Confusion of extragalactic sources in the far-infrared: A baseline assessment of the performance of PRIMAger in intensity and polarization

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Matthieu Béthermin, Alberto D. Bolatto, François Boulanger, Charles M. Bradford, Denis Burgarella, Laure Ciesla, James Donnellan, Brandon S. Hensley, Jason Glenn, Guilaine Lagache, Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez, Seb Oliver, Alexandra Pope, Marc Sauvage
{"title":"Confusion of extragalactic sources in the far-infrared: A baseline assessment of the performance of PRIMAger in intensity and polarization","authors":"Matthieu Béthermin, Alberto D. Bolatto, François Boulanger, Charles M. Bradford, Denis Burgarella, Laure Ciesla, James Donnellan, Brandon S. Hensley, Jason Glenn, Guilaine Lagache, Enrique Lopez-Rodriguez, Seb Oliver, Alexandra Pope, Marc Sauvage","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202450269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Aims.<i/> Because of their limited angular resolution, far-infrared telescopes are usually affected by the confusion phenomenon. Since several galaxies can be located in the same instrumental beam, only the brightest objects emerge from the fluctuations caused by fainter sources. The PRobe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics imager (PRIMAger) will observe the mid- and far-infrared (25–235 μm) sky both in intensity and polarization. We aim to provide predictions of the confusion level and its consequences for future surveys.<i>Methods.<i/> We produced simulated PRIMAger maps affected only by the confusion noise using the simulated infrared extragalactic sky (SIDES) semi-empirical simulation. We then estimated the confusion limit in these maps and extracted the sources using a basic blind extractor. By comparing the input galaxy catalog and the extracted source catalog, we derived various performance metrics as completeness, purity, and the accuracy of various measurements (e.g., the flux density in intensity and polarization or the polarization angle).<i>Results.<i/> In intensity maps, we predict that the confusion limit increases rapidly with increasing wavelength (from 21 μJy at 25 μm to 46 mJy at 235 μm). The confusion limit in polarization maps is more than two orders of magnitude lower (from 0.03 mJy at 96 μm to 0.25 mJy at 235 μm). Both in intensity and polarization maps, the measured (polarized) flux density is dominated by the brightest galaxy in the beam, but other objects also contribute in intensity maps at longer wavelengths (∼30% at 235 μm). We also show that galaxy clustering has a mild impact on confusion in intensity maps (up to 25%), while it is negligible in polarization maps. In intensity maps, a basic blind extraction will be sufficient to detect galaxies at the knee of the luminosity function up to <i>z<i/> ∼ 3 and 10<sup>11<sup/> M<sub>⊙<sub/> main-sequence galaxies up to <i>z<i/> ∼ 5. In polarization for the most conservative sensitivity forecast (payload requirements), ∼200 galaxies can be detected up to <i>z<i/> = 1.5 in two 1500 h surveys covering 1 deg<sup>2<sup/> and 10 deg<sup>2<sup/>. For a conservative sensitivity estimate, we expect ∼8000 detections up to <i>z<i/> = 2.5, opening a totally new window on the high-<i>z<i/> dust polarization. Finally, we show that intensity surveys at short wavelengths and polarization surveys at long wavelengths tend to reach confusion at similar depth. There is thus a strong synergy between them.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims. Because of their limited angular resolution, far-infrared telescopes are usually affected by the confusion phenomenon. Since several galaxies can be located in the same instrumental beam, only the brightest objects emerge from the fluctuations caused by fainter sources. The PRobe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics imager (PRIMAger) will observe the mid- and far-infrared (25–235 μm) sky both in intensity and polarization. We aim to provide predictions of the confusion level and its consequences for future surveys.Methods. We produced simulated PRIMAger maps affected only by the confusion noise using the simulated infrared extragalactic sky (SIDES) semi-empirical simulation. We then estimated the confusion limit in these maps and extracted the sources using a basic blind extractor. By comparing the input galaxy catalog and the extracted source catalog, we derived various performance metrics as completeness, purity, and the accuracy of various measurements (e.g., the flux density in intensity and polarization or the polarization angle).Results. In intensity maps, we predict that the confusion limit increases rapidly with increasing wavelength (from 21 μJy at 25 μm to 46 mJy at 235 μm). The confusion limit in polarization maps is more than two orders of magnitude lower (from 0.03 mJy at 96 μm to 0.25 mJy at 235 μm). Both in intensity and polarization maps, the measured (polarized) flux density is dominated by the brightest galaxy in the beam, but other objects also contribute in intensity maps at longer wavelengths (∼30% at 235 μm). We also show that galaxy clustering has a mild impact on confusion in intensity maps (up to 25%), while it is negligible in polarization maps. In intensity maps, a basic blind extraction will be sufficient to detect galaxies at the knee of the luminosity function up to z ∼ 3 and 1011 M main-sequence galaxies up to z ∼ 5. In polarization for the most conservative sensitivity forecast (payload requirements), ∼200 galaxies can be detected up to z = 1.5 in two 1500 h surveys covering 1 deg2 and 10 deg2. For a conservative sensitivity estimate, we expect ∼8000 detections up to z = 2.5, opening a totally new window on the high-z dust polarization. Finally, we show that intensity surveys at short wavelengths and polarization surveys at long wavelengths tend to reach confusion at similar depth. There is thus a strong synergy between them.
远红外星系外光源的混淆:PRIMAger在强度和偏振性能的基线评估
目标。由于远红外望远镜的角度分辨率有限,通常会受到混淆现象的影响。由于几个星系可以被定位在相同的仪器光束中,只有最亮的物体才会从较暗的光源引起的波动中出现。探测远红外天体物理成像仪任务(PRIMAger)将观测中、远红外(25-235 μm)天空的强度和偏振。我们的目的是为未来的调查提供混淆程度及其后果的预测。我们使用模拟的红外河外天空(SIDES)半经验模拟生成了仅受混淆噪声影响的模拟PRIMAger地图。然后,我们估计了这些地图的混淆极限,并使用基本的盲提取器提取源。通过比较输入的星系表和提取的源表,我们得到了各种性能指标,如完整性、纯度和各种测量的准确性(如强度和偏振或偏振角的通量密度)。在强度图中,我们预测随着波长的增加,混淆极限迅速增加(从25 μm处的21 μJy增加到235 μm处的46 μJy)。偏振图的混淆极限降低了两个多数量级(从96 μm处的0.03 mJy到235 μm处的0.25 mJy)。在强度图和偏振图中,测量到的(极化)通量密度由光束中最亮的星系主导,但其他物体也在较长波长的强度图中做出贡献(在235 μm处约30%)。我们还表明,星系团对强度图中的混淆有轻微的影响(高达25%),而在极化图中可以忽略不计。在强度图中,一个基本的盲提取将足以探测到在亮度函数的膝盖处高达z ~ 3的星系和1011 M⊙主序星系高达z ~ 5的星系。在偏振最保守的灵敏度预测(有效载荷要求)中,在两个1500小时的覆盖1°2和10°2的巡天中,可以探测到~ 200个星系,最高z = 1.5。对于保守的灵敏度估计,我们预计高达z = 2.5的探测约8000次,为高z尘埃偏振打开了一个全新的窗口。最后,我们发现在短波长的强度测量和在长波长的偏振测量在相似的深度往往达到混淆。因此,它们之间有很强的协同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信