identify the source of these contaminants. Average PTE levels as mg/kg in Betoya Bay are ranked in descending order as Zn (22.68) > Cr (8.64) > Pb (7.24) > Ni (6.82) > As (6.62) > Cu (5.78) > Co (2.45) > Cd (0.20). The sampling sites show an increase in PTEs at station 5, probably due to runoff from the wadi, and at the first station, where fishing activity is particularly intense. At all stations throughout the year, PTE levels were unpolluted as evaluated by the geoaccumulation index (Igeo) and the pollution load index (PLI). Almost all PTEs showed a “low contamination factor” according to the contamination factor index (CF). As assessed by the contamination degree (CD), all PTE levels at all stations and seasons were “low contamination degree”. The ecological risk indices (Eir and RI) indicated low to moderate ecological risk. In line with sediment quality requirements, the M-ERM-Q calculation suggests there is only a 9% chance that this particular combination of metals poses a threat. The non-carcinogenic health risk assessment showed that beach sand in the study area is entirely safe, presenting no additional health risk to children or adults. However, the carcinogenic risk showed a low to moderate carcinogenic risk for adults and a moderate to high carcinogenic risk for children. In addition, statistical analysis revealed that all PTEs are likely to have common sources, which may be related to the geology of the area.

Abstract Image

摩洛哥贝托亚湾沿海沉积物的潜在有毒元素污染和健康风险评估。
本研究对贝托雅湾表层沉积物的潜在有毒元素(PTEs)污染进行了调查,以评估污染程度并确定这些污染物的来源。贝托雅湾的平均PTE水平(mg/kg)由高到低依次为Zn (22.68) > Cr (8.64) > Pb (7.24) > Ni (6.82) > as (6.62) > Cu (5.78) > Co (2.45) > Cd(0.20)。采样点显示,5号站和第一站的pte增加,这可能是由于来自河道的径流,而第一站的捕鱼活动特别激烈。通过地质累积指数(Igeo)和污染负荷指数(PLI)评价,所有站点全年PTE水平均未受到污染。根据污染因子指数(CF),几乎所有的pte都表现为“低污染因子”。污染程度(CD)评价显示,各站点和季节PTE水平均为“低污染程度”。生态风险指数(Eir和RI)显示为中低生态风险。根据沉积物质量要求,M-ERM-Q计算表明,这种特殊的金属组合构成威胁的可能性只有9%。非致癌性健康风险评估表明,研究区域的沙滩是完全安全的,对儿童或成人没有额外的健康风险。然而,致癌风险显示,成人的致癌风险为低至中等,儿童的致癌风险为中至高。此外,统计分析表明,所有pte可能具有共同的来源,这可能与该地区的地质有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信