Comparing Autistic and Neurotypical Responses to Conventional and Modified Questions in Algorithmically Scored Asynchronous Video Interviews: A Textual Analysis

Abstract

Traditional interviews often rely on social cues and abstract reasoning, posing challenges for some autistic individuals. Asynchronous video interviews (AVIs) and modifications to interview questions were evaluated as two ways to promote inclusion and equity. Autistic candidates answered conventional or modified questions (per expert feedback), which were compared to a random sample of the general population who answered conventional questions. After question modifications, group differences in algorithmically assigned scores remained, highlighting the need for accommodations. The number of words spoken was a differentiator between autistic and neurotypical job seekers. Text analysis revealed systematic differences in response content. Our study emphasizes the complexity of hiring autistic individuals, with the need for tailored accommodations and continued research.