Mariona Gonzalez-Pineda , Conxita Avila , Gissell Lacerot , Juan Pablo Lozoya , Franco Teixeira de Mello , Ricardo Faccio , Fernando Pignanelli , Humbert Salvadó
{"title":"Experimental ingestion of microplastics in three common Antarctic benthic species","authors":"Mariona Gonzalez-Pineda , Conxita Avila , Gissell Lacerot , Juan Pablo Lozoya , Franco Teixeira de Mello , Ricardo Faccio , Fernando Pignanelli , Humbert Salvadó","doi":"10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Microplastics (MP) have spread to every corner of the globe, reaching remote areas like Antarctica. Recent studies detected MP in marine environments, including biota. Benthic organisms suffer negative effects upon MP ingestion, leading to impacts on their populations. To address the current knowledge gap on how Antarctic benthic invertebrates interact with MP, we conducted an experiment exposing a bivalve (<em>Aequiyoldia eightsii</em>) and two ascidians (<em>Cnemidocarpa verrucosa</em> and <em>Molgula pedunculata</em>) to polyethylene microbeads (mb). Specimens of each species were exposed for 48 h to two different concentrations of microbeads, a low dose (100 mb/l) and a high dose (1000 mb/l), with the same proportion of four different microbead size fractions (Fine (10–20 μm), Small (45–53 μm), Medium (106–125 μm), and Large (850–1000 μm)). After exposure, all three species had ingested microbeads. Significant differences between doses were observed in <em>A. eightsii</em> and <em>C. verrucosa</em> but not in <em>M. pedunculata</em>. Both ascidians ingested microbeads of all size fractions, whereas the bivalve did not ingest the largest microbeads. No significant differences were found between species in the number nor sizes of microbeads ingested. Minor variations between taxa may be attributed to the specific biology and anatomy of each species. Our study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of Antarctic benthic ecosystems, suggesting that the interaction with MP is species-specific. We believe that this study provides a baseline for assessing MP pollution in Antarctic benthic invertebrates and will help to inform policy-makers in protecting and preserving Antarctic marine ecosystems from MP pollution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18204,"journal":{"name":"Marine environmental research","volume":"204 ","pages":"Article 106879"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine environmental research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113624005403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microplastics (MP) have spread to every corner of the globe, reaching remote areas like Antarctica. Recent studies detected MP in marine environments, including biota. Benthic organisms suffer negative effects upon MP ingestion, leading to impacts on their populations. To address the current knowledge gap on how Antarctic benthic invertebrates interact with MP, we conducted an experiment exposing a bivalve (Aequiyoldia eightsii) and two ascidians (Cnemidocarpa verrucosa and Molgula pedunculata) to polyethylene microbeads (mb). Specimens of each species were exposed for 48 h to two different concentrations of microbeads, a low dose (100 mb/l) and a high dose (1000 mb/l), with the same proportion of four different microbead size fractions (Fine (10–20 μm), Small (45–53 μm), Medium (106–125 μm), and Large (850–1000 μm)). After exposure, all three species had ingested microbeads. Significant differences between doses were observed in A. eightsii and C. verrucosa but not in M. pedunculata. Both ascidians ingested microbeads of all size fractions, whereas the bivalve did not ingest the largest microbeads. No significant differences were found between species in the number nor sizes of microbeads ingested. Minor variations between taxa may be attributed to the specific biology and anatomy of each species. Our study highlights the need for a deeper understanding of Antarctic benthic ecosystems, suggesting that the interaction with MP is species-specific. We believe that this study provides a baseline for assessing MP pollution in Antarctic benthic invertebrates and will help to inform policy-makers in protecting and preserving Antarctic marine ecosystems from MP pollution.
期刊介绍:
Marine Environmental Research publishes original research papers on chemical, physical, and biological interactions in the oceans and coastal waters. The journal serves as a forum for new information on biology, chemistry, and toxicology and syntheses that advance understanding of marine environmental processes.
Submission of multidisciplinary studies is encouraged. Studies that utilize experimental approaches to clarify the roles of anthropogenic and natural causes of changes in marine ecosystems are especially welcome, as are those studies that represent new developments of a theoretical or conceptual aspect of marine science. All papers published in this journal are reviewed by qualified peers prior to acceptance and publication. Examples of topics considered to be appropriate for the journal include, but are not limited to, the following:
– The extent, persistence, and consequences of change and the recovery from such change in natural marine systems
– The biochemical, physiological, and ecological consequences of contaminants to marine organisms and ecosystems
– The biogeochemistry of naturally occurring and anthropogenic substances
– Models that describe and predict the above processes
– Monitoring studies, to the extent that their results provide new information on functional processes
– Methodological papers describing improved quantitative techniques for the marine sciences.