Risk of artery dissection during systemic exposure to vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Jun Okui, Takashi Waki, Kazuhiro Kajiyama, Sono Sawada, Shinya Watanabe, Yukari Namba, Ayano Kobayashi, Shuichi Kawarasaki, Kohei Amakasu, Toyotaka Iguchi, Naoya Horiuchi, Yoshiaki Uyama
{"title":"Risk of artery dissection during systemic exposure to vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors","authors":"Jun Okui,&nbsp;Takashi Waki,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Kajiyama,&nbsp;Sono Sawada,&nbsp;Shinya Watanabe,&nbsp;Yukari Namba,&nbsp;Ayano Kobayashi,&nbsp;Shuichi Kawarasaki,&nbsp;Kohei Amakasu,&nbsp;Toyotaka Iguchi,&nbsp;Naoya Horiuchi,&nbsp;Yoshiaki Uyama","doi":"10.1111/cts.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Whether or not vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors (VPIs) increase the risk of artery dissection is still unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the possibility of artery dissection as a class effect of VPIs using nationwide real-world data. This cohort study was conducted based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), which spans nearly the entire Japanese population of over 100 million individuals. We included the patients prescribed with 12 types of VPIs between 2012 and 2020. The incidence rate (IR) ratio of artery dissection for each VPI were estimated in comparison with bevacizumab, the only VPI in Japan with artery dissection listed in the package insert. Artery dissection as an outcome was targeted for acute artery dissection requiring hospitalization (including dissecting aneurysm). As a reference, a natural IR standardized by sex and age of bevacizumab-prescribed patients was also estimated using the direct method for the general population of NDB. Of 503,342 patients, the IR of artery dissection for bevacizumab was 44.4 (/100,000 person-years), and the adjusted IR ratios for each VPI compared with bevacizumab were consistently similar to or &gt;1.0. The IRs for each VPI were also higher than the crude natural IR (1.66/100,000 person-years; 95% CI: 1.59–1.73) and the standardized natural IR (2.18/100,000 person-years; 95% CI: 1.86–2.50). Real-world evidence suggests the risk of artery dissection as a class effect of VPIs. More attention on this risk will be necessary when using VPIs in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70096","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether or not vascular endothelial growth factor pathway inhibitors (VPIs) increase the risk of artery dissection is still unknown. This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the possibility of artery dissection as a class effect of VPIs using nationwide real-world data. This cohort study was conducted based on the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan (NDB), which spans nearly the entire Japanese population of over 100 million individuals. We included the patients prescribed with 12 types of VPIs between 2012 and 2020. The incidence rate (IR) ratio of artery dissection for each VPI were estimated in comparison with bevacizumab, the only VPI in Japan with artery dissection listed in the package insert. Artery dissection as an outcome was targeted for acute artery dissection requiring hospitalization (including dissecting aneurysm). As a reference, a natural IR standardized by sex and age of bevacizumab-prescribed patients was also estimated using the direct method for the general population of NDB. Of 503,342 patients, the IR of artery dissection for bevacizumab was 44.4 (/100,000 person-years), and the adjusted IR ratios for each VPI compared with bevacizumab were consistently similar to or >1.0. The IRs for each VPI were also higher than the crude natural IR (1.66/100,000 person-years; 95% CI: 1.59–1.73) and the standardized natural IR (2.18/100,000 person-years; 95% CI: 1.86–2.50). Real-world evidence suggests the risk of artery dissection as a class effect of VPIs. More attention on this risk will be necessary when using VPIs in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

全身暴露于血管内皮生长因子途径抑制剂时动脉夹层的风险
血管内皮生长因子通路抑制剂(vpi)是否会增加动脉夹层的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在利用全国范围内的真实数据,定量评估动脉夹层作为vpi的一类效应的可能性。这项队列研究是基于日本国家健康保险索赔和特定健康检查数据库(NDB)进行的,该数据库涵盖了几乎整个日本人口的1亿多人。我们纳入了2012年至2020年间使用12种vpi的患者。与贝伐单抗(日本唯一一种包装说明书中列出的动脉夹层的VPI)相比,估计每种VPI的动脉夹层发生率(IR)比。动脉夹层是需要住院治疗的急性动脉夹层(包括夹层动脉瘤)的预后指标。作为参考,贝伐单抗处方患者按性别和年龄标准化的自然IR也使用NDB一般人群的直接方法进行估计。在503,342例患者中,贝伐单抗的动脉夹层IR为44.4(/100,000人-年),与贝伐单抗相比,每个VPI的调整IR比率始终相似或≤1.0。每个VPI的IR也高于粗天然IR(1.66/100,000人-年;95% CI: 1.59-1.73)和标准化自然IR(2.18/100,000人-年;95% ci: 1.86-2.50)。实际证据表明,动脉夹层风险是vpi的一类影响。在临床实践中使用vpi时,需要更多地关注这种风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信