Technology adoption performance evaluation applied to testing industrial REST APIs

IF 2 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Alexander Poth, Olsi Rrjolli, Andrea Arcuri
{"title":"Technology adoption performance evaluation applied to testing industrial REST APIs","authors":"Alexander Poth,&nbsp;Olsi Rrjolli,&nbsp;Andrea Arcuri","doi":"10.1007/s10515-024-00477-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Testing is an important task within software development. To write test cases and integrate them into an automated test suite requires a significant amount of work. Given a set of requirements and specifications of a software, testing is needed to verify its correctness. When done manually, it is an expensive and error prone task. To facilitate such work, automated test-case generation via tools could be useful. Test-case generation can be facilitated by deterministic algorithm-driven approaches or non-deterministic approaches such as with AI (e.g., evolutionary and LLM). The different approaches come with their strengths and weaknesses, which must be considered when integrating these approaches into a product test procedure in industry. Several novel testing techniques and tools have been developed in academia and industry, but how effective they are and how to integrate them in real-world large industrial scenarios is still unclear. In this paper, a systematic approach is presented to evaluate test-case generation methodologies and integrate them into a scalable enterprise setup. The specific context is black-box testing of REST APIs, based on their OpenAPI schemas. The aim is to facilitate IT product development and service delivery. The proposed Technology Adoption Performance Evaluation (TAPE) approach is evaluated by a case study within the Group IT of Volkswagen AG. We evaluated existing tools such as OpenAPI Generator, EvoMaster and StarCoder which are built on different technologies. Our results show that these tools are of benefit for test engineers to facilitate test-case specification and design within the Group IT of Volkswagen AG.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10515-024-00477-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-024-00477-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing is an important task within software development. To write test cases and integrate them into an automated test suite requires a significant amount of work. Given a set of requirements and specifications of a software, testing is needed to verify its correctness. When done manually, it is an expensive and error prone task. To facilitate such work, automated test-case generation via tools could be useful. Test-case generation can be facilitated by deterministic algorithm-driven approaches or non-deterministic approaches such as with AI (e.g., evolutionary and LLM). The different approaches come with their strengths and weaknesses, which must be considered when integrating these approaches into a product test procedure in industry. Several novel testing techniques and tools have been developed in academia and industry, but how effective they are and how to integrate them in real-world large industrial scenarios is still unclear. In this paper, a systematic approach is presented to evaluate test-case generation methodologies and integrate them into a scalable enterprise setup. The specific context is black-box testing of REST APIs, based on their OpenAPI schemas. The aim is to facilitate IT product development and service delivery. The proposed Technology Adoption Performance Evaluation (TAPE) approach is evaluated by a case study within the Group IT of Volkswagen AG. We evaluated existing tools such as OpenAPI Generator, EvoMaster and StarCoder which are built on different technologies. Our results show that these tools are of benefit for test engineers to facilitate test-case specification and design within the Group IT of Volkswagen AG.

应用于测试工业REST api的技术采用性能评估
测试是软件开发中的一项重要任务。编写测试用例并将它们集成到自动化测试套件中需要大量的工作。给定软件的一组需求和规范,需要进行测试以验证其正确性。当手工完成时,这是一个昂贵且容易出错的任务。为了促进这样的工作,通过工具自动生成测试用例可能是有用的。测试用例的生成可以通过确定性算法驱动的方法或非确定性方法(如AI)来促进(例如,进化和LLM)。不同的方法有其优点和缺点,在将这些方法集成到工业中的产品测试过程中必须考虑到这一点。学术界和工业界已经开发了一些新的测试技术和工具,但它们的有效性以及如何将它们集成到现实世界的大型工业场景中仍不清楚。在本文中,提出了一种系统的方法来评估测试用例生成方法,并将它们集成到可扩展的企业设置中。具体的上下文是基于OpenAPI模式的REST api的黑盒测试。其目的是促进资讯科技产品开发和服务交付。提出的技术采用绩效评估(磁带)的方法是通过一个案例研究在大众汽车集团的IT进行评估。我们评估了基于不同技术的现有工具,如OpenAPI Generator、EvoMaster和StarCoder。我们的结果表明,这些工具有利于测试工程师促进测试用例的规格和设计在大众汽车集团的IT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信