Insights into metaphor (mis)understandings

IF 0.6 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jacob LaVoie
{"title":"Insights into metaphor (mis)understandings","authors":"Jacob LaVoie","doi":"10.1111/tger.12297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conventional metaphors are a fundamental component of everyday communication, yet they are often overlooked in post-secondary German-language programs. This study examines the extent to which vocabulary breadth influences 19 L2 German learners’ comprehension of conventional German metaphors, particularly those that exhibit cross-linguistic differences in lexical form and conceptual motivation. Employing a mixed-methods analysis, this research investigates the interpretations of 40 highly-frequent, polysemic verbs in metaphorical contexts by L2 German speakers. The findings indicate a significant relationship between the breadth of a learner's vocabulary and their ability to accurately decode conventional metaphors. However, the study also reveals that learners with extensive vocabularies may be misled by their own knowledge, frequently failing to recognize extended metaphorical meanings despite familiarity with the lexeme and confidence in their interpretations. These results highlight the intricate interplay between lexical knowledge and cross-linguistic differences in figurative language, underscoring the necessity for nuanced instruction in metaphor comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":43693,"journal":{"name":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","volume":"57 2","pages":"162-179"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tger.12297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conventional metaphors are a fundamental component of everyday communication, yet they are often overlooked in post-secondary German-language programs. This study examines the extent to which vocabulary breadth influences 19 L2 German learners’ comprehension of conventional German metaphors, particularly those that exhibit cross-linguistic differences in lexical form and conceptual motivation. Employing a mixed-methods analysis, this research investigates the interpretations of 40 highly-frequent, polysemic verbs in metaphorical contexts by L2 German speakers. The findings indicate a significant relationship between the breadth of a learner's vocabulary and their ability to accurately decode conventional metaphors. However, the study also reveals that learners with extensive vocabularies may be misled by their own knowledge, frequently failing to recognize extended metaphorical meanings despite familiarity with the lexeme and confidence in their interpretations. These results highlight the intricate interplay between lexical knowledge and cross-linguistic differences in figurative language, underscoring the necessity for nuanced instruction in metaphor comprehension.

对隐喻(误解)的洞察
传统隐喻是日常交流的基本组成部分,但在中学后的德语课程中,它们经常被忽视。本研究考察了词汇广度对二语德语学习者对传统德语隐喻理解的影响程度,特别是那些在词汇形式和概念动机上表现出跨语言差异的隐喻。本研究采用混合分析方法,调查了德语二语使用者在隐喻语境中对40个高频率、多义动词的解释。研究结果表明,学习者词汇量的广度与他们准确解读传统隐喻的能力之间存在显著关系。然而,研究也表明,词汇量大的学习者可能会被自己的知识误导,尽管熟悉词汇,对自己的解释有信心,但往往无法识别延伸的隐喻意义。这些结果强调了词汇知识与比喻语言跨语言差异之间复杂的相互作用,强调了隐喻理解中细致入微指导的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German
Unterrichtspraxis-Teaching German LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信