Remoteness and subjectivity in gas extraction: Indigenous agency and the roadless design

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Ana Watson , Conny Davidsen
{"title":"Remoteness and subjectivity in gas extraction: Indigenous agency and the roadless design","authors":"Ana Watson ,&nbsp;Conny Davidsen","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Past research has confirmed how ‘green’ extractive projects can reproduce exclusion and displacement overall, but constructions of otherness and remoteness that emerge in such green illusions of extractivism and their resistance remains little understood. Peru’s Camisea liquid natural gas (LNG) extraction in the Peruvian Amazon has been framed as an environmentally friendly flagship project because of its enclave or roadless design that enables a smaller environmental footprint. Drawing on a political ecology analysis of subject formation and co-production of remoteness, this paper analyzes the agendas and effects of constructed “remoteness” in its resource extraction as a strategy to design, legitimize, and enforce territorial control. This analytical lens moves away from strict binaries of the powerful and the powerless towards a continuum of power in the resistance of extraction. We found that the notion of ‘remoteness’ is a central rhetorical strategy that paradoxically enables and limits corporate expansion, neoliberal agendas and Indigenous tactics to negotiate access to benefits. This study contributes to and works toward a more diversified power knowledge base on the ways in which environmental claims in extractivism are assessed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 104166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524002276","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Past research has confirmed how ‘green’ extractive projects can reproduce exclusion and displacement overall, but constructions of otherness and remoteness that emerge in such green illusions of extractivism and their resistance remains little understood. Peru’s Camisea liquid natural gas (LNG) extraction in the Peruvian Amazon has been framed as an environmentally friendly flagship project because of its enclave or roadless design that enables a smaller environmental footprint. Drawing on a political ecology analysis of subject formation and co-production of remoteness, this paper analyzes the agendas and effects of constructed “remoteness” in its resource extraction as a strategy to design, legitimize, and enforce territorial control. This analytical lens moves away from strict binaries of the powerful and the powerless towards a continuum of power in the resistance of extraction. We found that the notion of ‘remoteness’ is a central rhetorical strategy that paradoxically enables and limits corporate expansion, neoliberal agendas and Indigenous tactics to negotiate access to benefits. This study contributes to and works toward a more diversified power knowledge base on the ways in which environmental claims in extractivism are assessed.
天然气开采中的偏远与主体性:本土代理与无路设计
过去的研究已经证实了“绿色”采掘项目是如何在整体上再现排斥和流离失所的,但是在这种采掘主义的绿色幻想中出现的他者性和距离性的构建及其抵抗仍然很少被理解。秘鲁亚马逊地区的Camisea液化天然气(LNG)开采项目被认为是一个环保的旗舰项目,因为它的飞地或无路设计使环境足迹更小。通过对主体形成和异地共同生产的政治生态学分析,本文分析了构建的“异地”在其资源开采中的议程和效果,作为一种设计、合法化和实施领土控制的策略。这种分析的镜头从强大和无能的严格二元对立转向了抵抗抽取的连续权力。我们发现,“偏远”的概念是一种核心修辞策略,它矛盾地促进和限制了企业扩张、新自由主义议程和土著策略,以谈判获得利益。本研究有助于并致力于建立一个更多样化的权力知识库,以评估采掘活动中环境索赔的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信