Comparative demography of two wild cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, collected in western Washington state and reared under laboratory conditions
Melissa K. Driessnack, Jenifer McIntyre, John D. Stark
{"title":"Comparative demography of two wild cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, collected in western Washington state and reared under laboratory conditions","authors":"Melissa K. Driessnack, Jenifer McIntyre, John D. Stark","doi":"10.1111/ivb.12448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Populations of two cladoceran species, <i>Alona quadrangularis</i> and <i>Scapholeberis mucronata</i>, were collected from a pond in Puyallup, Washington, and reared under controlled laboratory conditions. Life tables were developed for each species under the same environmental conditions and feeding regimen to develop basic demographic data. We also compared the major demographic parameters of these two wild species with those of several cladoceran species that are commonly used in laboratory research, <i>Daphnia pulex</i>, <i>D. magna</i>, and <i>Ceriodaphnia dubia</i>. Compared to <i>A. quadrangularis</i>, <i>S. mucronata</i> had a much higher net reproductive rate (<i>R</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>), a longer generation time (<i>T</i>), but a similar intrinsic rate of increase (<i>r</i><sub><i>m</i></sub>), similar finite rate of increase, similar doubling time (<i>DT</i>), and a lower birth rate (<i>b</i>). Both wild species had lower <i>R</i><sub><i>0</i></sub>, shorter <i>T</i>, and higher <i>b</i> than in <i>D. pulex</i>, <i>D. magna</i>, and <i>C. dubia</i>. Results of this study showed that demographic rates differed between <i>A. quadrangularis</i> and <i>S. mucronata</i>, and differed from those reported for the other three laboratory species. These results suggest that data developed for commonly used cladoceran species in the laboratory should not be used to make generalizations about effects on wild species.</p>","PeriodicalId":54923,"journal":{"name":"Invertebrate Biology","volume":"143 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ivb.12448","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Invertebrate Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ivb.12448","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Populations of two cladoceran species, Alona quadrangularis and Scapholeberis mucronata, were collected from a pond in Puyallup, Washington, and reared under controlled laboratory conditions. Life tables were developed for each species under the same environmental conditions and feeding regimen to develop basic demographic data. We also compared the major demographic parameters of these two wild species with those of several cladoceran species that are commonly used in laboratory research, Daphnia pulex, D. magna, and Ceriodaphnia dubia. Compared to A. quadrangularis, S. mucronata had a much higher net reproductive rate (R0), a longer generation time (T), but a similar intrinsic rate of increase (rm), similar finite rate of increase, similar doubling time (DT), and a lower birth rate (b). Both wild species had lower R0, shorter T, and higher b than in D. pulex, D. magna, and C. dubia. Results of this study showed that demographic rates differed between A. quadrangularis and S. mucronata, and differed from those reported for the other three laboratory species. These results suggest that data developed for commonly used cladoceran species in the laboratory should not be used to make generalizations about effects on wild species.
期刊介绍:
Invertebrate Biology presents fundamental advances in our understanding of the structure, function, ecology, and evolution of the invertebrates, which represent the vast majority of animal diversity. Though ultimately organismal in focus, the journal publishes manuscripts addressing phenomena at all levels of biological organization. Invertebrate Biology welcomes manuscripts addressing the biology of invertebrates from diverse perspectives, including those of:
• genetics, cell, and molecular biology
• morphology and biomechanics
• reproduction and development
• physiology and behavior
• ecology
• evolution and phylogenetics